Hi,
Eduard Bloch wrote:
Doesn't work, changes in the script are needed because of the new
parameter syntax.
What do you mean, doesn't work? I changed the script to conform to the new
parameter syntax -- packaging things which aren't tested and can't work isn't
my style. ;-)
The script does
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 08:04:12PM +0800, Wang WenRui wrote:
There is an agrep package already in Debian:
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=agrepsearchon=namessubword=1version=allrelease=all
Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 09:50:18PM +0100, Matt Ryan wrote:
Adam Heath wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jul 2003, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
2000-12-17 - Eray Ozkural [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://nm.debian.org/nmstatus.php?email=erayo%40cs.bilkent.edu.tr
* DAM Comment: Have asked applicant to get 5
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
There is an agrep package already in Debian:
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=agrepsearchon=namessubword=1version=allrelease=all
Of course it is this package.
Huh? This package is *not*
Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
A little bit more information would be appreciated.
Please make yourself familiar with some of the ideas behind Debian. (Read the Social
Contract, DFSG, ...)
agrep is in non-free, non-free is not part of Debian as is explained in the social
contract
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
A little bit more information would be appreciated.
Well, you just failed Debian Philosophy 101.
Hint: non-free is not part of Debian, it merely uses Debian's
infrastructure.
- Matt
--
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
There is an agrep package already in Debian:
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=agrepsearchon=namessubword=1version=allrelease=all
Of course it is
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
A little bit more information would be appreciated.
Well, you just failed Debian Philosophy 101.
Hint: non-free is not part of Debian, it merely uses Debian's
infrastructure.
Well I
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 04:04:46PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
mizar:[~] apt-cache show agrep G Section
Section: non-free/text
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-resources.en.html#s4.6.1
So what? In the first sentence quoted, in
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 03:54:32PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
A little bit more information would be appreciated.
Well, you just failed Debian Philosophy 101.
Hint: non-free is
Luk Claes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Well I know all this. But I ment I want to have more information how it
will practically go. Does the patent problems have any implication on the
upload (to non-free)?
Yes.
What am I supposed to do with the package or the patent issues?
See if the package
Hi !
A license change in kanjidic and edict packages will allow
them to move to main. Also, xjdic which is in contrib will
also move to main (and maybe other packages depending on
edict and kanjidic).
I've uploaded the new edict package yesterday, and I received
a message saying that 'edict is
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 21:45 +0200, Sergio Suarez wrote:
Hi Im new in debian develop and want adopt the orphan package zed, I =
need a sponsor
Package name: zed
Package description: Powerful, multipurpose, configurable text editor
Hi, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
Read the developer's reference, repackage zed and you will be ready to ask
for a sponsor.
... but, next time, please don't all-caps-ify the subject.
Thanks.
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Disclaimer: The quote
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 06:58:06AM +1000, An?bal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 21:45 +0200, Sergio Suarez wrote:
Hi Im new in debian develop and want adopt the orphan package zed, I =
need a sponsor
Package name: zed
Package description: Powerful, multipurpose,
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, David B Harris wrote:
Hardly. Every Debian Developer has the ability to run arbitrary code as
root on everybody's system. Do you want to try and make the argument
that regardless of whether the person has proved spiteful, unstable,
mean, and just generally a jackass ...
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 21:33:11 -0700 (PDT)
tony mancill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, this thread should probably be on newmaint, so I'm cross-posting
it there. Please follow-up on newmaint.
Replied to debian-newmaint@lists.debian.org, Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpbV9LOVYaBg.pgp
Hi,
Eduard Bloch wrote:
Doesn't work, changes in the script are needed because of the new
parameter syntax.
What do you mean, doesn't work? I changed the script to conform to the new
parameter syntax -- packaging things which aren't tested and can't work isn't
my style. ;-)
The script does
Hi,
There is an agrep package already in Debian:
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=agrepsearchon=namessubword=1version=allrelease=all
Is this the same as yours?
Best regards
Wang WenRui
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 06:21:58PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Hi
I am
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 09:50:18PM +0100, Matt Ryan wrote:
Adam Heath wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jul 2003, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
2000-12-17 - Eray Ozkural [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://nm.debian.org/nmstatus.php?email=erayo%40cs.bilkent.edu.tr
* DAM Comment: Have asked applicant to get 5
There is an agrep package already in Debian:
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=agrepsearchon=namessubword=1version=allrelease=all
Of course it is this package.
Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
A little bit more information would be
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
There is an agrep package already in Debian:
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=agrepsearchon=namessubword=1version=allrelease=all
Of course it is this package.
Huh? This package is *not*
Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
A little bit more information would be appreciated.
Please make yourself familiar with some of the ideas behind Debian. (Read the
Social
Contract, DFSG, ...)
agrep is in non-free, non-free is not part of Debian as is explained in the
social
contract
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
A little bit more information would be appreciated.
Well, you just failed Debian Philosophy 101.
Hint: non-free is not part of Debian, it merely uses Debian's
infrastructure.
- Matt
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
There is an agrep package already in Debian:
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=agrepsearchon=namessubword=1version=allrelease=all
Of course it is
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
A little bit more information would be appreciated.
Well, you just failed Debian Philosophy 101.
Hint: non-free is not part of Debian, it merely uses Debian's
infrastructure.
Well I
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 04:04:46PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
mizar:[~] apt-cache show agrep G Section
Section: non-free/text
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-resources.en.html#s4.6.1
So what? In the first sentence quoted, in
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 03:54:32PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
A little bit more information would be appreciated.
Well, you just failed Debian Philosophy 101.
Hint: non-free is
Luk Claes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Well I know all this. But I ment I want to have more information how it
will practically go. Does the patent problems have any implication on the
upload (to non-free)?
Yes.
What am I supposed to do with the package or the patent issues?
See if the package
Hi !
A license change in kanjidic and edict packages will allow
them to move to main. Also, xjdic which is in contrib will
also move to main (and maybe other packages depending on
edict and kanjidic).
I've uploaded the new edict package yesterday, and I received
a message saying that 'edict is
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Matt Ryan wrote:
Adam Heath wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jul 2003, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
2000-12-17 - Eray Ozkural [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://nm.debian.org/nmstatus.php?email=erayo%40cs.bilkent.edu.tr
* DAM Comment: Have asked applicant to get 5 sponsors.
Read
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 01:03:36PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Matt Ryan wrote:
Adam Heath wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jul 2003, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
2000-12-17 - Eray Ozkural [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://nm.debian.org/nmstatus.php?email=erayo%40cs.bilkent.edu.tr
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 21:45 +0200, Sergio Suarez wrote:
Hi Im new in debian develop and want adopt the orphan package zed, I =
need a sponsor
Package name: zed
Package description: Powerful, multipurpose, configurable text editor
Hi, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
Read the developer's reference, repackage zed and you will be ready to ask
for a sponsor.
... but, next time, please don't all-caps-ify the subject.
Thanks.
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Disclaimer: The quote
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 06:58:06AM +1000, An?bal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 21:45 +0200, Sergio Suarez wrote:
Hi Im new in debian develop and want adopt the orphan package zed, I =
need a sponsor
Package name: zed
Package description: Powerful, multipurpose,
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 23:50 +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
but, next time, please don't all-caps-ify the subject.
It wasn't me. Please, look at the first message of this thread and see
who is responsible for doing that.
Kind regards,
Aníbal
--
.''`. Debian GNU/Linux | Building
36 matches
Mail list logo
