Re: Multi-person sponsorship

On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 10:08:34AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote: Matthew Palmer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: 2) Download tracking, both by count and yes I'll upload this via web browser. I'm still up in the air about whether there will be apt-getable resources, or whether pre-built binary debs

Re: Multi-person sponsorship

Matthew Palmer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: 4) Automatically removing packages once they've been uploaded seems to be a general winner. Couldn't you just reference packages.d.o (or a local Packages/Sources file)? Sorry, I don't understand this. Are you suggesting that I scan an updated Packages

ITP: hoz -- a file splitter with GTK interface

Hi, I intend to package hoz, here is the summary. Package name: hoz Version : 1.65 Upstream Author : Gustavo Picon [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL : http://hoz.sourceforge.net/ License : GPL Description : A file splitter with GTK interface HOZ is what you

Re: RFS: irssi-scripts -- useful collection of scripts for irssi

Florian Ernst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Description : useful collection of scripts for irssi How does it feel, putting together one of the 24 useful packages? (SCNR, I know that you didn't make that up.) Should I rather explain the dependencies for each single one of these 23 demanding

Re: Multi-person sponsorship

On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 06:42:42PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 10:08:34AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote: Maybe you could also reuse / build upon rene from the dak suite. (Maybe it's not That's the problem with the FTP masters naming everything after women - nobody

Re: Multi-person sponsorship

On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 08:23:05AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote: It'll probably be more timely and less bandwidth intensive to track -changes... Well, I mostly have Packages/Sources for unstable available. In my book, I prefer parsing those over automatically processing email. Also, it doesn't

Re: Multi-person sponsorship

On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 09:39:31AM +, Colin Watson wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 06:42:42PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 10:08:34AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote: Maybe you could also reuse / build upon rene from the dak suite. (Maybe it's not That's the

Re: RFS: irssi-scripts -- useful collection of scripts for irssi

Hello Thomas! On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 08:42:11AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote: Florian Ernst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Description : useful collection of scripts for irssi How does it feel, putting together one of the 24 useful packages? (SCNR, I know that you didn't make that up.) Oh,

Re: RFS: irssi-scripts -- useful collection of scripts for irssi

Florian Ernst [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Checking on Woody won't be necessary, since this package will never make it to Woody. Or did I misunderstand you here? Remember backports. Nobody knows when sarge will be released, and since these scripts are so *useful* ;-), it might be that somebody

Re: Multi-person sponsorship

Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 11:21:11PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: Matthew Palmer wrote: So, comments, brickbats, acclaim, whatever. Throw it at me. Well I don't think that this system as described would be of any use to me. I want to maintain a

Re: Multi-person sponsorship

Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 08:23:05AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote: It'll probably be more timely and less bandwidth intensive to track -changes... Well, I mostly have Packages/Sources for unstable available. In my book, I prefer parsing those over

Re: GNU polyxmass: brand new lintian-linda-clean packages

Hi, Filippo! So, it is GNU polyxmass, now? You are an official GNU project and all. Congratulations. (We'll continue the rest of the discussion by private mail, shall we?) On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 10:19:45AM +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote: Apart from those lintian W/E messages, the packages are

Re: Multi-person sponsorship

Matthew Palmer wrote: package I sponsor. I want to know if they are not able to send me a package that will build properly. I want to work with them and be Since you only get packages for sponsorship which have built in a clean sid chroot out of my system, you can be fairly sure of that.

Re: RFS: irssi-scripts -- useful collection of scripts for irssi

Hello Frank! On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 12:39:04PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: Florian Ernst [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Checking on Woody won't be necessary, since this package will never make it to Woody. Or did I misunderstand you here? Remember backports. Nobody knows when sarge will be released,

RFS: New version of cvs-autoreleasedeb

I'm looking for a sponsor for the version 0.5-1 of cvs-autoreleasedeb that already is into the archive. The files to upload are available at sourceforge https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=57915package_id=53579release_id=218237 Description: Automatically release/upload debian

$BL$>5Bz9-9p"((B

$B!c;v6H

Re: Multi-person sponsorship

On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 01:05:08PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: Matthew Palmer wrote: package I sponsor. I want to know if they are not able to send me a package that will build properly. I want to work with them and be Since you only get packages for sponsorship which have built in a clean

Re: Multi-person sponsorship

Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 01:05:08PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: Matthew Palmer wrote: package I sponsor. I want to know if they are not able to send me a package that will build properly. I want to work with them and be Since you only get

Re: Multi-person sponsorship

On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 11:21:11PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: Matthew Palmer wrote: So, comments, brickbats, acclaim, whatever. Throw it at me. Well I don't think that this system as described would be of any use to me. I want to maintain a close relationship with the people whose A worthy

Re: Multi-person sponsorship

On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 10:08:34AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote: Matthew Palmer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: 2) Download tracking, both by count and yes I'll upload this via web browser. I'm still up in the air about whether there will be apt-getable resources, or whether pre-built binary debs

Re: Multi-person sponsorship

Matthew Palmer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: 4) Automatically removing packages once they've been uploaded seems to be a general winner. Couldn't you just reference packages.d.o (or a local Packages/Sources file)? Sorry, I don't understand this. Are you suggesting that I scan an updated Packages

ITP: hoz -- a file splitter with GTK interface

Hi, I intend to package hoz, here is the summary. Package name: hoz Version : 1.65 Upstream Author : Gustavo Picon [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL : http://hoz.sourceforge.net/ License : GPL Description : A file splitter with GTK interface HOZ is what you

Re: RFS: irssi-scripts -- useful collection of scripts for irssi

Florian Ernst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Description : useful collection of scripts for irssi How does it feel, putting together one of the 24 useful packages? (SCNR, I know that you didn't make that up.) Should I rather explain the dependencies for each single one of these 23 demanding

Re: Multi-person sponsorship

On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 06:42:42PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 10:08:34AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote: Maybe you could also reuse / build upon rene from the dak suite. (Maybe it's not That's the problem with the FTP masters naming everything after women - nobody

Re: Multi-person sponsorship

On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 08:23:05AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote: It'll probably be more timely and less bandwidth intensive to track -changes... Well, I mostly have Packages/Sources for unstable available. In my book, I prefer parsing those over automatically processing email. Also, it

Re: Multi-person sponsorship

On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 09:39:31AM +, Colin Watson wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 06:42:42PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 10:08:34AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote: Maybe you could also reuse / build upon rene from the dak suite. (Maybe it's not That's the

Re: RFS: irssi-scripts -- useful collection of scripts for irssi

Hello Thomas! On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 08:42:11AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote: Florian Ernst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Description : useful collection of scripts for irssi How does it feel, putting together one of the 24 useful packages? (SCNR, I know that you didn't make that up.)

Re: RFS: irssi-scripts -- useful collection of scripts for irssi

Florian Ernst [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Checking on Woody won't be necessary, since this package will never make it to Woody. Or did I misunderstand you here? Remember backports. Nobody knows when sarge will be released, and since these scripts are so *useful* ;-), it might be that somebody

Re: Multi-person sponsorship

Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 08:23:05AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote: It'll probably be more timely and less bandwidth intensive to track -changes... Well, I mostly have Packages/Sources for unstable available. In my book, I prefer parsing those

Re: Multi-person sponsorship

Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 11:21:11PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: Matthew Palmer wrote: So, comments, brickbats, acclaim, whatever. Throw it at me. Well I don't think that this system as described would be of any use to me. I want to maintain a

Re: GNU polyxmass: brand new lintian-linda-clean packages

Hi, Filippo! So, it is GNU polyxmass, now? You are an official GNU project and all. Congratulations. (We'll continue the rest of the discussion by private mail, shall we?) On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 10:19:45AM +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote: Apart from those lintian W/E messages, the packages are

Re: Multi-person sponsorship

Matthew Palmer wrote: package I sponsor. I want to know if they are not able to send me a package that will build properly. I want to work with them and be Since you only get packages for sponsorship which have built in a clean sid chroot out of my system, you can be fairly sure of that.

Re: RFS: irssi-scripts -- useful collection of scripts for irssi

Hello Frank! On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 12:39:04PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: Florian Ernst [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Checking on Woody won't be necessary, since this package will never make it to Woody. Or did I misunderstand you here? Remember backports. Nobody knows when sarge will be

未承諾広告※

＜事業者＞＜送信者＞ 有限会社　富士友の会　　ＨＰ担当　石田 〒640-0413 和歌山県貴志川局内神戸862-7 TEL:0736（64）9552 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 　 ◆『YY-NET』会員制ご案内◆ 素敵な人生のパートナーをみつけるお手伝いをいたします。 ☆こちらは交際・結婚・再婚を望まれる方の会です。 　(入会資格は、23歳以上で日本在住の方です。） ☆新規ご入会された方にはあなたのご希望に合った方を1名無料で紹介 　します！（写真付プロフィールを1名郵便で紹介します。）

Re: Multi-person sponsorship

On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 01:05:08PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: Matthew Palmer wrote: package I sponsor. I want to know if they are not able to send me a package that will build properly. I want to work with them and be Since you only get packages for sponsorship which have built in a clean

Re: Multi-person sponsorship

Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 01:05:08PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: Matthew Palmer wrote: package I sponsor. I want to know if they are not able to send me a package that will build properly. I want to work with them and be Since you only get