Re: manual how to create a lib-package

2001-07-10 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Nikolaus Regnat [EMAIL PROTECTED] immo vero scripsit I'm searching for a manual (like New Maintainers' Guide) how to craete a package from a libary. Is there anything like that? As far as I know, the answer is No, and I think we need one too. You can see some of it in the debian-policy.

Unresolved symbol

2001-07-10 Thread sumit kalra
Hi everybody, I'm learning to make kernel modules and am currently working on a block device driver. I had installed kernel version 2.2.16-22 (RH - 7.0) and then changed it to 2.2.16 (downloaded from kernel.org). PROBLEM : When I try to "insmod blkdev.o" it gives a message "unresolved

Re:Unresolved symbol

2001-07-10 Thread matthew . vinall
unresolved symbol __constant_test_bit unresolved symbol __test_bit NOTE : I've included asm/bitops.h which has these two functions. If you've got unresolved symbols then the inline functions aren't actually being inlined. Are you giving gcc the -O option? Matt

looking for sponsor for gpmudmon-applet

2001-07-10 Thread Colin Walters
Hello, I'm looking for a sponsor for my package of gpmudmon; walters@space-ghost:~$ dpkg -s gpmudmon-applet Package: gpmudmon-applet Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Section: misc Installed-Size: 152 Maintainer: Colin Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] Version: 0.1.1-3 Depends: pmud,

Re: Patch problem -- always fuzzy?

2001-07-10 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
Mikael Hedin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: /tmp/micce$tar xzf ~/sw/cvsdeb/tela/tela_1.32.orig.tar.gz /tmp/micce$cd tela-1.32/ /tmp/micce/tela-1.32$diff -u doc/usrguide-7.html ~/debian/cvsdeb/tela/doc/usrguide-7.html ../mydiff /tmp/micce/tela-1.32$patch -p0 ../mydiff patching file

Re: [zeratul2@wanadoo.es: Bug#102811: grub: cannot access newer ext2 filesystems]

2001-07-10 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The bug is not serious enough to justify an update to stable, especially not when we are preparing for a new release. You could of course upload a potato package anyway, and punt the decision to the release managers. AFAIK the package will end up in

Re: g++ 3.0

2001-07-10 Thread Filip Van Raemdonck
On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 10:45:31PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 11:01:52PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote: I read on -devel that compiling packages with g++ 3 is problematic since they will not correctly link with C++ libraries built with an older compiler. I

Re: Unresolved symbol

2001-07-10 Thread Eric Van Buggenhaut
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 04:51:00PM +0530, sumit kalra wrote: Hi everybody, I'm learning to make kernel modules and am currently working on a block device driver. I had installed kernel version 2.2.16-22 (RH - 7.0) and then changed it to 2.2.16 (downloaded from kernel.org). FYI, this is

Re: Re: [zeratul2@wanadoo.es: Bug#102811: grub: cannot access newer ext2 filesystems]

2001-07-10 Thread Robert Millan
On Wed, 11 Jul 2001 00:17:43 +0200 (CEST), Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Bihlmeyer wrote: (b) it's dubious whether another potato point release will be done at all. How can you be so certain about the dubiousness of that? :-) We should consider *all* the possibilities,

Re: proud maintainer that do no want NUM :-)

2001-07-10 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 05:32:31PM +0200, Samuel Tardieu wrote: On 9/07, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: | I know that is a really silly question, but I really dislike fixed in | NMU on my own bug pages :-))) Send a mail containing close ... in the body (by using the right bug number) to

Re: [zeratul2@wanadoo.es: Bug#102811: grub: cannot access newer ext2 filesystems]

2001-07-10 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 01:25:08PM +1000, Jason Thomas wrote: was wondering if anyone could suggest how to handle this bug. It is fixed in new versions of grub. The bug is not serious enough to justify an update to stable, especially not when we are preparing for a new release. It's

Re: Policy question about web application

2001-07-10 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 11:25:38PM -0400, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote: On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 10:33:20PM +0200, R?mi Perrot wrote: I read in the Debian policy that cgi script of web application must go in /usr/lib/cgi-bin/cgi-bin-name and should be referred as

manual how to create a lib-package

2001-07-10 Thread Nikolaus Regnat
I'm searching for a manual (like New Maintainers' Guide) how to craete a package from a libary. Is there anything like that? Nikolaus

Re: manual how to create a lib-package

2001-07-10 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Nikolaus Regnat [EMAIL PROTECTED] immo vero scripsit I'm searching for a manual (like New Maintainers' Guide) how to craete a package from a libary. Is there anything like that? As far as I know, the answer is No, and I think we need one too. You can see some of it in the debian-policy.

Unresolved symbol

2001-07-10 Thread sumit kalra
Hi everybody, I'm learning to make kernel modules and am currently working on a block device driver. I had installed kernel version 2.2.16-22 (RH - 7.0) and then changed it to 2.2.16 (downloaded from kernel.org). PROBLEM : When I try to "insmod blkdev.o" it gives a message "unresolved

Re:Unresolved symbol

2001-07-10 Thread matthew . vinall
unresolved symbol __constant_test_bit unresolved symbol __test_bit NOTE : I've included asm/bitops.h which has these two functions. If you've got unresolved symbols then the inline functions aren't actually being inlined. Are you giving gcc the -O option? Matt

looking for sponsor for gpmudmon-applet

2001-07-10 Thread Colin Walters
Hello, I'm looking for a sponsor for my package of gpmudmon; [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -s gpmudmon-applet Package: gpmudmon-applet Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Section: misc Installed-Size: 152 Maintainer: Colin Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] Version: 0.1.1-3 Depends: pmud,

Re: Patch problem -- always fuzzy?

2001-07-10 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
Mikael Hedin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: /tmp/micce$tar xzf ~/sw/cvsdeb/tela/tela_1.32.orig.tar.gz /tmp/micce$cd tela-1.32/ /tmp/micce/tela-1.32$diff -u doc/usrguide-7.html ~/debian/cvsdeb/tela/doc/usrguide-7.html ../mydiff /tmp/micce/tela-1.32$patch -p0 ../mydiff patching file

Re: [zeratul2@wanadoo.es: Bug#102811: grub: cannot access newer ext2 filesystems]

2001-07-10 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The bug is not serious enough to justify an update to stable, especially not when we are preparing for a new release. You could of course upload a potato package anyway, and punt the decision to the release managers. AFAIK the package will end up in

Re: g++ 3.0

2001-07-10 Thread Filip Van Raemdonck
On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 10:45:31PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 11:01:52PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote: I read on -devel that compiling packages with g++ 3 is problematic since they will not correctly link with C++ libraries built with an older compiler. I figure

Re: Unresolved symbol

2001-07-10 Thread Eric Van Buggenhaut
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 04:51:00PM +0530, sumit kalra wrote: Hi everybody, I'm learning to make kernel modules and am currently working on a block device driver. I had installed kernel version 2.2.16-22 (RH - 7.0) and then changed it to 2.2.16 (downloaded from kernel.org). FYI, this

Re: g++ 3.0

2001-07-10 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 02:37:09PM +0200, Filip Van Raemdonck wrote: On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 10:45:31PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: If the problem occurs only on certain architectures, you may want to try it yourself on as many as possible before switching entirely to g++-3.0. What is

Re: [zeratul2@wanadoo.es: Bug#102811: grub: cannot access newer ext2 filesystems]

2001-07-10 Thread Santiago Vila
Robert Bihlmeyer wrote: (b) it's dubious whether another potato point release will be done at all. How can you be so certain about the dubiousness of that? :-) We should consider *all* the possibilities, including (but not limited to) that the release of woody will be delayed and there will be

Re: Re: [zeratul2@wanadoo.es: Bug#102811: grub: cannot access newer ext2 filesystems]

2001-07-10 Thread Robert Millan
On Wed, 11 Jul 2001 00:17:43 +0200 (CEST), Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Bihlmeyer wrote: (b) it's dubious whether another potato point release will be done at all. How can you be so certain about the dubiousness of that? :-) We should consider *all* the possibilities,

Re: proud maintainer that do no want NUM :-)

2001-07-10 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 05:32:31PM +0200, Samuel Tardieu wrote: On 9/07, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: | I know that is a really silly question, but I really dislike fixed in | NMU on my own bug pages :-))) Send a mail containing close ... in the body (by using the right bug number) to