On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 12:55:06 +0100
J. M. D. Mendinueta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I make the package on several Debian boxes downloading the sources
with APT, and seems to work well.
Working well is good, but there is some quality standards a package must
satisfy to be accepted in Debian. A
Hi.
After asking him wether he would want to keep maintaining the package
himself (and offering help in doing so), alternatively offering to take
it over myself, Tommi told me to take it over. His mail regarding this
matter is available on request.
The nslint package I created took over
Hello Alec,
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 09:52:19PM -0400, Alec Berryman wrote:
Hi mentors,
I adopted rdiff-backup and have a new revision ready that fixes ten
outstanding bugs, leaving only one of non-wishlist priority.
When I adopted rdiff-backup I received two sponsorship offers, but the
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 05:49:05PM +0100, Sven Mueller wrote:
One question though: should I file an ITA against nslint first, or was
it enough to consult Tommi and upload with the new maintainer
name/address in control file and changelog?
It's not been orphaned in the traditional sense so
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 05:18:22PM -0500, Jan Medlock wrote:
martin f krafft wrote:
Do we need htp when there is wml?
I've not looked at wml, but even if they have the same functionality,
variety has always been a strength of Debian.
...and package bloat is a weakness of Debian...
--
For
On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 10:05:48AM -0300, Antonio S. de A. Terceiro wrote:
Joel Baker escreveu isso aí:
[cut]
Will this approach make manual porting unnecessary?
Sadly, no, at least if I understand you correctly. Because, four months
down the road when you've uploaded another copy to
also sprach Jan Medlock [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.11.10.2318 +0100]:
I've not looked at wml, but even if they have the same
functionality, variety has always been a strength of Debian. That
and I've just offered to maintain the package, with the help of
a sponsor.
If you think that htp is
On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 12:55:06 +0100
J. M. D. Mendinueta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I make the package on several Debian boxes downloading the sources
with APT, and seems to work well.
Working well is good, but there is some quality standards a package must
satisfy to be accepted in Debian. A
Hi.
After asking him wether he would want to keep maintaining the package
himself (and offering help in doing so), alternatively offering to take
it over myself, Tommi told me to take it over. His mail regarding this
matter is available on request.
The nslint package I created took over
Hello Alec,
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 09:52:19PM -0400, Alec Berryman wrote:
Hi mentors,
I adopted rdiff-backup and have a new revision ready that fixes ten
outstanding bugs, leaving only one of non-wishlist priority.
When I adopted rdiff-backup I received two sponsorship offers, but the
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 05:49:05PM +0100, Sven Mueller wrote:
One question though: should I file an ITA against nslint first, or was
it enough to consult Tommi and upload with the new maintainer
name/address in control file and changelog?
It's not been orphaned in the traditional sense so
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 05:18:22PM -0500, Jan Medlock wrote:
martin f krafft wrote:
Do we need htp when there is wml?
I've not looked at wml, but even if they have the same functionality,
variety has always been a strength of Debian.
...and package bloat is a weakness of Debian...
--
For
On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 10:05:48AM -0300, Antonio S. de A. Terceiro wrote:
Joel Baker escreveu isso aí:
[cut]
Will this approach make manual porting unnecessary?
Sadly, no, at least if I understand you correctly. Because, four months
down the road when you've uploaded another copy to
13 matches
Mail list logo
