On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 03:25:06PM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 11:57:38AM -0700, William Ballard wrote:
>
> > Notice libfam0c102 isn't coming in with a version dependency. Is there
> > to make dh_shlibdeps add that in?
>
> No. Why do you believe that you need to?
I
Pierre HABOUZIT wrote:
Indeed, in fact, where there will be a 1.1betax i'll use the
1.99-1+betax version number, that is really clear, and shorter than a
0.99-1+1.0-beta4
but in fact, the non-official debian repository where i dput my packages
atm had a q&dirty package named 1.0-beta1 and I had
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 09:47:26PM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> dh_shlibdeps (via dpkg-shlibdeps) uses information that the library
> maintainer provided (the shlibs file) to determine the appropriate
> dependency. This mechanism is documented in the policy manual.
Good answer. Got it. (What
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 08:48:39PM -0700, William Ballard wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 03:25:06PM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 11:57:38AM -0700, William Ballard wrote:
> >
> > > Notice libfam0c102 isn't coming in with a version dependency. Is there
> > > to make
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 03:25:06PM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 11:57:38AM -0700, William Ballard wrote:
>
> > Notice libfam0c102 isn't coming in with a version dependency. Is there
> > to make dh_shlibdeps add that in?
>
> No. Why do you believe that you need to?
I
Pierre HABOUZIT wrote:
Indeed, in fact, where there will be a 1.1betax i'll use the
1.99-1+betax version number, that is really clear, and shorter than a
0.99-1+1.0-beta4
but in fact, the non-official debian repository where i dput my packages
atm had a q&dirty package named 1.0-beta1 and I had to
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 09:14:52PM +0200, Mark Wilson wrote:
>Greetings,
>
>i am still looking a sponsor for package "yaffa".
>
>Version 0.11 is a new upstream release.
>
><><>Package name : yaffa
>
><><><>Version: 0.10-1
>Upstream Authors : Anton Persson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Dis(f6acc76a63c)con(f44bc3b)tinue
Gd8x1.Zg5eP.QsMk.12SnAj0xzMpI/XCNBZ0MTmiq/bv/NY0
If I repent of anything, it is very likely to be my good behavior.,You can often measure a person by the size of his dream.,For of those to whom much is given, much is required.,There will come a time when you be
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 09:14:52PM +0200, Mark Wilson wrote:
>Greetings,
>
>i am still looking a sponsor for package "yaffa".
>
>Version 0.11 is a new upstream release.
>
><><>Package name : yaffa
>
><><><>Version: 0.10-1
>Upstream Authors : Anton Persson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 11:57:38AM -0700, William Ballard wrote:
> Notice libfam0c102 isn't coming in with a version dependency. Is there
> to make dh_shlibdeps add that in?
No. Why do you believe that you need to?
--
- mdz
LowCost version of popular S-ex Pill is just 2.50 per dosage.
More and more men are ordering from offshore pharmacies for convenience.
Pay for your order by credit card online.
Pearlie Hamiton
http://rd.yahoo.com/Jtiehh/*http://Nofcnjsta.affordableonlinegenerics.com
If you have no interes
Dis(f6acc76a63c)con(f44bc3b)tinue
Gd8x1.Zg5eP.QsMk.12SnAj0xzMpI/XCNBZ0MTmiq/bv/NY0
If I repent of anything, it is very likely to be my good behavior.,You can often measure a person by the size of his dream.,For of those to whom much is given, much is required.,There will come a time when you be
On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 11:57:38AM -0700, William Ballard wrote:
> Notice libfam0c102 isn't coming in with a version dependency. Is there
> to make dh_shlibdeps add that in?
No. Why do you believe that you need to?
--
- mdz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
LowCost version of popular S-ex Pill is just 2.50 per dosage.
More and more men are ordering from offshore pharmacies for convenience.
Pay for your order by credit card online.
Pearlie Hamiton
http://rd.yahoo.com/Jtiehh/*http://Nofcnjsta.affordableonlinegenerics.com
If you have no interes
Fam isn't configurable via pkg-config, but I put it in configure.ac
via a call to AC_CHECK_LIB(fam,main) [1].
In debian/rules I call dh_shlibdeps but not dh_makeshlibs, and I end up
with these substvars:
shlibs:Depends=libart-2.0-2 (>= 2.3.16), libatk1.0-0 (>= 1.6.0), libc6
(>= 2.3.2.ds1-4), l
On Jul 1, 2004, at 11:50 PM, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2004-07-02 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I've tried for many months to get saslauthd working with PAM - I
happen to use the pam_krb5 module. Now it's working when I build it
myself - but I don't know why. I have a pretty stock installation
Fam isn't configurable via pkg-config, but I put it in configure.ac
via a call to AC_CHECK_LIB(fam,main) [1].
In debian/rules I call dh_shlibdeps but not dh_makeshlibs, and I end up
with these substvars:
shlibs:Depends=libart-2.0-2 (>= 2.3.16), libatk1.0-0 (>= 1.6.0), libc6
(>= 2.3.2.ds1-4), l
On Jul 1, 2004, at 11:50 PM, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2004-07-02 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I've tried for many months to get saslauthd working with PAM - I
happen to use the pam_krb5 module. Now it's working when I build it
myself - but I don't know why. I have a pretty stock installation of
> do you have any other advice/remark ?
well, if nobody has anything to add, is there someone interested in
beeing my sponsor for akregator ?
--
Pierre Habouzit
http://www.madism.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Peter Rockai (mornfall) wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'm looking for sponsor for the $SUBJ, until i finish my NM application.
> The package is available at:
> deb http://www.kalyxo.org/debian unstable main
>
> Here's the whereabouts of the package:
> ITP bug: 236696 (owned by Alejandro Exojo, but i have
> do you have any other advice/remark ?
well, if nobody has anything to add, is there someone interested in
beeing my sponsor for akregator ?
--
Pierre Habouzit
http://www.madism.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Peter Rockai (mornfall) wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'm looking for sponsor for the $SUBJ, until i finish my NM application.
> The package is available at:
> deb http://www.kalyxo.org/debian unstable main
>
> Here's the whereabouts of the package:
> ITP bug: 236696 (owned by Alejandro Exojo, but i have
Le jeu 01/07/2004 à 13:41, Matthew Palmer a écrit :
> On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 11:32:32AM +0200, Stan Pinte wrote:
> > Name: knoda
> > Licence: GPL
> > Short description: knoda is a database frontend for KDE. It is based on
> > hk_classes
>
> This description sucks. Don't start with the package na
On 2004-07-02 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
> >I've tried for many months to get saslauthd working with PAM - I
> >happen to use the pam_krb5 module. Now it's working when I build it
> >myself - but I don't know why. I have a pretty stock installation of
> >unstable on a Pentium 75 and a Celero
Le jeu 01/07/2004 à 13:41, Matthew Palmer a écrit :
> On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 11:32:32AM +0200, Stan Pinte wrote:
> > Name: knoda
> > Licence: GPL
> > Short description: knoda is a database frontend for KDE. It is based on
> > hk_classes
>
> This description sucks. Don't start with the package na
On 2004-07-02 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
> >I've tried for many months to get saslauthd working with PAM - I
> >happen to use the pam_krb5 module. Now it's working when I build it
> >myself - but I don't know why. I have a pretty stock installation of
> >unstable on a Pentium 75 and a Celero
26 matches
Mail list logo
