On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, at 09:43 PM, Ryszard Lach wrote:
I'm just wondering why my #DEBHELPER# entries are being silently removed
instead of changed to /usr/doc/package symlinks creation/removal
sections. Any ideas ?
It's a deliberate change, part of completing the /usr/share/doc
transit
They are not being silently removed, but since none of the debhelper
scripts for your package need to do anything, and since dh_installdocs
no longer creates and removes symlinks, the debhelper section just stays
empty.
debhelper (4.1.0) unstable; urgency=low
* Remove /usr/doc manglement co
Hi!
I'm just wondering why my #DEBHELPER# entries are being silently removed
instead of changed to /usr/doc/package symlinks creation/removal
sections. Any ideas ?
Richard.
--
"First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they
fight you. Then you win." - Mohandas Gandhi.
On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, at 09:43 PM, Ryszard Lach wrote:
> I'm just wondering why my #DEBHELPER# entries are being silently removed
> instead of changed to /usr/doc/package symlinks creation/removal
> sections. Any ideas ?
It's a deliberate change, part of completing the /usr/share/doc
tra
They are not being silently removed, but since none of the debhelper
scripts for your package need to do anything, and since dh_installdocs
no longer creates and removes symlinks, the debhelper section just stays
empty.
debhelper (4.1.0) unstable; urgency=low
* Remove /usr/doc manglement c
Hi!
I'm just wondering why my #DEBHELPER# entries are being silently removed
instead of changed to /usr/doc/package symlinks creation/removal
sections. Any ideas ?
Richard.
--
"First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they
fight you. Then you win." - Mohandas Gandhi.
--
To UNSUB
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 09:50:56AM -0400, Michael Furr wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 09:26, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > Replace libpng-dev with libpng3-dev.
> How would that help things? It seems to me that from the log, the
> problem isn't my build-dep, but rather that libpng3 "is not going to be
>
On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 09:26, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Replace libpng-dev with libpng3-dev.
How would that help things? It seems to me that from the log, the
problem isn't my build-dep, but rather that libpng3 "is not going to be
installed":
> Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 09:24:51AM -0400, Michael Furr wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> My package of vegastrike is stuck in the autobuilders. The problem lies
> in its build-dep on libpng-dev. It needs to use version 3 of the lib.
> I read all of the recent discussions on -devel about this issue but seem
Hi all,
My package of vegastrike is stuck in the autobuilders. The problem lies
in its build-dep on libpng-dev. It needs to use version 3 of the lib.
I read all of the recent discussions on -devel about this issue but seem
to have missed the bottom line. How do I remedy this?
Do I just email
"Stefan Schwandter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could someone, who is interested in getting snd compile on non-i386
> arches maybe, please upload my latest snd and snd-motif packages?
Err, never mind, today I got a response from my sponsor...
regards, Stefan
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 09:50:56AM -0400, Michael Furr wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 09:26, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > Replace libpng-dev with libpng3-dev.
> How would that help things? It seems to me that from the log, the
> problem isn't my build-dep, but rather that libpng3 "is not going to be
On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 09:26, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Replace libpng-dev with libpng3-dev.
How would that help things? It seems to me that from the log, the
problem isn't my build-dep, but rather that libpng3 "is not going to be
installed":
> Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencie
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 09:24:51AM -0400, Michael Furr wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> My package of vegastrike is stuck in the autobuilders. The problem lies
> in its build-dep on libpng-dev. It needs to use version 3 of the lib.
> I read all of the recent discussions on -devel about this issue but seem
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 08:52:01AM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 12:24 -0500, Mark Brown wrote:
> > This is an error. *Nothing* outside of /etc should be a conffile. See
> > policy 11.7.2.
> We're talking about conffiles here. Please see Policy 11.7.1: Definitions
Hi all,
My package of vegastrike is stuck in the autobuilders. The problem lies
in its build-dep on libpng-dev. It needs to use version 3 of the lib.
I read all of the recent discussions on -devel about this issue but seem
to have missed the bottom line. How do I remedy this?
Do I just email
"Stefan Schwandter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could someone, who is interested in getting snd compile on non-i386
> arches maybe, please upload my latest snd and snd-motif packages?
Err, never mind, today I got a response from my sponsor...
regards, Stefan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 08:52:01AM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 12:24 -0500, Mark Brown wrote:
> > This is an error. *Nothing* outside of /etc should be a conffile. See
> > policy 11.7.2.
> We're talking about conffiles here. Please see Policy 11.7.1: Definition
Quoting Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2002-07-30 05:59:10 BST):
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 06:14:55PM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
>
> > I don't agree with you here. When you have games that use high scores
> > files, these are placed in /var as per FHS 5.4
> > (http://www.debian.org/doc/pac
Hello!
Could someone, who is interested in getting snd compile on non-i386
arches maybe, please upload my latest snd and snd-motif packages?
I have got them ready for quite some time now, but my usual sponsor
has been unresponsive for a while, he probably doesn't have time
to do it.
The package
Goswin> An even better way would be the following:
Goswin> 1. keep the original book.
Goswin> 2. put newly learned stuff into a different file, a book-diff one
Goswin>could say. This could be in ~/.crafty/ or next to the original book
Goswin>depending on a debconf question and overridable
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 12:24 -0500, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 06:14:55PM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> > I don't agree with you here. When you have games that use high scores
> > files, these are placed in /var as per FHS 5.4
> > (http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manual
Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm the maintainer of crafty, a chess engine
> (http://packages.debian.org/crafty).
>
> When you install crafty for the first time, it installed compiled
> opening books in /var/lib/crafty. Then, as it plays against you, it
> 'l
Quoting Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2002-07-30 05:59:10 BST):
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 06:14:55PM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
>
> > I don't agree with you here. When you have games that use high scores
> > files, these are placed in /var as per FHS 5.4
> > (http://www.debian.org/doc/pa
Hello!
Could someone, who is interested in getting snd compile on non-i386
arches maybe, please upload my latest snd and snd-motif packages?
I have got them ready for quite some time now, but my usual sponsor
has been unresponsive for a while, he probably doesn't have time
to do it.
The packag
Goswin> An even better way would be the following:
Goswin> 1. keep the original book.
Goswin> 2. put newly learned stuff into a different file, a book-diff one
Goswin>could say. This could be in ~/.crafty/ or next to the original book
Goswin>depending on a debconf question and overridabl
26 matches
Mail list logo
