On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:37:40 -0700, Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28
22:21:14 +1000]:
I don't think you should create a debian package for small script,
IMO.
Agree. Even if I
Some preliminary comments as I have not yet had time to look at the
package proper:
- the diff.gz is pretty much empty, it just patches the
debian/changelog. I have not been able to verify if the upstream
tarballs contain debian/* as the files do not seem to be on the sf.net
mirrors yet. From the
- the diff.gz is pretty much empty, it just patches the
debian/changelog. I have not been able to verify if the upstream
tarballs contain debian/* as the files do not seem to be on the sf.net
mirrors yet.
they do.
From the CVS logs you seem to be part of the development
team, so it
On Thursday 01 July 2004 08:55, Jeremy Lainé wrote:
Some preliminary comments as I have not yet had time to look at the
package proper:
- the diff.gz is pretty much empty, it just patches the
debian/changelog. I have not been able to verify if the upstream
tarballs contain debian/* as the
no problem, I'm the release tech anyway.
I'm on it.
done.
revision 2 is on its way on kalyxo, and as ever it's on
http://amaretto.inria.fr:8080/~mc/akregator/
and as ever lintian, linda and pdebuild clean.
any remark ?
--
Pierre Habouzit
http://www.madism.org/
signature.asc
Description:
On Thursday, July 01, 2004 8:50 AM, Peter Rockai (mornfall)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 01 July 2004 08:55, Jeremy Lainé wrote:
[...]
- the package versions look dodgy, as there are 2 dashes
(1.0-beta4-1). Furthermore you are going to run into problems when
the final 1.0 version
Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The final version will be labelled 1.0.0-1 of course.
Erm, no, please don't. 1.0.0 is an NMU version number.
I thougth x-1.1 would be a NMU version number?
Christoph
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 10:15:07PM -0300, Lucas Wall wrote:
That would be the [1]key signing coordination page.
K.
[1] http://nm.debian.org/gpg.php
Okies! Thanks a lot!
Cheers,
Zakame
--
|=-ZAK B. ELEP (Registered Linux User
Name: knoda
Licence: GPL
Short description: knoda is a database frontend for KDE. It is based on
hk_classes
Long description: http://www.knoda.org/
Where can the package be obtained: by emailing me.
more info:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=160321
signature.asc
Description:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 10:15:07PM -0300, Lucas Wall wrote:
That would be the [1]key signing coordination page.
K.
[1] http://nm.debian.org/gpg.php
According to the Applicant's Checklist[1]:
# The applicant's identity needs to be verified.
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 11:16:23AM +0200, Christoph Wegscheider wrote:
Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The final version will be labelled 1.0.0-1 of course.
Erm, no, please don't. 1.0.0 is an NMU version number.
I thougth x-1.1 would be a NMU version number?
Indeed, in fact,
On Thursday, July 01, 2004 10:16 AM, Christoph Wegscheider
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The final version will be labelled 1.0.0-1 of course.
Erm, no, please don't. 1.0.0 is an NMU version number.
I thougth x-1.1 would be a NMU version number?
You're
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 11:32:32AM +0200, Stan Pinte wrote:
Name: knoda
Licence: GPL
Short description: knoda is a database frontend for KDE. It is based on
hk_classes
Long description: http://www.knoda.org/
Where can the package be obtained: by emailing me.
Please post to the list the location
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 04:55:42AM +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
I'm also searching a sponsor to upload UrlGfe (http://urlget.sf.net)
packages from mentors.debian.org to debian unstable. UrlGfe is a
graphical download manager, that's using GTK+ for its UI and the great
libcurl for file downloading.
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 01:20:23AM +0200, Pierre HABOUZIT wrote:
Hello!
I'm looking for sponsor for the $SUBJ (and I would like to start my NM
application too). The will be available soon at :
deb http://www.kalyxo.org/debian unstable main
You didn't put the following lines in
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 12:57:22AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:37:40 -0700, Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28
22:21:14 +1000]:
I don't think you should
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 07:42:34PM -0600, Benjamin Cutler wrote:
Package name: cc65
Version : 2.10.1
Upstream Author : Ullrich von Bassewitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL : http://www.cc65.org/
License : zlib-alike
Description : Cross development
You didn't put the following lines in debian/copyright (see [0] and
[1]):
[...]
grep -ri copyright akregator-1.0_beta4fixed/akregator/src/
very good point.
done
Please consider to put the URL of the home page of the package in the
description in debian/control. See [2] and [3].
done too
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 11:32:32AM +0200, Stan Pinte wrote:
Name: knoda
Licence: GPL
Short description: knoda is a database frontend for KDE. It is based on
hk_classes
This description sucks. Don't start with the package name, it's too long,
and what is hk_classes (and why should I, as a
* Geert Stappers [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-01 13:58:04 +0200]:
That is a solid RFS!
I still didn't made time to check it out
and will not able the next few days.
Try to find a sponsor at Debian mailinglist that have
interrest in other architectures and/or embedded application.
This
* Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-01 00:57:22 -0500]:
Maybe kernel-package?
Exactly. That's the best place for it IMHO.
Umm , I missed the beginnihg of this thread. What does
ketchup do?
Fetch the latest kernel version based on the user's choice (stable,
-pre, -mm),
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 07:42:34PM -0600, Benjamin Cutler wrote:
[snip]
I was digging around trying to find a useful emulation-related utilities
after my failed attempt at packaging Gens due to legal issues[0], and
somebody pointed me to this little gem. At first it appeared that it was
Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
Umm , I missed the beginnihg of this thread. What does
ketchup do?
Fetch the latest kernel version based on the user's choice (stable,
-pre, -mm), compiles and install it as far as I remember correctly.
Actually, it only fetches the required
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
|
| I'll have a look at this package this weekend, and if everything is ok,
| I'll sponsor you. I've got 16 years of experience with 6510-assembly,
| which should be enough... Granted, I haven't done any
| 65816-programming.
|
|
| Regards: David
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 02:46:10PM -0600, Benjamin Cutler wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
|
| I'll have a look at this package this weekend, and if everything is ok,
| I'll sponsor you. I've got 16 years of experience with 6510-assembly,
| which should be enough...
Hi Michael (and d-mentors),
All issues are fixed and updated packages are available:
deb http://www.teco.edu/~biebl/debian/ unstable main
I am going to sponsor.
I've uploaded to anonymous-ftp-master.
--
ARAKI Yasuhiro
A Debian Official Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
On Monday 28 June 2004 01:11 pm, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 07:05:54PM +0200, Frederik Dannemare wrote:
Regarding the debian/copyright: Should I leave the line 'This package
was debianized by ...' untouched? Or should this line be updated to
reflect new
Some preliminary comments as I have not yet had time to look at the
package proper:
- the diff.gz is pretty much empty, it just patches the
debian/changelog. I have not been able to verify if the upstream
tarballs contain debian/* as the files do not seem to be on the sf.net
mirrors yet. From the
- the diff.gz is pretty much empty, it just patches the
debian/changelog. I have not been able to verify if the upstream
tarballs contain debian/* as the files do not seem to be on the sf.net
mirrors yet.
they do.
From the CVS logs you seem to be part of the development
team, so it
On Thursday 01 July 2004 08:55, Jeremy Lain wrote:
Some preliminary comments as I have not yet had time to look at the
package proper:
- the diff.gz is pretty much empty, it just patches the
debian/changelog. I have not been able to verify if the upstream
tarballs contain debian/* as the
no problem, I'm the release tech anyway.
I'm on it.
done.
revision 2 is on its way on kalyxo, and as ever it's on
http://amaretto.inria.fr:8080/~mc/akregator/
and as ever lintian, linda and pdebuild clean.
any remark ?
--
Pierre Habouzit
http://www.madism.org/
signature.asc
Description:
On Thursday, July 01, 2004 8:50 AM, Peter Rockai (mornfall)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 01 July 2004 08:55, Jeremy Lain wrote:
[...]
- the package versions look dodgy, as there are 2 dashes
(1.0-beta4-1). Furthermore you are going to run into problems when
the final 1.0 version comes
Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The final version will be labelled 1.0.0-1 of course.
Erm, no, please don't. 1.0.0 is an NMU version number.
I thougth x-1.1 would be a NMU version number?
Christoph
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 10:15:07PM -0300, Lucas Wall wrote:
That would be the [1]key signing coordination page.
K.
[1] http://nm.debian.org/gpg.php
Okies! Thanks a lot!
Cheers,
Zakame
--
|=-ZAK B. ELEP (Registered Linux User
Name: knoda
Licence: GPL
Short description: knoda is a database frontend for KDE. It is based on
hk_classes
Long description: http://www.knoda.org/
Where can the package be obtained: by emailing me.
more info:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=160321
signature.asc
Description:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 10:15:07PM -0300, Lucas Wall wrote:
That would be the [1]key signing coordination page.
K.
[1] http://nm.debian.org/gpg.php
According to the Applicant's Checklist[1]:
# The applicant's identity needs to be verified.
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 11:16:23AM +0200, Christoph Wegscheider wrote:
Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The final version will be labelled 1.0.0-1 of course.
Erm, no, please don't. 1.0.0 is an NMU version number.
I thougth x-1.1 would be a NMU version number?
Indeed, in fact,
On Thursday, July 01, 2004 10:16 AM, Christoph Wegscheider
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam D. Barratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The final version will be labelled 1.0.0-1 of course.
Erm, no, please don't. 1.0.0 is an NMU version number.
I thougth x-1.1 would be a NMU version number?
You're
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 11:32:32AM +0200, Stan Pinte wrote:
Name: knoda
Licence: GPL
Short description: knoda is a database frontend for KDE. It is based on
hk_classes
Long description: http://www.knoda.org/
Where can the package be obtained: by emailing me.
Please post to the list the location
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 04:55:42AM +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
I'm also searching a sponsor to upload UrlGfe (http://urlget.sf.net)
packages from mentors.debian.org to debian unstable. UrlGfe is a
graphical download manager, that's using GTK+ for its UI and the great
libcurl for file downloading.
Hallo Lucas,
* Lucas Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-01 12:05]:
[...]
i dont no the url exactly, but search the debian.org website, there is a
site, where you can search for a dd in your environment.
try to search google for debian key signing program.
that would be the [1]key signing
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 01:20:23AM +0200, Pierre HABOUZIT wrote:
Hello!
I'm looking for sponsor for the $SUBJ (and I would like to start my NM
application too). The will be available soon at :
deb http://www.kalyxo.org/debian unstable main
You didn't put the following lines in
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 12:57:22AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:37:40 -0700, Brian Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Anibal Monsalve Salazar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-28
22:21:14 +1000]:
I don't think you should
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 07:42:34PM -0600, Benjamin Cutler wrote:
Package name: cc65
Version : 2.10.1
Upstream Author : Ullrich von Bassewitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL : http://www.cc65.org/
License : zlib-alike
Description : Cross development
You didn't put the following lines in debian/copyright (see [0] and
[1]):
[...]
grep -ri copyright akregator-1.0_beta4fixed/akregator/src/
very good point.
done
Please consider to put the URL of the home page of the package in the
description in debian/control. See [2] and [3].
done too
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 11:32:32AM +0200, Stan Pinte wrote:
Name: knoda
Licence: GPL
Short description: knoda is a database frontend for KDE. It is based on
hk_classes
This description sucks. Don't start with the package name, it's too long,
and what is hk_classes (and why should I, as a
* Geert Stappers [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-01 13:58:04 +0200]:
That is a solid RFS!
I still didn't made time to check it out
and will not able the next few days.
Try to find a sponsor at Debian mailinglist that have
interrest in other architectures and/or embedded application.
This
* Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-01 00:57:22 -0500]:
Maybe kernel-package?
Exactly. That's the best place for it IMHO.
Umm , I missed the beginnihg of this thread. What does
ketchup do?
Fetch the latest kernel version based on the user's choice (stable,
-pre, -mm),
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 07:42:34PM -0600, Benjamin Cutler wrote:
[snip]
I was digging around trying to find a useful emulation-related utilities
after my failed attempt at packaging Gens due to legal issues[0], and
somebody pointed me to this little gem. At first it appeared that it was
Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
Umm , I missed the beginnihg of this thread. What does
ketchup do?
Fetch the latest kernel version based on the user's choice (stable,
-pre, -mm), compiles and install it as far as I remember correctly.
Actually, it only fetches the required patches,
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 05:32:08PM +, Jack Wasey wrote:
Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
Umm , I missed the beginnihg of this thread. What does
ketchup do?
Fetch the latest kernel version based on the user's choice (stable,
-pre, -mm), compiles and install it as far as I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
|
| I'll have a look at this package this weekend, and if everything is ok,
| I'll sponsor you. I've got 16 years of experience with 6510-assembly,
| which should be enough... Granted, I haven't done any
| 65816-programming.
|
|
| Regards: David
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 02:46:10PM -0600, Benjamin Cutler wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
|
| I'll have a look at this package this weekend, and if everything is ok,
| I'll sponsor you. I've got 16 years of experience with 6510-assembly,
| which should be enough...
Hi Michael (and d-mentors),
All issues are fixed and updated packages are available:
deb http://www.teco.edu/~biebl/debian/ unstable main
I am going to sponsor.
I've uploaded to anonymous-ftp-master.
--
ARAKI Yasuhiro
A Debian Official Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
I sent this message to the sasl2-bin package maintainer, but I suspect
he's really busy. I haven't received a response.
I'm not sure whether to open a bug, because I don't understand the
problem. I can't reproduce the problem with the sasl2-bin binary
package, compiling the source package on
55 matches
Mail list logo
