searching sponsor

2001-07-09 Thread M G Berberich
Hello, I packaged my ppplog utility for debian (woody). ppplog is a tiny utility that logs online-times for ppp. It can not calculate costs like kppp, but works with debian-standard pon/poff calls. There is a desciption on http://www.fmi.uni-passau.de/~berberic/Linux/ppplog.html Any comments

Re: undocumented(7)

2001-07-09 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: *sigh* There are multiple man browsers in Debian: gman, gnome-help, konqueror, and tkman all provide man-browser, and coolman should. Sure. I assumed that all/most of them used man-db as a backend. If that's not the case, my musings are certainly silly.

Re: proud maintainer that do no want NUM :-)

2001-07-09 Thread Samuel Tardieu
On 9/07, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: | I know that is a really silly question, but I really dislike fixed in | NMU on my own bug pages :-))) Send a mail containing close ... in the body (by using the right bug number) to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2nd try at packaging

2001-07-09 Thread Etienne Grossmann
Hello, I have just packaged a small game, 'bloksi', which is a nearly clone of 'glotski'. I copied from the 'mailtools' and 'glotski' packages and think the 'bloksi' package is clean. Lintian is silent. I would be grateful if someone w/ packaging experience had a look at the resulting

Policy question about web application

2001-07-09 Thread R?mi Perrot
I read in the Debian policy that cgi script of web application must go in /usr/lib/cgi-bin/cgi-bin-name and should be referred as http://localhost/cgi-bin/cgi-bin-name (section 12.5). It look like that it is not allowed to have subdirectory under /usr/lib/cgi-bin/ if I have well understanding

Re: Procedural clarification

2001-07-09 Thread Jimmy Kaplowitz
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 04:31:24AM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote: Following from all this, I recommend: 1. Announce that you're willing to adopt package X, but that you'll need a sponsor. Don't forget to Cc: the WNPP bug for package X. 1.5 You might use the sponsorship program in the

[zeratul2@wanadoo.es: Bug#102811: grub: cannot access newer ext2 filesystems]

2001-07-09 Thread Jason Thomas
Hi, was wondering if anyone could suggest how to handle this bug. It is fixed in new versions of grub. Thanks. - Forwarded message from Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] - From: Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL

Re: [zeratul2@wanadoo.es: Bug#102811: grub: cannot access newer ext2 filesystems]

2001-07-09 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 01:25:08PM +1000, Jason Thomas wrote: was wondering if anyone could suggest how to handle this bug. It is fixed in new versions of grub. The bug is not serious enough to justify an update to stable, especially not when we are preparing for a new release. It's

Re: Policy question about web application

2001-07-09 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 11:25:38PM -0400, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote: On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 10:33:20PM +0200, R?mi Perrot wrote: I read in the Debian policy that cgi script of web application must go in /usr/lib/cgi-bin/cgi-bin-name and should be referred as

searching sponsor

2001-07-09 Thread M G Berberich
Hello, I packaged my ppplog utility for debian (woody). ppplog is a tiny utility that logs online-times for ppp. It can not calculate costs like kppp, but works with debian-standard pon/poff calls. There is a desciption on http://www.fmi.uni-passau.de/~berberic/Linux/ppplog.html Any comments

Re: undocumented(7)

2001-07-09 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: *sigh* There are multiple man browsers in Debian: gman, gnome-help, konqueror, and tkman all provide man-browser, and coolman should. Sure. I assumed that all/most of them used man-db as a backend. If that's not the case, my musings are certainly silly.

proud maintainer that do no want NUM :-)

2001-07-09 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
Hi mentors, I've uploaded one of my package with the wrong gpg uid (Stefano (Zack) Zacchiroli instead of Stefano Zacchiroli :-P), so the uploaded have been marked as NMU, is it possibile to change this status? I've tried to reupload the package but seems to me that is not possilbe cause I

Re: proud maintainer that do no want NUM :-)

2001-07-09 Thread Samuel Tardieu
On 9/07, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: | I know that is a really silly question, but I really dislike fixed in | NMU on my own bug pages :-))) Send a mail containing close ... in the body (by using the right bug number) to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sam

2nd try at packaging

2001-07-09 Thread Etienne Grossmann
Hello, I have just packaged a small game, 'bloksi', which is a nearly clone of 'glotski'. I copied from the 'mailtools' and 'glotski' packages and think the 'bloksi' package is clean. Lintian is silent. I would be grateful if someone w/ packaging experience had a look at the resulting

Policy question about web application

2001-07-09 Thread R?mi Perrot
I read in the Debian policy that cgi script of web application must go in /usr/lib/cgi-bin/cgi-bin-name and should be referred as http://localhost/cgi-bin/cgi-bin-name (section 12.5). It look like that it is not allowed to have subdirectory under /usr/lib/cgi-bin/ if I have well understanding

Re: Procedural clarification

2001-07-09 Thread Jimmy Kaplowitz
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 04:31:24AM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote: Following from all this, I recommend: 1. Announce that you're willing to adopt package X, but that you'll need a sponsor. Don't forget to Cc: the WNPP bug for package X. 1.5 You might use the sponsorship program in the

[zeratul2@wanadoo.es: Bug#102811: grub: cannot access newer ext2 filesystems]

2001-07-09 Thread Jason Thomas
Hi, was wondering if anyone could suggest how to handle this bug. It is fixed in new versions of grub. Thanks. - Forwarded message from Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] - From: Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL

Re: Policy question about web application

2001-07-09 Thread Jimmy Kaplowitz
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 10:33:20PM +0200, R?mi Perrot wrote: I read in the Debian policy that cgi script of web application must go in /usr/lib/cgi-bin/cgi-bin-name and should be referred as http://localhost/cgi-bin/cgi-bin-name (section 12.5). It look like that it is not allowed to have