I'm the maintainer of two packages, say A and B. B build depends on A, i
uploaded a bugged version of A, which inhibit building of B. Now I've
fixed the problem, but B needs to be rebuilt on all architectures.
Is there a single person/email address I can ask for rebuilding package
B on all archs?
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 08:51:07AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I'm the maintainer of two packages, say A and B. B build depends on A, i
uploaded a bugged version of A, which inhibit building of B. Now I've
fixed the problem, but B needs to be rebuilt on all architectures.
Is there a
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 08:51:07AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I can also reupload a new version of B, but it would be inappropriate
since nothing changed in that package.
I think it's the preferred method, though. Certainly I've had bugs filed on
my packages to upload a new version so
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 06:12:27PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
I think it's the preferred method, though. Certainly I've had bugs filed on
my packages to upload a new version so that the package gets rebuilt against
a new ABI.
Beware that my package B has not been built against the wrong
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 01:19:24AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 06:12:27PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 08:51:07AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I can also reupload a new version of B, but it would be inappropriate
since nothing changed
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 07:56:37PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
The issue is that providing a package for a webapp that only integrates
with certain webserver packages in Debian splits the userbase between
those who have a reason to want to use your package, and those who have
to do the
Hi,
I am not sure if there is any people want to help, because I asked this
few days ago. I worked hard to test these packages, and did a lot of
bugs fixed. However, it make me quite sad that there seems no one to
help.
Anyway, my packages are,
cce (console/X11 CJK environment) -- new upstream
would it be possiable for you to explain to me how to comment out lines?
thank you. ron
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
* Cai Qian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040928 20:40]:
I am not sure if there is any people want to help, because I asked this
few days ago. I worked hard to test these packages, and did a lot of
bugs fixed. However, it make me quite sad that there seems no one to
help.
sorry for not giving you
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 02:22:38PM -0400, ron r wrote:
would it be possiable for you to explain to me how to comment out lines?
Try http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
thank you. ron
You are welcome
Cheers
Geert Stappers
pgpO3jJCSKuEA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Please don't take that personally, but I guess the situation is similar
for the people here who are ready to sponsor.
I see, but I wish there will be more people to help, because the DD
application goes on slowly. Anyway, thanks.
ftp-ssl
ftpd-ssl -- bugs fixed, new maintainer
You mean
Hi,
I'm still looking for a sponsor for emailrelay package. I'm still
improving the init script so this isn't yet perfect. But i think it's
now in a state it can go into debian archive.
Maybe someone will look at it.
My packages are available at:
http://www.cacholong.nl/~matthijs/emailrelay
Hi Dmitry,
On Saturday 25 September 2004 06:14 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Description: CLI tools to burn, catalog data and audio CD-R[W]s
This sentence confuses me, as audio is not a verb. Do you mean CLI tools
to burn and catalog data and audio CDs, or do I misunderstand the intended
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 09:06:37PM -0400, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote:
Description: CLI tools to burn, catalog data and audio CD-R[W]s
This sentence confuses me, as audio is not a verb. Do you mean CLI tools
to burn and catalog data and audio CDs, or do I misunderstand the intended
On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 21:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You understand it right, however, I didn't want to put and there
because it is not necessary to burn *and* catalog, you can do either or
both, so I thought that a comma would be more appropriate.
How about burn and/or catalog data and
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 11:02:28 +0200
Ricardo Mones Lastra- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Providing an URL for the package you want to be sponsored is usually
a good idea.
regards,
Thank you, Ricardo, for pointing this mistake out. A little more study
on my part (before posting for a sponsor) might
On Tuesday 28 September 2004 09:52 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You understand it right, however, I didn't want to put and there
because it is not necessary to burn *and* catalog, you can do either or
both, so I thought that a comma would be more appropriate.
Unfortunately, a comma there is
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 11:11:10PM -0400, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote:
You understand it right, however, I didn't want to put and there
because it is not necessary to burn *and* catalog, you can do either or
both, so I thought that a comma would be more appropriate.
Unfortunately, a comma
Martin Braure de Calignon wrote:
http://www.enseirb.fr/~braurede/deb_dev/pharmacy
I used to maintain pharmacy, i'll take a look at it if no one has helped
you yet.
--
.''`. Somewhere in Texas there is a village without its idiot
: :' :
`. `' Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (Sid 2.6.6
Hello Hubert,
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 09:32:50AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 07:25:45PM -0400, Hubert Chan wrote:
I am compiling under. What is the suggested/easiest/best/proper/Debian
way to do this?
dpkg --print-architecture.
Actually, I think the more proper
I'm the maintainer of two packages, say A and B. B build depends on A, i
uploaded a bugged version of A, which inhibit building of B. Now I've
fixed the problem, but B needs to be rebuilt on all architectures.
Is there a single person/email address I can ask for rebuilding package
B on all archs?
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 08:51:07AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I'm the maintainer of two packages, say A and B. B build depends on A, i
uploaded a bugged version of A, which inhibit building of B. Now I've
fixed the problem, but B needs to be rebuilt on all architectures.
Is there a
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 08:51:07AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I can also reupload a new version of B, but it would be inappropriate
since nothing changed in that package.
I think it's the preferred method, though. Certainly I've had bugs filed on
my packages to upload a new version so
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 06:12:27PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 08:51:07AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I can also reupload a new version of B, but it would be inappropriate
since nothing changed in that package.
I think it's the preferred method, though.
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 06:12:27PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
I think it's the preferred method, though. Certainly I've had bugs filed on
my packages to upload a new version so that the package gets rebuilt against
a new ABI.
Beware that my package B has not been built against the wrong
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 01:19:24AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 06:12:27PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 08:51:07AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I can also reupload a new version of B, but it would be inappropriate
since nothing changed
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 07:56:37PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
The issue is that providing a package for a webapp that only integrates
with certain webserver packages in Debian splits the userbase between
those who have a reason to want to use your package, and those who have
to do the
On 20040927T192545-0400, Hubert Chan wrote:
In order to compile these properly, I need to detect what architecture
I am compiling under. What is the suggested/easiest/best/proper/Debian
way to do this?
I assume what yuo really want to know is what architecture you are
compiling _for_ instead
Hi,
I am not sure if there is any people want to help, because I asked this
few days ago. I worked hard to test these packages, and did a lot of
bugs fixed. However, it make me quite sad that there seems no one to
help.
Anyway, my packages are,
cce (console/X11 CJK environment) -- new upstream
would it be possiable for you to explain to me how to comment out lines?
thank you. ron
Hi,
* Cai Qian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040928 20:40]:
I am not sure if there is any people want to help, because I asked this
few days ago. I worked hard to test these packages, and did a lot of
bugs fixed. However, it make me quite sad that there seems no one to
help.
sorry for not giving you
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 02:22:38PM -0400, ron r wrote:
would it be possiable for you to explain to me how to comment out lines?
Try http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
thank you. ron
You are welcome
Cheers
Geert Stappers
pgpK41JH8uMIS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Please don't take that personally, but I guess the situation is similar
for the people here who are ready to sponsor.
I see, but I wish there will be more people to help, because the DD
application goes on slowly. Anyway, thanks.
ftp-ssl
ftpd-ssl -- bugs fixed, new maintainer
You mean
Hi,
I'm still looking for a sponsor for emailrelay package. I'm still
improving the init script so this isn't yet perfect. But i think it's
now in a state it can go into debian archive.
Maybe someone will look at it.
My packages are available at:
http://www.cacholong.nl/~matthijs/emailrelay
Hi Dmitry,
On Saturday 25 September 2004 06:14 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Description: CLI tools to burn, catalog data and audio CD-R[W]s
This sentence confuses me, as audio is not a verb. Do you mean CLI tools
to burn and catalog data and audio CDs, or do I misunderstand the intended
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 09:06:37PM -0400, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote:
Description: CLI tools to burn, catalog data and audio CD-R[W]s
This sentence confuses me, as audio is not a verb. Do you mean CLI tools
to burn and catalog data and audio CDs, or do I misunderstand the intended
On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 21:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You understand it right, however, I didn't want to put and there
because it is not necessary to burn *and* catalog, you can do either or
both, so I thought that a comma would be more appropriate.
How about burn and/or catalog data and
On Tuesday 28 September 2004 09:52 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You understand it right, however, I didn't want to put and there
because it is not necessary to burn *and* catalog, you can do either or
both, so I thought that a comma would be more appropriate.
Unfortunately, a comma there is
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 11:11:10PM -0400, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote:
You understand it right, however, I didn't want to put and there
because it is not necessary to burn *and* catalog, you can do either or
both, so I thought that a comma would be more appropriate.
Unfortunately, a comma
39 matches
Mail list logo
