Re: Bug#49816: sysvinit shouldn't remove /var/run/dhcpcd-*.pid at startup

1999-11-12 Thread Franklin Belew
On Thu, Nov 11, 1999 at 07:57:41PM +0100, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: According to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The original bug report says: Since `dhcpcd' is executed at startup (in /etc/init.d/dhcpcd or /etc/init.d/networking) before /etc/init.d/bootmisc.sh, these files are removed

Redundant code for non-us?

1999-11-12 Thread Peter S Galbraith
The latest upstream version of powstatd comes in two favours, regular and one that use 128-bit TEA encryption for communication between master and slave. Currently, the upstream author is producing two source archives (but we are discussing this). The only difference is that one doesn't include

RE: Redundant code for non-us?

1999-11-12 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
Or can I upload everything to non-us and produce two binary packages (one for regular main and the other for non-us/main)? I have the feeling this is not allowed because it makes the source hard to find. Right? I would believe you are right. Two source archives it is )-:

Build-Depends question re: yacc, ctags, etc.

1999-11-12 Thread David Coe
If this has already been discussed, please just point me to it; I must have missed it... Yacc and ctags are provided by many different packages, and managed by update-alternatives, but there is no virtual package corresponding to either of them. I suspect there are other similar situations. I

Re: Build-Depends question re: yacc, ctags, etc.

1999-11-12 Thread Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho
On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 08:13:54PM +, David Coe wrote: Yacc and ctags are provided by many different packages, and managed by update-alternatives, but there is no virtual package corresponding to either of them. ... What should I do? Thanks. Contact the maintainers of such packages and

RE: Build-Depends question re: yacc, ctags, etc.

1999-11-12 Thread arto . astala
If you know, or suspect, that some might not do then make that knowledge explicit (at least by not listing all similar packages). All the packages providing *tags are probably pretty equivalent, but yacc, byacc, bison etc. have differences that mean that some grammars are not acceptable to all of

Re: Build-Depends question re: yacc, ctags, etc.

1999-11-12 Thread David Coe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If you know, or suspect, that some might not do then make that knowledge explicit (at least by not listing all similar packages). All the packages providing *tags are probably pretty equivalent, but yacc, byacc, bison etc. have differences that mean that some