Le Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 08:09:56PM -0400, sbt écrivait:
Hi,
Hi,
I am not (yet) a developer and have indicated my intention to adopt the
recently-orphaned package xeuklides to start the process of becoming
one. In the process of making the simple changes to adopt it, I
discovered that
Hi,
I wish to contact a sponsor to help me to finalize packaging of the
mathematical web WIMS server, due to Gang XIAO. (see
http://wims.unice.fr)
The upstream sources have been patched to use PNG/MNG graphic formats,
some utilities due to Gang XIAO have been extracted to separate
packages.
I'll sponsor you. Do you want to meet on irc to discuss?
jos
On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 09:42, Georges Khaznadar wrote:
Hi,
I wish to contact a sponsor to help me to finalize packaging of the
mathematical web WIMS server, due to Gang XIAO. (see
http://wims.unice.fr)
The upstream sources
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 09:43:56AM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
This is a good reason for not using debconf.
The interface between a program and libraries it uses should be defined, and
it should be designed in a way to minimise harm to other programs.
* #50595: debconf: Use of
Matthias Urlichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Paul Cupis:
apt-get install libtool
And don't forget add 'libtool' to the Build-Depends: line(s) in
debian/control.
Normally, however, the libtool in /usr/bin is *not* invoked during
build, but the libtool script in the source. So if
I got through my other errors with help from responses from the prior
thread -- thanks;)
Now, I don't know if make dies because of a missing header file i.e.
incorrect gcc directory includes or something else. i couldn't find
freecdbmake.h in the source tree however there is a libvpopmail-dev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 02 October 2002 20:29, justin cunningham wrote:
/bin/sh ./libtool --mode=compile gcc -I. -Icdb -g -O2 -Wall -c
vauth.c
rm -f .libs/vauth.lo
gcc -I. -Icdb -g -O2 -Wall -c vauth.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/vauth.lo
vauth.c:40:
One of my packages just changed its icon from an xpm to png. I was all
for it until I saw lintian complain:
W: terminatorx: menu-icon-not-in-xpm-format
/usr/share/pixmaps/terminatorX-app.png
Do we ship wm's that can't handle pngs, but do handle our menu system?
The menu sub-policy doesn't
On Wednesday 02 October 2002 14:57, Mike Furr wrote:
One of my packages just changed its icon from an xpm to png. I was all
for it until I saw lintian complain:
W: terminatorx: menu-icon-not-in-xpm-format
/usr/share/pixmaps/terminatorX-app.png
Do we ship wm's that can't handle pngs, but do
On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 18:13, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
menu policy section 3.4.
Ah didn't actually check the menu package. Then it seems
www.debian.org/devel is severely out of date as it only has 2
sections(or something wonky happened at generation), as well as its link
to
Hello everyone,
I am writing to request a sponsor as part of my nm process. I am
currently awaiting DAM approval, but I need a package sponsored if
possible. I have asked in the past, but this time am requesting someone
to look over my basic packaging practices.
I have a
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 08:15:39AM +0200, Zeno Davatz wrote:
On 2.10.2002 5:18 Uhr, Graham Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
do you mean where you want the package to install to (as opposed to
build directory)? if that is the case, use the --root and --admindir
options to dpkg(1). see the
MÒ
X@³j
¦Lðó]µÈ¢ûͺÌAhXðNbNµÄ¾³¢B
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
±Ìy[WÍêTÔÅÁŵܷB
}t@iª½ÜçÈD«Èl
Ǥ¼A±±Ö
ÔÈ¢·èÌîñàèÉüéæI
¡úàLLÅ¢±¤I
âÎÉ«pµÈ¢Å¾³¢B
http://goold-bb.com/
On 3.10.2002 1:26 Uhr, Graham Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what version of apache are you using?
Apache 1.3.26 and mod_ssl2.8.10
We used the apache-ssl 1.3.26.1+1.47-2 version of Debian but found that some
things just do not want to work with that version, ie. Server status.
in the version
On 2.10.2002 5:18 Uhr, Graham Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
do you mean where you want the package to install to (as opposed to
build directory)? if that is the case, use the --root and --admindir
options to dpkg(1). see the man page for more information.
No.
With dpkg-buildpackage
Le Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 08:09:56PM -0400, sbt écrivait:
Hi,
Hi,
I am not (yet) a developer and have indicated my intention to adopt the
recently-orphaned package xeuklides to start the process of becoming
one. In the process of making the simple changes to adopt it, I
discovered that
Hi,
I wish to contact a sponsor to help me to finalize packaging of the
mathematical web WIMS server, due to Gang XIAO. (see
http://wims.unice.fr)
The upstream sources have been patched to use PNG/MNG graphic formats,
some utilities due to Gang XIAO have been extracted to separate
packages.
I'll sponsor you. Do you want to meet on irc to discuss?
jos
On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 09:42, Georges Khaznadar wrote:
Hi,
I wish to contact a sponsor to help me to finalize packaging of the
mathematical web WIMS server, due to Gang XIAO. (see
http://wims.unice.fr)
The upstream sources have
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 09:43:56AM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
This is a good reason for not using debconf.
The interface between a program and libraries it uses should be defined, and
it should be designed in a way to minimise harm to other programs.
* #50595: debconf: Use of
Matthias Urlichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Paul Cupis:
apt-get install libtool
And don't forget add 'libtool' to the Build-Depends: line(s) in
debian/control.
Normally, however, the libtool in /usr/bin is *not* invoked during
build, but the libtool script in the source. So if
I got through my other errors with help from responses from the prior
thread -- thanks;)
Now, I don't know if make dies because of a missing header file i.e.
incorrect gcc directory includes or something else. i couldn't find
freecdbmake.h in the source tree however there is a libvpopmail-dev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 02 October 2002 20:29, justin cunningham wrote:
/bin/sh ./libtool --mode=compile gcc -I. -Icdb -g -O2 -Wall -c
vauth.c
rm -f .libs/vauth.lo
gcc -I. -Icdb -g -O2 -Wall -c vauth.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/vauth.lo
vauth.c:40:
One of my packages just changed its icon from an xpm to png. I was all
for it until I saw lintian complain:
W: terminatorx: menu-icon-not-in-xpm-format
/usr/share/pixmaps/terminatorX-app.png
Do we ship wm's that can't handle pngs, but do handle our menu system?
The menu sub-policy doesn't
Please could someone sponsor an upload of IJS?
The source is available from
http://www.whinlatter.uklinux.net/ijs/
as well as i386 binaries.
(http://www.whinlatter.uklinux.net/ijs/ijs_0.34-1.dsc)
Many thanks,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Liberty and Livelihood - Support the
On Wednesday 02 October 2002 14:57, Mike Furr wrote:
One of my packages just changed its icon from an xpm to png. I was all
for it until I saw lintian complain:
W: terminatorx: menu-icon-not-in-xpm-format
/usr/share/pixmaps/terminatorX-app.png
Do we ship wm's that can't handle pngs, but do
On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 18:13, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
menu policy section 3.4.
Ah didn't actually check the menu package. Then it seems
www.debian.org/devel is severely out of date as it only has 2
sections(or something wonky happened at generation), as well as its link
to
Hello everyone,
I am writing to request a sponsor as part of my nm process. I am
currently awaiting DAM approval, but I need a package sponsored if
possible. I have asked in the past, but this time am requesting someone
to look over my basic packaging practices.
I have a
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 08:15:39AM +0200, Zeno Davatz wrote:
On 2.10.2002 5:18 Uhr, Graham Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
do you mean where you want the package to install to (as opposed to
build directory)? if that is the case, use the --root and --admindir
options to dpkg(1). see the man
MÒ
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
¦Lðó]µÈ¢ûͺÌAhXðNbNµÄ¾³¢B
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
±Ìy[WÍêTÔÅÁŵܷB
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ǥ¼A±±Ö
ÔÈ¢·èÌîñàèÉüéæI
¡úàLLÅ¢±¤I
âÎÉ«pµÈ¢Å¾³¢B
http://goold-bb.com/
29 matches
Mail list logo
