dh_installmanpages: used -p but got man pages in other package too?

Although I have used -p nut I got the man pages in the nut-cgi build dir too. Doesn't this contradicts dh_installmanpages and debhelper man pages? [11:34:10 nut-0.44.1]$ grep -A12 "dh_installmanpages -N nut-doc -p nut" ../debuild.typescript dh_installmanpages -N nut-doc -p nut

Re: need help with library package

H. S. Teoh: [NON-Text Body part not included] I'm sorry, could you please repeat that, but this time readable? -- \\// peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/ Statement concerning unsolicited e-mail according to Swedish law: http://www.softwolves.pp.se/peter/reklampost.html -- To

source and binary versioning

Hello! I have source package version X that produces two binary packages. How can i make that one bin-package has version X, and another Y != X? Thanks. Peter Novodvorsky, IPLabs Linux Team member:

Re: need help with library package

On 2831T162438+0200, peter karlsson wrote: H. S. Teoh: [NON-Text Body part not included] What non-text body? It was perfectly readable text enclosed in the PGP block. -- %%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%% -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: source and binary versioning

On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 09:15:38PM +0400, Peter Novodvorsky wrote: Hello! I have source package version X that produces two binary packages. How can i make that one bin-package has version X, and another Y != X? Have separate changelogs for the separate binary packages. But then you must

how to prevent: rules/clean only operates warning-free only afterrules/build?

I notice that some packages (including one I have recently become the maintainer of) have in rules clean a command '-$(MAKE) -i clean' to invoke upstream's cleanup, then later dh_clean Makefile. This is fine, except packages that use things like imake to generate the upstream Makefile in the

dh_installmanpages: used -p but got man pages in other package too?

Although I have used -p nut I got the man pages in the nut-cgi build dir too. Doesn't this contradicts dh_installmanpages and debhelper man pages? [11:34:10 nut-0.44.1]$ grep -A12 dh_installmanpages -N nut-doc -p nut ../debuild.typescript dh_installmanpages -N nut-doc -p nut

Re: need help with library package

H. S. Teoh: [NON-Text Body part not included] I'm sorry, could you please repeat that, but this time readable? -- \\// peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/ Statement concerning unsolicited e-mail according to Swedish law: http://www.softwolves.pp.se/peter/reklampost.html

Re: Request for advice

On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 02:10:42PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote: Roger Burton West wrote: I haven't yet seen anyone editing XML with anything except a graphical tool (text-editor plus fancy bits, usually). FWIW, I write large documents in xml using vi. Me too :) It's very easy. I certainly

source and binary versioning

Hello! I have source package version X that produces two binary packages. How can i make that one bin-package has version X, and another Y != X? Thanks. Peter Novodvorsky, IPLabs Linux Team member: [EMAIL

Re: need help with library package

On 2831T162438+0200, peter karlsson wrote: H. S. Teoh: [NON-Text Body part not included] What non-text body? It was perfectly readable text enclosed in the PGP block. -- %%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%

Request for advice on packaging of libgoops

Hi, I'm a new Debian developer. I'm the maintainer of the GOOPS package (the object system for Guile). There are currently two Guiles in Debian: version 1.3 and 1.4. GOOPS will compile differently under libguile1.3-dev and libguile1.4-dev. I'm therefore considering breaking up the GOOPS

Re: need help with library package

On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 11:52:23PM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote: On 2831T162438+0200, peter karlsson wrote: H. S. Teoh: [NON-Text Body part not included] What non-text body? It was perfectly readable text enclosed in the PGP block. I hope this is a missconfigured Mutt

how to prevent: rules/clean only operates warning-free only after rules/build?

I notice that some packages (including one I have recently become the maintainer of) have in rules clean a command '-$(MAKE) -i clean' to invoke upstream's cleanup, then later dh_clean Makefile. This is fine, except packages that use things like imake to generate the upstream Makefile in the