Thanks, Andreas, for pointing out the copyright liability in gtklp-0.9, and
for Tobias for fixing it up :)
So, here's the brand-new gtklp-1.0pre1 signed changes file:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 22:14:31 +0800
Source: gtklp
Binary: gtklp
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 11:15:05PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 10:23:23PM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
Hi,
I can not reach my sponsor for a while now, who is Martin F. Krafft.
Can someone help me out instead, and look up gradm2 package for me? It
was
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 12:09:10PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 03:35:14AM -0400, Randall Donald wrote:
hi,
Hello ftpmaster,
(Hello ftpmasters, ;-)
Hello debian-mentors,
E: conglomerate: no-copyright-file
W: conglomerate: non-standard-dir-perm usr/ 0775 !=
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 05:10:21PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 12:09:10PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
I'm surprised that your lintian procedures more information then mine.
According to packages.qa.debian.org is the most recent version 1.23.2,
I use that version
Hello,
I have already built limewire 4.0.6 from the previous verision's
makefile and would like to maintain. I am looking for a sponsor as I am
new to development.
Thanks,
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 17 August 2004 04:09, Geert Stappers wrote:
I'm surprised that your lintian procedures more information then
mine. According to packages.qa.debian.org is the most recent version
1.23.2, I use that version also. The linda program does report also
the missing manpage, but not the
On Sun, 2004-08-29 at 13:29, james wrote:
Hello,
I have already built limewire 4.0.6 from the previous verision's
makefile and would like to maintain. I am looking for a sponsor as I am
new to development.
It generally helps to link to the packages you've created so that
potential sponsors
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 11:44:57AM -0600, Wesley J Landaker wrote:
On Tuesday 17 August 2004 04:09, Geert Stappers wrote:
I'm surprised that your lintian procedures more information then
mine. According to packages.qa.debian.org is the most recent version
1.23.2, I use that version also.
On Sunday 29 August 2004 11:50, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 11:44:57AM -0600, Wesley J Landaker wrote:
I generally use
$ lintian *.{deb,dsc,changes}
Running lintian on a .changes file will simply run in on those files
named in it, it isn't needed to also
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 12:08:54PM -0600, Wesley J Landaker wrote:
On Sunday 29 August 2004 11:50, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 11:44:57AM -0600, Wesley J Landaker wrote:
I generally use
$ lintian *.{deb,dsc,changes}
Running lintian on a .changes file will
On Sunday 29 August 2004 12:11, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
You're right; thanks for the clairification. In that case, it might
make sense to change my habit to lintian *.changes and save a few
keystrokes. =)
Which is exactly what debuild by default does for you. In addition,
it will
On Fri, 27, Aug, 2004 at 06:49:47AM -0600, Wesley J Landaker spoke thus..
Sounds good; posts the links to your packages when you feel that they're
ready and I'll take a look at them. Unfortunately, like a quantum
particle, I'll be popping in and out of existance this week, but I
should have
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 07:26:35PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 05:10:21PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
snip what=warnings found by others, but by me/
According the manual page of lintian is there a check for huge /usr/share.
Conglomerate 0.7.14-1[1] is about
Diverting to lintain-maint, where this is more appropriate...
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 10:26:13PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 07:26:35PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 05:10:21PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
snip what=warnings found by
On Sunday 29 August 2004 14:37, Mark Hymers wrote:
I think the package is ready for upload now. I've made a few changes
since the last version you saw.
Also, our local server at work has died (and I haven't had a chance
to look at it yet as it's the weekend) so I've uploaded the source
On Sun, 2004-08-29 at 20:20, Dirk Prösdorf wrote:
Hello,
I'm looking for a sponsor for the unrar-nonfree.
s/unrar/unace/
The Debian packages can
you find on http://www.proesdorf.de/uploads/unace-nonfree/.
Some infos about this package. There is a free version of unace in
Debian but
Thanks, Andreas, for pointing out the copyright liability in gtklp-0.9, and
for Tobias for fixing it up :)
So, here's the brand-new gtklp-1.0pre1 signed changes file:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 22:14:31 +0800
Source: gtklp
Binary: gtklp
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 11:15:05PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 10:23:23PM +0200, Laszlo 'GCS' Boszormenyi wrote:
Hi,
I can not reach my sponsor for a while now, who is Martin F. Krafft.
Can someone help me out instead, and look up gradm2 package for me? It
was
On 2004-08-29 Zak B. Elep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gtklp (1.0pre1-1) unstable; urgency=low
[...]
I would not use this version number. You'd be forced to either use a
epoch for the real 1.0 or 1.0rel
$ dpkg --compare-versions 0.9u-1 '' '1.0pre1-1' || echo not ok
$ dpkg --compare-versions 1.0-1
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 12:09:10PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 03:35:14AM -0400, Randall Donald wrote:
hi,
Hello ftpmaster,
(Hello ftpmasters, ;-)
Hello debian-mentors,
E: conglomerate: no-copyright-file
W: conglomerate: non-standard-dir-perm usr/ 0775 !=
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 05:10:21PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 12:09:10PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
I'm surprised that your lintian procedures more information then mine.
According to packages.qa.debian.org is the most recent version 1.23.2,
I use that version
Hello,
I have already built limewire 4.0.6 from the previous verision's
makefile and would like to maintain. I am looking for a sponsor as I am
new to development.
Thanks,
James
On Tuesday 17 August 2004 04:09, Geert Stappers wrote:
I'm surprised that your lintian procedures more information then
mine. According to packages.qa.debian.org is the most recent version
1.23.2, I use that version also. The linda program does report also
the missing manpage, but not the
On Sun, 2004-08-29 at 13:29, james wrote:
Hello,
I have already built limewire 4.0.6 from the previous verision's
makefile and would like to maintain. I am looking for a sponsor as I am
new to development.
It generally helps to link to the packages you've created so that
potential sponsors
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 11:44:57AM -0600, Wesley J Landaker wrote:
On Tuesday 17 August 2004 04:09, Geert Stappers wrote:
I'm surprised that your lintian procedures more information then
mine. According to packages.qa.debian.org is the most recent version
1.23.2, I use that version also.
On Sunday 29 August 2004 11:50, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 11:44:57AM -0600, Wesley J Landaker wrote:
I generally use
$ lintian *.{deb,dsc,changes}
Running lintian on a .changes file will simply run in on those files
named in it, it isn't needed to also
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 12:08:54PM -0600, Wesley J Landaker wrote:
On Sunday 29 August 2004 11:50, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 11:44:57AM -0600, Wesley J Landaker wrote:
I generally use
$ lintian *.{deb,dsc,changes}
Running lintian on a .changes file will
On Sunday 29 August 2004 12:11, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
You're right; thanks for the clairification. In that case, it might
make sense to change my habit to lintian *.changes and save a few
keystrokes. =)
Which is exactly what debuild by default does for you. In addition,
it will
On Fri, 27, Aug, 2004 at 06:49:47AM -0600, Wesley J Landaker spoke thus..
Sounds good; posts the links to your packages when you feel that they're
ready and I'll take a look at them. Unfortunately, like a quantum
particle, I'll be popping in and out of existance this week, but I
should have
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 07:26:35PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 05:10:21PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
snip what=warnings found by others, but by me/
According the manual page of lintian is there a check for huge /usr/share.
Conglomerate 0.7.14-1[1] is about
Diverting to lintain-maint, where this is more appropriate...
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 10:26:13PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 07:26:35PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 05:10:21PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
snip what=warnings found by
On Sunday 29 August 2004 14:37, Mark Hymers wrote:
I think the package is ready for upload now. I've made a few changes
since the last version you saw.
Also, our local server at work has died (and I haven't had a chance
to look at it yet as it's the weekend) so I've uploaded the source
Hello,
I'm looking for a sponsor for the unrar-nonfree. The Debian packages can
you find on http://www.proesdorf.de/uploads/unace-nonfree/.
Some infos about this package. There is a free version of unace in
Debian but this version 1.2b don't support newer ACE archives (the same
like unrar and
On Sun, 2004-08-29 at 20:20, Dirk Prösdorf wrote:
Hello,
I'm looking for a sponsor for the unrar-nonfree.
s/unrar/unace/
The Debian packages can
you find on http://www.proesdorf.de/uploads/unace-nonfree/.
Some infos about this package. There is a free version of unace in
Debian but
34 matches
Mail list logo
