-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ivo Marino wrote:
Checking application/pgp-signature: FAILURE
- -- Start of PGP signed section.
On Tue, 13 May 2003, Matthew Palmer wrote:
It appears as though anyone who has an account can upload any package they
like. While this isn't a
On Tue, 13 May 2003, Daniel K. Gebhart wrote:
Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote Tue, May 13, 2003 at 08:36:12AM
+1000:
*very* serious problem for anyone who starts relying on the binary packages
uploaded to m.d.n. What sort of protections do you have in place or plan to
put in
On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 10:48:03PM +0200, Daniel K. Gebhart wrote:
---
Debian Mentors Project
The mentors core-team is:
Christoph Haas (ChrisH)[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ivo Marino (eim) [EMAIL
Hello out there!
I use Debian GNU/Linux since quite some time now and want to package SGI's failsafe (Bug #126514), which seems to be the most complete and mature HA-solution for GNU.
But i've problems to compile failsafe-mgr, the graphical GUI (written in Java) for configuring the cluster.
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 01:29:00AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 05:41:40PM -0600, Jack Moffitt wrote:
Perhaps an easy thing to do would just be to show whether or not a
pckage is signed by a key which is signed by a real debian developer.
Surely getting that signature
what can I do?
I do not recognise the error, I would suggest you try a crash test in
the GNU/autotools, which is never a bad idea for a develper anyway.
This is an overview:
http://lesbos.esat.kuleuven.ac.be/~mleeman/downloads/athens-opensource-0.4.pdf
--
greetz, marc
because of
Hi, Anthony...
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 03:51:42PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Uh, as far as I can tell, of the above only Daniel is even in the
n-m queue; Christoph, Ivo and Christoph appear to not be developers,
applicants, or even sponsored maintainers of any packages in the archive.
You
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 08:30:03AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 01:29:00AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 05:41:40PM -0600, Jack Moffitt wrote:
Perhaps an easy thing to do would just be to show whether or not a
pckage is signed by a key which is
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 03:51:42PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Daniel K. Gebhart (con-fuse) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Christoph Siess (CHS) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why are we giving debian.net addresses to people who don't want to go
through the pain of authenticating themselves to
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 10:02:11AM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
Please bear with me but from what I was told by a number of package
maintainers it is a really long way until one has become a DD. Just
because Daniel was assigned an AM does not mean there is a guarantee he
will get his DD access
Hi,
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 04:34:08AM -0500, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 10:02:11AM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
Please bear with me but from what I was told by a number of package
maintainers it is a really long way until one has become a DD. Just
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 03:51:42PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 10:48:03PM +0200, Daniel K. Gebhart wrote:
---
Debian Mentors Project
The mentors core-team is:
Christoph Haas (ChrisH)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Emile,
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 12:07:12PM +0200, Emile van Bergen wrote:
I think there is a niche for such non-DD contributors. Not only in
bugreporting and bugfixing, but also in packaging work.
I would not emphasize on DD vs. non-DD but on
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 10:02:11AM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
You are right. I do plan to apply in a few weeks. However the service
was created especially for people who e.g. have written an application
themselves and do not care about becoming a DD.
Is that such a good thing? It might get
Christoph Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However the service
was created especially for people who e.g. have written an application
themselves and do not care about becoming a DD.
I object to the conept of people who do not care about
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 04:38:00PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
Hello,
ldapsearch does not work for me anymore with db.debian.org:
(both woody and sid version)
$ cat ~/.ldaprc
HOST db.debian.org
BASE dc=debian,dc=org
$ ldapsearch uid=ballombe
ldap_sasl_interactive_bind_s: No such
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 04:38:00PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
ldapsearch does not work for me anymore with db.debian.org:
(both woody and sid version)
$ cat ~/.ldaprc
HOST db.debian.org
BASE dc=debian,dc=org
$ ldapsearch uid=ballombe
ldap_sasl_interactive_bind_s: No such object
Is it
Hi,
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 09:48:49AM -0500, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 12:07:12PM +0200, Emile van Bergen wrote:
[...]
Regardless, I actually think it's a wonderful scaleability measure
to provide some infrastructure that allows DDs to delegate some of
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 08:22:48AM +0200, Matthias Hofer wrote:
./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc
but when I after all give ./configure, the is an error:
loading cache ./config.cache
./configure: line 534: syntax error near unexpected token
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 05:41:12PM +0200, Emile van Bergen wrote:
That's not mutually exclusive. Also, you ask who would ever wish to
delegate the maintainership of a package. I think the answer is every DD
who has filed a RFA on a package.
RFA is a Request For Adoption, not a delegation.
On Tue, 13 May 2003 14:11:05 +0200
Bastian Kleineidam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
If there are people willing to adopt a package, they should start
renaming the O: bug to an ITA:. If the bug is still O:, there is
nobody caring for that packge.
I have attempted to indicate my willingness to
I'm glad to see this service.
The Developer's Reference lists
http://www.internatif.org/bortzmeyer/debian/sponsor/ as being a place to
co-ordinate the sponsoring of packages. Currently it's unavailable to me
(down?). Other problems I have with it include: no place to upload
packages and it's for
On Saturday 10 May 2003 05:43 am, José Luis Tallón wrote:
It needs to be able to run cdrecord / mkisofs / growisofs / ... and access
the devices with the unprivileged user it runs as.
Your approach would help if the upstream did not check the permissions to
ensure they are SUID root, mode
Matthias Hofer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But i've problems to compile failsafe-mgr, the graphical GUI (written in
Java) for configuring the cluster.
There is no configure-script out of the box, the doc says to give
aclocal
autoheader
automake --add-missing
autoconf
Hi Daniel,
On Mon, 12 May 2003, Daniel K. Gebhart wrote:
We are very proud to announce the opening of the mentors project. We
have been working very hard[1] on this project since beginning of 2003.
Now the time has come to test and use it!
Really nice job but the first side effect is
Hi, Fabio...
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 10:16:38PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
Really nice job but the first side effect is already there:
Package: icaclient
Thanks for the hint. That was a test package I was uploading to stress
test the dupload process on the server. It wasn't really
Hi,
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
Really nice job but the first side effect is already there:
Package: icaclient
Version: 6.30-2
Priority: optional
Section: net
Maintainer: Christoph Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Depends: libxaw7
And that looks like it is f*cked. Is this Depends: done
Hi,
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 10:16:38PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote:
I think upload must be moderated somehow. Even the uploader himself claim
that he is unsure about licence of the product.
Well, if the packages can only be downloaded by registered DDs, then the
problem's solved I'd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Folks!
Thanks to the aid of mentors.debian.net, my adopted and bugfixed packages are
now downloadable at:
deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main
apt-get source pysol pysol-cardsets pysol-sound-server
But I'm still
Hello,
I've run lintian and linda on the latest eclipse packages.
eclipse contains some jni libs, which are placed in /usr/lib/jni and
lintian/linda complains, that they are not linked against libc:
W: libswt-java: library-not-linked-against-libc
Hello,
I'm the new maintainer of eclipse, a IDE written in java.
Eclipse is currently put into /usr/lib/eclipse directory, as eclipse
contains some JNI code, which is arch dependent. JNI nativ libs
(*so) are put into /usr/lib/jni (reusable parts: SWT) and subdirs
of /usr/lib/eclipse (File
On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 11:40:04PM -0400, Joe Nahmias wrote:
If I may make a suggestion, a user should only be able to upload a
package that either:
a) doesn't appear in the repository
- -or-
b) already has the uploader as maintainer
- -or-
c) has a RFA/O bug filed in WNPP
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 01:13:42AM +0200, Jan Schulz wrote:
My current thinking is, that I will change the base directory from
/usr/lib/eclipse to /usr/share/eclipse, but will put all 'arch
dependet' code (about 10 files from various places) directly into
/usr/lib/eclipse and then set
On Mon, 12 May 2003, tony mancill wrote:
Appropos of this and Colin's statement, my suggestion is to make only a
deb-src URL available on the site, and to only host source packages. For
That would be one way to solve the problem.
packages destined for the Debian archive, it's critical that
34 matches
Mail list logo
