At Sat, 13 Jan 2001 00:31:55 +0100 (CET), Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please explain which work was impossible for you because you aren't
a
developer until now? Do you have a personal problem with my sponsorship
for your packages or what other work is impossible for you without a
Debian
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 11:56:42PM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
and yes, I have a dupload.conf in that directory and a
~/.dupload.conf:
Weird. dupload(1) says that should work. It's a perl script,
so maybe you can debug it?
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 11:56:42PM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
and yes, I have a dupload.conf in that directory and a
~/.dupload.conf:
Weird. dupload(1) says that should work. It's a perl script,
so maybe you can debug it?
The relevant lines
Hi Brian,
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 02:47:21PM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
While a year is long, this is by no means the most common, the mode of length
(in days) for 'awaiting DAM approval' is a pitiful 4 days.
Yes, I asked when it is supposed to happen because I'd thought that
awaiting DAM
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 12:45:28PM +0200, Eray Ozkural wrote:
Hi Brian,
'lo
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 02:47:21PM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
While a year is long, this is by no means the most common, the mode of length
(in days) for 'awaiting DAM approval' is a pitiful 4 days.
Yes, I asked
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 08:18:31AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 04:10:36PM +0200, Eray Ozkural wrote:
Does this mean I can never become a maintainer? I believe that
I have demonstrated my knowledge of debian's policy and skills with
the packages that I've
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 09:06:28AM -0800, Carl B. Constantine wrote:
One of the things I struggle with in Debian (and some other distros like
RedHat) is the issue of package dependencies and what happens if I recompile
a major package such as XFree86.
For example, say I have package 123
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 02:53:05PM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
I've actually just taken a look at the applicants list
http://nm.debian.org/nmlist.php and it appears that today the DAM has
apprently started creating accounts again today. Unfortunately, the six
lucky people have apparently
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 11:16:39PM +0100, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
how should one treat patches which aren't upstream, like
backports of a later release to the stable version?
is there a recommended way? or how are people treating it? or
people tell me how they do it and i can try the solutions
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 02:25:39PM +0100, Ove Kaaven wrote:
How does DAM approval occur?
When James has an opportunity. He's been unable to do so recently for
personal reasons but will be back on track soon. (Details were posted
to -private.)
But that doesn't help wondering
On 20010113T111032+0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
Only for very few tasks you will require to be an official Debian
maintainer.
However, as long as you are not a Debian developer, you do not have
power over policy or in constitutional issues. You can't, for example,
vote for a DPL or second
At Sat, 13 Jan 2001 00:31:55 +0100 (CET), Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please explain which work was impossible for you because you aren't
a
developer until now? Do you have a personal problem with my sponsorship
for your packages or what other work is impossible for you without a
Debian
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 11:56:42PM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
and yes, I have a dupload.conf in that directory and a
~/.dupload.conf:
Weird. dupload(1) says that should work. It's a perl script,
so maybe you can debug it?
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
People, stay calm! For a lot of work, no official Debian
Maintainership is required:
. Fixing bugs
. Working on boot floppies
. Revising bug reports
. Quality assurance
. Testing
. Helpping the web team
. uploading packages (through a sponsor)
Only for very few tasks you will require to
Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 11:56:42PM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
and yes, I have a dupload.conf in that directory and a
~/.dupload.conf:
Weird. dupload(1) says that should work. It's a perl script,
so maybe you can debug it?
The relevant lines
Hi Brian,
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 02:47:21PM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
While a year is long, this is by no means the most common, the mode of length
(in days) for 'awaiting DAM approval' is a pitiful 4 days.
Yes, I asked when it is supposed to happen because I'd thought that
awaiting DAM
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 12:45:28PM +0200, Eray Ozkural wrote:
Hi Brian,
'lo
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 02:47:21PM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
While a year is long, this is by no means the most common, the mode of
length
(in days) for 'awaiting DAM approval' is a pitiful 4 days.
Yes, I asked
Ok I have a rather long and drawn out question. But please be patient with
me as the question is part of the process of me learning the ropes for
becoming a maintainer and developer.
Branden: I've cc'd you as you are the maintainer for X and can answer those
questions. I don't know if you watch
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 08:18:31AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 04:10:36PM +0200, Eray Ozkural wrote:
Does this mean I can never become a maintainer? I believe that
I have demonstrated my knowledge of debian's policy and skills with
the packages that I've
I need some help trying to figure out why my two packages haven't made
it into testing.
hp48cc made it into the old woody distribution, but hasn't made it
into testing with no indication as of why. Maybe there isn't really a
probelm and it just hasn't been done yet?
electric is the package I'm
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 09:06:28AM -0800, Carl B. Constantine wrote:
One of the things I struggle with in Debian (and some other distros like
RedHat) is the issue of package dependencies and what happens if I recompile
a major package such as XFree86.
For example, say I have package 123
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 02:14:31PM -0500, Chris Ruffin wrote:
Binaries from electric 6.00-1 cannot be installed:
electric(m68k)
Sorry, don't know what that means, either, but I have some idea that
the package won't build on m68k. That's all fine and good, but am I
Are you sure
I've actually just taken a look at the applicants list
http://nm.debian.org/nmlist.php and it appears that today the DAM has
apprently started creating accounts again today. Unfortunately, the six
lucky people have apparently jumped the queue, and been rushed through
the process, since they were
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 02:53:05PM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
I've actually just taken a look at the applicants list
http://nm.debian.org/nmlist.php and it appears that today the DAM has
apprently started creating accounts again today. Unfortunately, the six
lucky people have apparently jumped
On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, Eric Dorland wrote:
I've actually just taken a look at the applicants list
http://nm.debian.org/nmlist.php and it appears that today the DAM has
apprently started creating accounts again today. Unfortunately, the six
lucky people have apparently jumped the queue, and
I didn't realise there were a few more people, because the new
maintainer list is sorted by application date, not DAM approval date. I'
not blaming anyone who was approved, I'm just curious how this happened?
Has tbm been made DAM?
* Ove Kaaven ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jan 2001,
* Eric Dorland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20010113 16:57]:
Has tbm been made DAM?
No.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgphJ68owpxNQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't remember any tool building the debs in the debian/ subdirectory.
If they do, I have never seen it leave them there. The .diff.gz,
.dsc, .orig.tar.gz, .deb, and .changes should all end up in the build
parent.
The problem was a ridiculously
On 20010113T111032+0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
Only for very few tasks you will require to be an official Debian
maintainer.
However, as long as you are not a Debian developer, you do not have
power over policy or in constitutional issues. You can't, for example,
vote for a DPL or second
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 11:16:39PM +0100, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
how should one treat patches which aren't upstream, like
backports of a later release to the stable version?
is there a recommended way? or how are people treating it? or
people tell me how they do it and i can try the solutions
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 02:25:39PM +0100, Ove Kaaven wrote:
How does DAM approval occur?
When James has an opportunity. He's been unable to do so recently for
personal reasons but will be back on track soon. (Details were posted
to -private.)
But that doesn't help wondering people
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 09:13:55PM +0100, Karl Soderstrom wrote:
I'm one of the lucky ones, so I'm really happy, but I must agree with you
that it seems pretty unfair to the guys approved by their AMs months
ago. Maybe their AMs didn't do good reports of them? I don't know, but the
fact
I intend to adopt browser-history from Karl M. Hegbloom, but I'm still
in the NM queue. Would anyone like to sponsor this package? I have an
upload of version 2.8-2 prepared, which can be found at
URL:http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~cjwatson/debian/.
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson
Hi Carl,
On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, Carl B. Constantine wrote:
For example, say I have package 123 and it depends on X = 4.0. Now I've
compiled and installed X 4.0.2 but the package database of course does not
recognize that I've done that. It still thinks I have X 3.3.6 therefore,
package 123
Stephen Langasek wrote:
I'm taking on the packaging of a library that has a build-time dependency on
the dev package from another library. Do any of the dpkg-dev or debhelper
tools check for this line in the control file? I've poked around a bit in
the source code, but haven't found what I'm
35 matches
Mail list logo
