On 2928T012303+0100, Colin Watson wrote:
I couldn't see it in policy, which was why I weakened my original
statement.
If build-time dependencies are specified, it must be possible to build
the package and produce working binaries on a system with the
build-essential packages
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 03:08:20PM +0200, Hans-Christian Armingeon wrote:
how can I put stderr in a file with a simple pipe?
21 | cat
--
Alexander Kotelnikov
Saint-Petersburg, Russia
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Hi,
I've been away from the Debian project for a couple years, but I'm now able
to come back and start packaging things again. I wonder if there is still a
size limit on packages? I want to package the ICU Unicode and I18N library,
and the resulting package right now is ~3.6 Mb. is that
On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Yves Arrouye wrote:
Hi,
Hi Yves,
I've been away from the Debian project for a couple years, but I'm now able
to come back and start packaging things again. I wonder if there is still a
size limit on packages? I want to package the ICU Unicode and I18N library,
and the
On 28-Sep-2000 Yves Arrouye wrote:
Hi,
I've been away from the Debian project for a couple years, but I'm now able
to come back and start packaging things again. I wonder if there is still a
size limit on packages? I want to package the ICU Unicode and I18N library,
and the resulting
A similar issue that bothered me when I had a dialup connection was
the constant upgrade of libraries;
1. Developer lives on the edge and usually has the latest libs installed
2. Package becomes dependant upon bleedingedge version of libs
-- BUT it is not really needed, for example gtk1.2.1
On 2928T120641+0100, Colin Watson wrote:
Does "consistent" mean "internally consistent" or
"consistent among all builds of that package"?
In this case: the latter. It was an explicit goal when the policy
amendment was being drafted.
Maybe somebody would like to rewrite it for clarity?
On 2928T012303+0100, Colin Watson wrote:
I couldn't see it in policy, which was why I weakened my original
statement.
If build-time dependencies are specified, it must be possible to build
the package and produce working binaries on a system with the
build-essential packages
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 12:59:30AM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
On 2928T092438+1200, Michael Beattie wrote:
But, if the user has something *extra* installed, that the configure script
picks up and uses, because it is optional for the package build... you do
the math.
That's
hi,
i am currently building a package which needs a system user. so i
use dynamically assigend system users (range 100-999). i install
it with adduser --system etc.
now, when a package is deinstalled, when is the user removed from
the database ? when postrm remove is called or is it postrm
purge?
On 27 Sep 2000, Itai Zukerman wrote:
For this situation, I would suggest that we start to be really strict, and
use chroot jails for *all* builds.
It may resolve the situation, but I would much more elgeant, if it would
not necessary, wouldn't it?
I support the chroot jail concept, but in
Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2928T012303+0100, Colin Watson wrote:
I couldn't see it in policy, which was why I weakened my original
statement.
If build-time dependencies are specified, it must be possible to build
the package and produce working binaries on
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 12:52:30PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
On 27 Sep 2000, Itai Zukerman wrote:
For this situation, I would suggest that we start to be really strict, and
use chroot jails for *all* builds.
It may resolve the situation, but I would much more elgeant, if it
Hi evrybody,
how can I put stderr in a file with a simple pipe?
Johnny
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 03:08:20PM +0200, Hans-Christian Armingeon wrote:
Hi evrybody,
how can I put stderr in a file with a simple pipe?
foo 2errfile.txt
--
Tom Cato Amundsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GNU Solfege - free eartraining, http://www.gnu.org/software/solfege/
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 03:08:20PM +0200, Hans-Christian Armingeon wrote:
how can I put stderr in a file with a simple pipe?
21 | cat
--
Alexander Kotelnikov
Saint-Petersburg, Russia
Hi,
I've been away from the Debian project for a couple years, but I'm now able
to come back and start packaging things again. I wonder if there is still a
size limit on packages? I want to package the ICU Unicode and I18N library,
and the resulting package right now is ~3.6 Mb. is that
On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Yves Arrouye wrote:
Hi,
Hi Yves,
I've been away from the Debian project for a couple years, but I'm now able
to come back and start packaging things again. I wonder if there is still a
size limit on packages? I want to package the ICU Unicode and I18N library,
and the
On 28-Sep-2000 Yves Arrouye wrote:
Hi,
I've been away from the Debian project for a couple years, but I'm now able
to come back and start packaging things again. I wonder if there is still a
size limit on packages? I want to package the ICU Unicode and I18N library,
and the resulting
considering we have packages like mozilla which top 10mb
Ugh! Dinosaurs are heavy, aren't they?
That said, if all of the contents are not useful to
all people, perhaps
it should be split. Every time this package is updated, its
users must
download 4mb's.
I know that. I'm working with
A similar issue that bothered me when I had a dialup connection was
the constant upgrade of libraries;
1. Developer lives on the edge and usually has the latest libs installed
2. Package becomes dependant upon bleedingedge version of libs
-- BUT it is not really needed, for example gtk1.2.1
On 2928T120641+0100, Colin Watson wrote:
Does consistent mean internally consistent or
consistent among all builds of that package?
In this case: the latter. It was an explicit goal when the policy
amendment was being drafted.
Maybe somebody would like to rewrite it for clarity? :-)
In
22 matches
Mail list logo
