On Thu, 24 Apr 2003, Barry deFreese wrote:
I was wondering since you were all so helpful about my earlier
programming questions if you wouldn't mind a question about Operating
System books. I am currently considering the following:
Operating System Concepts - 6th Edition Abraham
Modern Operating Systems - 2nd Edition Andrew Tanenbaum. Well
reviewed.
Tanenbaum is a leading author in the field (as well as network theory). I
wouldn't discount this book in a hurry. Does it have the OS reviews in it,
though?
this one is used as the OS book in many colleges.
Hi Deedra,
would you mind to tell us in which area you live? I don't exclude
the possibility of a DD just passing by or something like similar.
Thanks
Fabio
On Thu, 24 Apr 2003, Deedra Waters wrote:
I filled out the application to become a debian developer last night. I
have
On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 08:40:09PM -0700, Barry deFreese wrote:
I was wondering since you were all so helpful about my earlier
programming questions if you wouldn't mind a question about Operating
System books. I am currently considering the following:
www.kernelnewbies.org/books.php3
Hello,
I'm trying to build a package. There is the dependency ${shlibs::Depends}
in debian/control. On my machine I run unstable. Because of this, the
package built with dpkg-buildpackage needs a libc6 (= 2.3.1-1). I want to
install this package on systems running stable. At those hosts, I only
On 20030425T105530+0200, Ottavio Campana wrote:
I personally dislike Modern Operating Systems, I've read it and I didn't
enjoy it. The last version of the book is much less tecnichal than the
previous one, the so called Operating Systems. To give you the idea,
Modern Operating Systems
I am looking for a sponsor for the Net::NBName Perl module, not currently in
the Debian archive. My package can be found at
deb http://henry.methody.org/debian sid official
deb-src http://henry.methody.org/debian sid official
Package: libnet-nbname-perl
Version: 0.24-1
Section: perl
Is there any way of requesting the BTS to move a package from Requested to
Can't be packaged? I was investigating packaging VisualBoyAdvance a gameboy
advance emulator, but it looks like license problems will make it impossible to
include in debian.
Cheers
Andy
Hi Holger!
You wrote:
When I use pbuilder, I get a package that could be installed on woody. The
problem is, that the files are not signed.
You can use debsign to sign the package after building.
--
Kind regards,
++
| Bas
Hi andy.grafham!
You wrote:
Is there any way of requesting the BTS to move a package from
Requested to Can't be packaged? I was investigating packaging
VisualBoyAdvance a gameboy advance emulator, but it looks like
license problems will make it impossible to include in debian.
AFAIK, there
I second that.
But maybe we still need a canonical list of problematic packages, and
the CBP status would only be aplicable to inform wannabe packagers that
there's an ongoing analysis on the packagability of that software.
On second thought, I'm not sure it would be worth it, but I like the
___
/ Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| AFAIK, there is no automatic way of doing this. What about adding a
| new tag, something like CBP (cannot be packaged), to the wnpp?
Why not simply close the bug and give an explanation?
--
Dear Mentors,
Due to the WNPP the package 'taper' is orphaned for quite a long period
of time. According to Martin Michlmayrs posting in debian-devel, the packet
will be removed from Debian if nobody volunteers to become the new
maintainer. I use taper and think it would be a pity to loose this
I'M IN JAIL.
That's right. I got put in jail. All
because I went in to the Rabbit yard
and ate a rose bush and a few small
trees. I wasn't the one who
broke in in the first place. It was
The Devil. That's right. The Devil
now lives here. All I did was follow
him in. Now I'm in jail till the
On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 02:23:29PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
___
/ Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| AFAIK, there is no automatic way of doing this. What about adding a
| new tag, something like CBP (cannot be packaged), to
Hi,
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
/ Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| AFAIK, there is no automatic way of doing this. What about adding a
| new tag, something like CBP (cannot be packaged), to the wnpp?
Why not simply close the bug and give an explanation?
Because - when it really cannot
Rene Tschirley [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
If still nobody volunteered, I would.
The Applicant's Checklist requires me to find an advocate before applying
to become a new maintainer. I contacted the current maintainer, Piotr
Roszatycki, some days ago, but didn't receive an answer. If somebody
Hi,
On Fri, 25 Apr 2003 10:21:56 +, andy.grafha wrote:
Is there any way of requesting the BTS to move a package from Requested
to Can't be packaged? I was investigating packaging VisualBoyAdvance a
gameboy advance emulator, but it looks like license problems will make it
impossible to
On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 04:41:27PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
/ Bas Zoetekouw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| AFAIK, there is no automatic way of doing this. What about adding a
| new tag, something like CBP (cannot be packaged), to the wnpp?
Why not simply close
I plan to go get wasted tomorrow night,
burn down a few buildings, and raise some
heck. Anyone want to join me?
Anthony Hurd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'M IN JAIL.
That's right. I got put in jail. All
because I went in to the Rabbit yard
and ate a rose bush and a few small
trees. I wasn't the one who
broke in in the first place. It was
The Devil. That's right. The Devil
now lives here. All I did
-Original Message-
From: Anthony Hurd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 10:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: drinking
I plan to go get wasted tomorrow night,
burn down a few buildings, and raise some
heck. Anyone
On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 12:55:50PM -0400, Anthony Hurd wrote:
I plan to go get wasted tomorrow night,
burn down a few buildings, and raise some
heck. Anyone want to join me?
Where do you live?
-Josh
--
New PGP public key: 0x27AFC3EE
pgpZa4YY3EFcd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
What would be the proper procedure for requesting an NMU? Assuming
that all the conditions are met as described in
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-nmu and
it's sub sections, except that the person desiring the NMU is not a debian
developer, would it be
Neil L. Roeth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
IANAE, but I just went through a package cleaning up the library and rpath
handling, so perhaps I can offer some help.
Thanks!
I would start by cleansing your makefiles of any explicit mention of /usr/lib,
/lib, and any other directories listed in
On Fri, 25 Apr 2003, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
What would be the proper procedure for requesting an NMU? Assuming
that all the conditions are met as described in
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-nmu and
it's sub sections, except that the person desiring
On Fri, 25 Apr 2003, Rene Tschirley wrote:
Due to the WNPP the package 'taper' is orphaned for quite a long period
of time. According to Martin Michlmayrs posting in debian-devel, the packet
will be removed from Debian if nobody volunteers to become the new
maintainer. I use taper and think
On Apr 25, Roger Leigh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Neil L. Roeth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
IANAE, but I just went through a package cleaning up the library and rpath
handling, so perhaps I can offer some help.
Thanks!
I would start by cleansing your makefiles of any explicit
28 matches
Mail list logo
