Hi list!
I'm nearly finished with my /magnum opus/, latex-cjk (a LaTeX macro
that allows you to insert Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Thai and
Vietnamese text in a LaTeX document), which you can find at
deb http://chinese.alioth.debian.org latex-cjk/
deb-src http://chinese.alioth.debian.org late
Package name: gmysqlcc
Version : 0.2.5-1
ITP : 344594
URL or Web page : http://gmysqlcc.thepozer.org/
License : GPL
Description : GTK+ client for mysql databases
It will help you to use your MySQL servers, do requests on them, manage
their configuration (users,
Jonas Genannt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok, this is I think an better solution.
> I have updated the packages:
> http://jonas.capi2name.de/debian-upload/libjavascript-rpc-perl/
> (I have make a comment in the debian/copyright, that I have renamed and
> repackaged it)
> So, now I need someon
On Friday 23 December 2005 21:01, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Claudio Moratti said:
> > Hi *!
> > I'm looking for a sponsor for vamps package:
[cut]
> > The package (lintian errors free) is available here:
> > http://www.knio.it/debian/vamps/
>
> My first impresion is that it
On Friday 23 December 2005 20:57, Neil McGovern wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 12:36:41AM +0100, Claudio Moratti wrote:
> > Hi *!
> > I'm looking for a sponsor for vamps package:
>
> Hi there,
>
> Thanks for packaging this, uploaded :)
Thx a lot!
> Neil
Cheers,
Claudio
--
~~>MaXeR <~~
Hom
Hi!
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 12:37:20PM +0100, Joost van Baal wrote:
> Op vr 23 dec 2005 om 02:31:16 -0800 schreef Steve Langasek:
> >
> > I don't know what minimum version of cdebconf (if any) you should specify to
> > get support for settitle.
>
> From the changelog:
>
> cdebconf (0.43)
>
This one time, at band camp, Neil McGovern said:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 12:36:41AM +0100, Claudio Moratti wrote:
> > Hi *!
> > I'm looking for a sponsor for vamps package:
> >
>
> Hi there,
>
> Thanks for packaging this, uploaded :)
Hrm, beat me to it :)
Thanks again,
--
-
This one time, at band camp, Claudio Moratti said:
> Hi *!
> I'm looking for a sponsor for vamps package:
>
> --
> Package: vamps
> Section: graphics
> License: GPL
> Description: Tool to recompress and modify the structure of a DVD
> Vamps reduces the size of DVD compliant MPEG2 program streams
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 12:36:41AM +0100, Claudio Moratti wrote:
> Hi *!
> I'm looking for a sponsor for vamps package:
>
Hi there,
Thanks for packaging this, uploaded :)
Neil
--
__
.` `. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Application Manager
: :' ! | Secure-Testing Team member
'.
Russ Allbery wrote:
> I hate to say this, since actually implementing it is a lot of work in
> supporting programs like debhelper, but if the debconf-2.0 pseudopackage
> was introduced prior to a new feature in the debconf interface there needs
> to be a debconf-2.1 or debconf-3.0 as well. If cdeb
On 12/23/05, Javier Ballesteros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm interesting in adopting this package or help to get this package
> out from orphaned packages. I'm trying to adopt as much packages I
> can, and it seems that this package is still orphaned, so please let
> me know if I can
Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 23-Dec-2005, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > A shebang line is more than documentation: it is a strong
>> > indication that the script will be executable from the command
>> > line. To have that expectation not be matched
"cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 23 December 2005 10:24, Frank Küster wrote:
>
>> The fact that the script is not in the path isn't enough for you here?
>> And don't you think that anyone who knows that a shebang lines indicates
>> executability from the command
On Friday 23 December 2005 10:24, Frank Küster wrote:
> The fact that the script is not in the path isn't enough for you here?
> And don't you think that anyone who knows that a shebang lines indicates
> executability from the command line
shebang line does _not_ indicate executability, it's the
On 23-Dec-2005, Frank Küster wrote:
> Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > A shebang line is more than documentation: it is a strong
> > indication that the script will be executable from the command
> > line. To have that expectation not be matched by the file's
> > permission mode is a recip
Don Armstrong wrote:
>Or you could just say that the version is 0.10-1; which is what
> apparently upstream means anyway.
Ok, this is I think an better solution.
I have updated the packages:
http://jonas.capi2name.de/debian-upload/libjavascript-rpc-perl/
(I have make a comment in the debian/copy
On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 22:14 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> It was deliberate, but not a joke. My point is that there's no
> difference between such names; "Public Flood Software", "FSF", and,
> for example, the "the Debian Installer team" [0].
This is getting a bit off-topic, but from a legal poin
Op vr 23 dec 2005 om 02:31:16 -0800 schreef Steve Langasek:
>
> I don't know what minimum version of cdebconf (if any) you should specify to
> get support for settitle.
From the changelog:
cdebconf (0.43)
"Add new command SETTITLE"
Bye,
Joost
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 09:36:57AM +0100, Michael Hanke wrote:
> > If you depend on newer features than those guaranteed by the debconf-2.0
> > interface, you will need to depend on the providers of those features
> > explicitly, *without* an or on "debconf-2.0".
> Thanks. I did'nt realize this fac
Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 22-Dec-2005, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
>> On Wednesday 21 December 2005 18:41, Bas Wijnen wrote:
>> > If it is meant to be executed, it should be executable.
>> > If it is not, it should not have the shebang line.
>>
>> I disagree, there's not
20 matches
Mail list logo
