Bug #79854 says that I should probably remove INSTALL.gz from my
package, presumably because it contains only the "Generic Installation
Instructions" that other packages like irssi and findutils contain as
well.
Is it allowed or desired to exclude documentation from binary packages
that are in
On 20010106T13+0100, Marc Haber wrote:
Is it allowed or desired to exclude documentation from binary packages
that are in the source?
Of course, if done with taste. The INSTALL file almost never should be
installed (it would not do any good for it to be installed, since the user
does the
" " == Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Goswin! You wrote:
Yes its possible and its covered. Try the web pages, I saw it
there yesterday.
You are mistaken. It is only desribed for build time
relationships (Build-Depends, etc). And no, the same procedure
Hi Goswin!
You wrote:
You can set whatever depends during build, just like the
${shlibs:Depends} does.
Ah, that's a solution that I didn't think about. Thanks!
--
Kind regards,
+---+
| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 11:13:43AM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
For my sndconfig package, I would like to declare a different dependecy
for the sparc architecture (sndconfig/sparc does not require isapnp,
which isn't even available for sparc). Is this possible? I haven't been
able to find
Hi,
The byacc upstream tarball on ftp.debian.org 52916 bytes long, but on
my development system, it compresses to 52930 bytes. (There hasn't
been an upload of this package in about a year, shame on me.) I need
to do an upload to fix several bugs, there have been no upstream
changes (I think
Hi Goswin!
You wrote:
Yes its possible and its covered. Try the web pages, I saw it there
yesterday.
You are mistaken. It is only desribed for build time relationships
(Build-Depends, etc). And no, the same procedure doesn't work for an
ordinary Depends relation.
--
Kind regards,
Bug #79854 says that I should probably remove INSTALL.gz from my
package, presumably because it contains only the Generic Installation
Instructions that other packages like irssi and findutils contain as
well.
Is it allowed or desired to exclude documentation from binary packages
that are in the
On 20010106T13+0100, Marc Haber wrote:
Is it allowed or desired to exclude documentation from binary packages
that are in the source?
Of course, if done with taste. The INSTALL file almost never should be
installed (it would not do any good for it to be installed, since the user
does the
== Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Goswin! You wrote:
Yes its possible and its covered. Try the web pages, I saw it
there yesterday.
You are mistaken. It is only desribed for build time
relationships (Build-Depends, etc). And no, the same procedure
Hi Goswin!
You wrote:
You can set whatever depends during build, just like the
${shlibs:Depends} does.
Ah, that's a solution that I didn't think about. Thanks!
--
Kind regards,
+---+
| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 11:13:43AM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
For my sndconfig package, I would like to declare a different dependecy
for the sparc architecture (sndconfig/sparc does not require isapnp,
which isn't even available for sparc). Is this possible? I haven't been
able to find
12 matches
Mail list logo
