В сообщении от Вск, 2004-07-04 at 12:13 +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar
писал:
When I run pbuilder on the debian source package of gwget, it couldn't
fetch from my local debian mirror:
libgnome2-common_2.6.1-6_all.deb
libgnome2-0_2.6.1-6_i386.deb
libgnome2-dev_2.6.1-6_i386.deb
May be you
On 2004-07-04 Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of my packages require a device to be crated for functioning. It is
ok if the user has a normal /dev/, but how should I handle the udev
case? I can detect it, no problem; still I am looking forward for
documentation how
On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 03:48:07AM +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
Debian's gwget packages is outdated, so I packaged the new upstream
version from scratch with new name, manpage and other cool features. I
also provided a transitional packages. I already mailed Debian's gwget
maintainer, but I
On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 10:16:25AM +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
?? ?? ??, 2004-07-04 at 12:13 +1000, Anibal Monsalve
Salazar
??:
When I run pbuilder on the debian source package of gwget, it couldn't
fetch from my local debian mirror:
В сообщении от Вск, 2004-07-04 at 09:04 +0200, Geert Stappers писал:
So there is already a Debian package of gwget
and you felt the itch to update it.
My first thought was looks like a hi-jack
hi-jack?
http://packages.debian.org/gwget says Can't find that package
Debian's package name is
Please don't include that svn+perms script in any package. It needs
some more work before I'm ready to support it.
For what it's worth, Subversion 1.1.0 will support symlinks.
--
Ben Reser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ben.reser.org
Conscience is the inner voice which warns us somebody may be
On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 09:04:09AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 03:48:07AM +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
Debian's gwget packages is outdated, so I packaged the new upstream
version from scratch with new name, manpage and other cool features. I
also provided a transitional
В сообщении от Вск, 2004-07-04 at 17:57 +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar
писал:
/bin/sh: line 1: /usr/bin/docbook-to-man: No such file or directory
Fixed (added docbook-to-man to Build-Depends)
You are trying to hijack gwget2 and replace it with gwget. This is not
the way to do it
On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 03:48:07AM +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
Debian's gwget packages is outdated, so I packaged the new upstream
version from scratch with new name, manpage and other cool features. I
also provided a transitional packages. I already mailed Debian's gwget
maintainer, but I want
* Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-04 08:39:59 +0200]:
On 2004-07-04 Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of my packages require a device to be crated for functioning. It is
ok if the user has a normal /dev/, but how should I handle the udev
case? I can detect
On 2004-07-04 Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-04 08:39:59 +0200]:
On 2004-07-04 Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of my packages require a device to be crated for functioning. It is
ok if the user has a
* Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-04 12:12:27 +0200]:
Thanks Andreas. But how can I specify major and minor numbers? As I
know and seems MAKEDEV supports only a list of devices it knows. As my
device entry would be specific, I get:
/sbin/MAKEDEV: don't know how to make device
On Friday 02 July 2004 09:20, Stan Pinte wrote:
someone send me a mail, saying that these packages are already
maintained since 1.5 years...
(http://mentors.debian.net/debian/dists/unstable/main/binary-i386/kno
da/)
I'll have a look, and contact their maintainer first.
I wanted to sponsor
How to properly debianize and maintain CVS versions of software? There's
no tarballs and no version in directory name.
--
Dan Korostelev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Dan Korostelev wrote:
How to properly debianize and maintain CVS versions of software? There's
no tarballs and no version in directory name.
Make a orig.tar.gz out of the CVS co.
and name it something like previous released version+cvsYYMMDD
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René
On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 05:48:05PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
Dan Korostelev wrote:
How to properly debianize and maintain CVS versions of software? There's
no tarballs and no version in directory name.
Make a orig.tar.gz out of the CVS co.
Please use cvs export, not cvs co.
I've had a look at it. Hm, it's not exactly what I hoped for (at least
not at it's present stage of development), and since I think I'm not
going to use it, I also won't sponsor it.
I'm sorry to hear that. I agree it is still in quite an early stage of
development, but AFAIK it is the only
James Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've had a look at it. Hm, it's not exactly what I hoped for (at least
not at it's present stage of development), and since I think I'm not
going to use it, I also won't sponsor it.
I'm sorry to hear that. I agree it is still in quite an early stage of
On 2004-07-04 Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of my packages require a device to be crated for functioning. It is
ok if the user has a normal /dev/, but how should I handle the udev
case? I can detect it, no problem; still I am looking forward for
documentation how
On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 03:48:07AM +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
Debian's gwget packages is outdated, so I packaged the new upstream
version from scratch with new name, manpage and other cool features. I
also provided a transitional packages. I already mailed Debian's gwget
maintainer, but I
On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 10:16:25AM +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
?? ?? ??, 2004-07-04 at 12:13 +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar
??:
When I run pbuilder on the debian source package of gwget, it couldn't
fetch from my local debian mirror:
, 2004-07-04 at 09:04 +0200, Geert Stappers
:
So there is already a Debian package of gwget
and you felt the itch to update it.
My first thought was looks like a hi-jack
hi-jack?
http://packages.debian.org/gwget says Can't find that package
Debian's package name is gwget2. It's okay for
Please don't include that svn+perms script in any package. It needs
some more work before I'm ready to support it.
For what it's worth, Subversion 1.1.0 will support symlinks.
--
Ben Reser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ben.reser.org
Conscience is the inner voice which warns us somebody may be
On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 09:04:09AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 03:48:07AM +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
Debian's gwget packages is outdated, so I packaged the new upstream
version from scratch with new name, manpage and other cool features. I
also provided a transitional
, 2004-07-04 at 17:57 +1000, Anibal Monsalve Salazar
:
/bin/sh: line 1: /usr/bin/docbook-to-man: No such file or directory
Fixed (added docbook-to-man to Build-Depends)
You are trying to hijack gwget2 and replace it with gwget. This is not
the way to do it appropriately.
I emailed gwget2's
On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 03:48:07AM +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
Debian's gwget packages is outdated, so I packaged the new upstream
version from scratch with new name, manpage and other cool features. I
also provided a transitional packages. I already mailed Debian's gwget
maintainer, but I want
* Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-04 08:39:59 +0200]:
On 2004-07-04 Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of my packages require a device to be crated for functioning. It is
ok if the user has a normal /dev/, but how should I handle the udev
case? I can detect
On 2004-07-04 Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-04 08:39:59 +0200]:
On 2004-07-04 Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of my packages require a device to be crated for functioning. It is
ok if the user has a
* Andreas Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-04 12:12:27 +0200]:
Thanks Andreas. But how can I specify major and minor numbers? As I
know and seems MAKEDEV supports only a list of devices it knows. As my
device entry would be specific, I get:
/sbin/MAKEDEV: don't know how to make device
On Friday 02 July 2004 09:20, Stan Pinte wrote:
someone send me a mail, saying that these packages are already
maintained since 1.5 years...
(http://mentors.debian.net/debian/dists/unstable/main/binary-i386/kno
da/)
I'll have a look, and contact their maintainer first.
I wanted to sponsor
On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 07:02:08PM +0400, Dan Korostelev wrote:
How to properly debianize and maintain CVS versions of software? There's
no tarballs
Make one yourself from whatever you're using as upstream source. For
instance, if upstream has a 'make dist' target or similar, you could run
that
Hi,
Dan Korostelev wrote:
How to properly debianize and maintain CVS versions of software? There's
no tarballs and no version in directory name.
Make a orig.tar.gz out of the CVS co.
and name it something like previous released version+cvsYYMMDD
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René
On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 05:48:05PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Hi,
Dan Korostelev wrote:
How to properly debianize and maintain CVS versions of software? There's
no tarballs and no version in directory name.
Make a orig.tar.gz out of the CVS co.
Please use cvs export, not cvs co.
I've had a look at it. Hm, it's not exactly what I hoped for (at least
not at it's present stage of development), and since I think I'm not
going to use it, I also won't sponsor it.
I'm sorry to hear that. I agree it is still in quite an early stage of
development, but AFAIK it is the only
James Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've had a look at it. Hm, it's not exactly what I hoped for (at least
not at it's present stage of development), and since I think I'm not
going to use it, I also won't sponsor it.
I'm sorry to hear that. I agree it is still in quite an early stage of
35 matches
Mail list logo
