Re: RFS: tinyscheme

2006-03-02 Thread Panu Kalliokoski
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 04:21:33PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote: It seems tinyscheme has already been packaged for sid (albeit with an older version), so this is not RFS after all. I'm going to contact the packager. LC_ALL=C apt-cache policy tinyscheme W: Unable to locate package tinyscheme I

Re: Packaging Maven 2 - shipping binaries for bootstrapping.

2006-03-02 Thread Philipp Meier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi debian java folks, hi mentors, I'm posting this to mentors, too, because the problem described below is not only about maven2 but about a general problem with bootstrapping circularely depending packages. More news on packaging maven2. I was able

RFS:Quarry is a multi-purpose GUI for several board games

2006-03-02 Thread Hou ZhengPeng
I'm looking for a sponsor for the following package:   ITP:            : #354094   Package name    : quarry   Version         : 0.1.16   Upstream Author : Paul Pogonyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED]   URL             : http://home.gna.org/quarry/index.html   License         : GPL source package

Re: RFS: libopenobex (also includes openobex-apps and ircp)

2006-03-02 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Hi, there is still no sponsor for these packages, so this is another post to find sponsors for obexobex. Am Montag, 20. Februar 2006 12:33 schrieb Simon Richter: Are you by chance interested in taking over ussp-push as well? I am not sure as obexftp can do the same thing by now (and qobex,

Re: RFS: libopenobex (also includes openobex-apps and ircp)

2006-03-02 Thread Simon Richter
Hi, Hendrik Sattler wrote: there is still no sponsor for these packages, so this is another post to find sponsors for obexobex. Uploaded now. Had trouble with my smartcard reader. Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: libopenobex (also includes openobex-apps and ircp)

2006-03-02 Thread Simon Richter
Hi, Hendrik Sattler wrote: Really? I thought PUSH was pretty much a different protocol, with a different purpose, on a different channel, just using the same object format. So to replace ussp-push, you can simply use the obexftp options -H -U none And maybe omit the -l option in this case.

change group password in batch mode

2006-03-02 Thread Jonas Meurer
hello, for lurker i need to set the lurker system group password in postinst. unfortunately there seems to be no way for changing group passwords in batch mode. for system user passwords 'chpasswd' exists, but i cannot find an equivalent for system group passwords. would it be generally useful?

Re: RFC/RFS: beef - a flexible BrainFuck interpreter

2006-03-02 Thread Andrea Bolognani
Hi again, mentors! I'm sending this to renew my RFC/RFS, and also to notice I moved all the files needed for beef in a new location. The new URLs are: * http://www.kiyuko.org/debian/beef_0.0.3.orig.tar.gz * http://www.kiyuko.org/debian/beef_0.0.3-1.diff.gz *

Re: RFC/RFS: beef - a flexible BrainFuck interpreter

2006-03-02 Thread Lionel Elie Mamane
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 06:55:11PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote: I'm sending this to renew my RFC/RFS, and also to notice I moved all the files needed for beef in a new location. The new URLs are: * http://www.kiyuko.org/debian/beef_0.0.3.orig.tar.gz *

Re: RFS: tinyscheme

2006-03-02 Thread Joe Smith
Panu Kalliokoski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Yup, seems the ITP was erronously closed by some totally unrelated control message... if I understand correctly. Anyway, I contacted the submitter of the ITP. Panu If you are talking about

Re: RFC/RFS: beef - a flexible BrainFuck interpreter

2006-03-02 Thread Andrea Bolognani
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 20:24:48 +0100 Lionel Elie Mamane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You really think that thing should be priority optional? I'd say extra. The policy says Priority: extra is for packages which are only likely to be useful if you already know what they are or have specialized

Re: RFS: tinyscheme

2006-03-02 Thread atehwa
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 04:27:54PM -0500, Joe Smith wrote: Panu Kalliokoski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Yup, seems the ITP was erronously closed by some totally unrelated control message... if I understand correctly. Anyway, I contacted the submitter of the