Hello!
I would like to add a small statistics software to Debian
official packages. Statist home page currently is on:
http://www.usf.uos.de/~breiter/tools/statist/index.en.html
Soon we will have a new release of statist (1.3.1), and I've
edited a script that creates a binary .deb file. (I
Hi, Jakson..
On Wednesday 02 November 2005 14:41, Jakson A. Aquino wrote:
I would like to add a small statistics software to Debian
official packages. Statist home page currently is on:
http://www.usf.uos.de/~breiter/tools/statist/index.en.html
Soon we will have a new release of statist
Hi,
I'm working on some big changes for the new upstream of the erlang packages.
The biggest change is that the package is now fully using dpatch, *but*,
basing myself on some other package I've seen (coreutils for example), I've
put the compressed upstream right in the package. It is
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 11:41:35AM -0200, Jakson A. Aquino wrote:
Hello!
I would like to add a small statistics software to Debian
official packages. Statist home page currently is on:
http://www.usf.uos.de/~breiter/tools/statist/index.en.html
Soon we will have a new release of
On 2 November 2005 09:13, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on some big changes for the new upstream of the erlang
packages. The biggest change is that the package is now fully using
dpatch, *but*, basing myself on some other package I've seen (coreutils
for example), I've put the
On 2 November 2005 09:13, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on some big changes for the new upstream of the erlang
packages. The biggest change is that the package is now fully using
dpatch, *but*, basing myself on some other package I've seen (coreutils
for example), I've put the
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 10:08:13AM -0500, Fran?ois-Denis Gonthier wrote:
On 2 November 2005 09:13, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on some big changes for the new upstream of the erlang
packages. The biggest change is that the package is now fully using
dpatch, *but*, basing
Justin Pryzby wrote:
for example), I've put the compressed upstream right in the package. It
Also, how does this work WRT pristine source requirements? I notice
that coreutils embedded upstream tarball is pristine, but of course
the .orig is not.
IMO this isn't a political problem - the
On 2 November 2005 10:42, Justin Pryzby wrote:
[Changed to a more suitable subject]
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 10:08:13AM -0500, Fran?ois-Denis Gonthier wrote:
On 2 November 2005 09:13, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on some big changes for the new upstream of the erlang
Hi Justin,
Thanks for your help!
I see. You'll want to read the New Maint Guide at
http://www.debian.org/devel/
I'm following the instructions from maint-guide,
but when I do the command:
dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -d
The result is:
dpkg-gencontrol: error: control file must have at
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 01:30:06PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
It has to have at least 2 stanzas; the first is for the source
package, and the rest are for binary packages created by that source
package. Maybe check other people's control files for examples.
2 stanzas: It worked: I put back
On 2005-11-02, Jakson A. Aquino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that I don't need the files below:
dirs postinst.ex preinst.ex statist-default.ex
compat postrm.exprerm.ex
Can I delete them?
Try ;)
- or at least move them to somewhere else ;)
(compat are needed)
/Sune
--
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 05:46:23PM -0200, Jakson A. Aquino wrote:
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 01:30:06PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
It has to have at least 2 stanzas; the first is for the source
package, and the rest are for binary packages created by that source
package. Maybe check other
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 03:03:47PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
Deleted from then end? Most unix editors always put a newline at the
end of a file; what editor are you using?
I'm using a good editor, but I deleted manually a line
between the source and the package part of the control file.
I'm
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 06:24:27PM -0200, Jakson A. Aquino wrote:
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 03:03:47PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
Deleted from then end? Most unix editors always put a newline at the
end of a file; what editor are you using?
I'm using a good editor, but I deleted manually a
I demand that François-Denis Gonthier may or may not have written...
On 2 November 2005 09:13, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
I'm working on some big changes for the new upstream of the erlang
packages. The biggest change is that the package is now fully using
dpatch, *but*, basing myself on some
On 2 November 2005 15:54, Darren Salt wrote:
Use lsdiff (in patchutils) to find out if a patch is in the wrong place:
$ lsdiff -z ../foo_1.2.3-4.diff.gz | grep -v /debian/
You can move the offending patches into a file in debian/patches/ with
filterdiff and dpatch-edit-patch:
$
Thank you for your quick and courtious reply. I made the suggested changes,
and the new packages is availible at geocities.com/vze49jxa.
Regarding the communication problem, I can also be emailed at
[EMAIL PROTECTED], which should work fine with European mail servers.
Some things to note:
1.
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 03:30:51PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
It would be possible, but not desirable IMHO, and probably not in the
opinion of many people here. Documentation files are rarely used :)
Seriously, though, xpdf is linked with zlib anyway, and transparently
handles .pdf.gz, and
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 05:21:26PM -0500, Daniel Milstein wrote:
2. The upstream package is not *NIX specific, so I am unsure of the
appropriateness of sending the manpage upstream. I shall do so if you still
insist that I should, however.
I would suggest it; they can include it an people can
[Daniel, I tried replying to you individually, but your provider is
senselessly blocking mail from huge areas of the internet. Please
pressure them to stop doing that.]
On 02-Nov-2005, Daniel Milstein wrote:
I was unsure whether I was supposed to reply to you personally or
reply via the mailing
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 08:51:25PM -0200, Jakson A. Aquino wrote:
On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 03:30:51PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
It would be possible, but not desirable IMHO, and probably not in the
opinion of many people here. Documentation files are rarely used :)
Seriously, though,
Sorry about that. Thanks for the link.
Verizon refuses to listen to requests to unblock half the world.
-Daniel J. Milstein
On Wednesday 02 November 2005 6:18 pm, Ben Finney wrote:
[Daniel, I tried replying to you individually, but your provider is
senselessly blocking mail from huge areas of
Hi
Also, how does this work WRT pristine source requirements? I notice
that coreutils embedded upstream tarball is pristine, but of course
the .orig is not.
That's the kind of question I'm looking answers for. In the developer
manual,
it is clearly said that the .orig.tar.gz should
On Tue, 01 Nov 2005, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 11:21:41AM -0400, -.JavaManiac.- wrote:
I have the next linda-warning :
W: libefltk2.0-dev; Shared object /usr/bin/ecalc is linked with
version 6 and 5of libstdc++.
snip
I can't tell of
More of an operational point of view,
it's difficult to look at source code.
Bug #250202 is the one to look at; which seems to have a solution.
With that page, I've got a much better understanding of what and the
advantages and disadvantages of double-tarred source.
I'll look into
26 matches
Mail list logo
