Re: RFS: urw-garamond -- scalable PostScript font from the Garamond family

2006-06-04 Thread Rogério Brito
Hi, Kevin. On May 22 2006, Kevin Bube wrote: > I will see if I can do a separate package for testing. No need to spend your time now doing a separate package for testing: xorg 7 has already migrated into etch. OTOH, having it not depending on xorg 7 may make things easier for those who want to u

apertium

2006-06-04 Thread Francis Tyers
I'm looking for a sponsor to upload apertium and related shared library and development package. ITP here: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/08/msg00084.html (I have been in contact with Sergio who filed the ITP. He is ok with me packaging it as he is busy). Package here: http://82.133

Re: [RFS] kde-style-klearlook: Clone of GNOME's Clearlooks theme

2006-06-04 Thread Matej Cepl
Christoph Haas wrote: > Very well. This looks sane. Your package is now uploaded. Thanks. Thanks a lot. Matej -- GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/blog/, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 23 Marion St. #3, (617) 876-1259, ICQ 132822213 There is

Re: optional building of a package

2006-06-04 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 05:23:37PM +1000, Matthew Palmer a écrit : > > I am working on packaging probcons, which consists of two main programs > > carrying the core functionalities, and a few other programs with > > ambiguous names (convert, makegunplut, project) which will not be useful > > to the

Re: Debian package without released upstream source

2006-06-04 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
Hi Jörg! On 6/4/06, Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I saw on http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=10646&release_id=241671 > that it's a release candidate version, right? No. The source is here: http://dev.atmarama.org/xindy-2.2-beta2.tar.gz It's really outside of sour

Re: Debian package without released upstream source

2006-06-04 Thread Jörg Sommer
Hallo Nelson, Nelson A. de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > On 6/4/06, Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Now, my question is: Can I release a package that bases on not-released >> sources? If so, I request for an sponsor. Otherwise, what should I do? >> Wait? > > Well... you c

RFC: xindy

2006-06-04 Thread Jörg Sommer
Hi, I would like to see my package xindy (#362584) is uploaded to unstable. My package is here: deb-src http://www.minet.uni-jena.de/~joergs/debian ./ * Package name: xindy Version : 2.2-beta2-1 Upstream Author : Joachim Schrod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://xin

Re: RFC/RFS: bfilter, aspell-hr, myspell-hr

2006-06-04 Thread Vedran Furač
Kari Pahula wrote: > On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 10:55:32PM +0200, Vedran Fura? wrote: >> Kari Pahula wrote: >>> Ok. Looks quite good, already. Still, a few things about the Debian >>> I would like to see the /etc/bfilter files put into a bfilter-common >>> package and have bfilter and bfilter-gui de

Re: RFS: mpdscribble

2006-06-04 Thread Michal Čihař
Hi On Sat, 3 Jun 2006 20:09:27 +0200 Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 10:44:16PM +0200, Michal Čihař wrote: > > I'm looking for sponsor to upload new upstream version of mpdscribble. > > It is already in archives [1], but original sponsor lost interest in > > up

Re: [RFS] kde-style-klearlook: Clone of GNOME's Clearlooks theme

2006-06-04 Thread Christoph Haas
On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 02:24:20PM -0400, Matej Cepl wrote: > Christoph Haas wrote: > > I forgot one thing. Please name the source package in debian/control > > identical to the binary package that you create. That's easier in the > > Debian namespace unless you plan to extend your source package t

Re: Debian package without released upstream source

2006-06-04 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
Hi! On 6/4/06, Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Now, my question is: Can I release a package that bases on not-released sources? If so, I request for an sponsor. Otherwise, what should I do? Wait? Well... you can. I saw on http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=10646&rel

Re: [RFS] kde-style-klearlook: Clone of GNOME's Clearlooks theme

2006-06-04 Thread Matej Cepl
Christoph Haas wrote: > I forgot one thing. Please name the source package in debian/control > identical to the binary package that you create. That's easier in the > Debian namespace unless you plan to extend your source package to > provide different binary packages. Do you? Done. Matej -- GP

Debian package without released upstream source

2006-06-04 Thread Jörg Sommer
Hi, I've created a package for Xindy (#362584) on the basis of a not released upstream source, because the upstream maintainer told me that the old source tree should be replaced and the old source didn't build really fine. Nearly one month ago I've asked the maintainer to release the source, but

free gameboy

2006-06-04 Thread michael kwayisi
1. Full Name:  michael kwayisi2. Email Add:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]3. Telephone Number:  00233-531-259264. Country:  ghana   thanx Sneak preview the all-new Yahoo.com. It's not radically different. Just radically better.

RFS: python-musicbrainz2

2006-06-04 Thread Lukáš Lalinský
Hi, I'm looking for a sponsor for python-musicbrainz2 package. python-musicbrainz2 is a client library, written in Python, for accessing MusicBrainz data using the new MB XML web service. It's released under BSD license. The package itself is using cdbs, I tried to keep debian/rules as simple as

Re: RFC/RFS: bfilter, aspell-hr, myspell-hr

2006-06-04 Thread Kari Pahula
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 10:55:32PM +0200, Vedran Fura? wrote: > Kari Pahula wrote: > > Ok. Looks quite good, already. Still, a few things about the Debian > > I would like to see the /etc/bfilter files put into a bfilter-common > > package and have bfilter and bfilter-gui depend on bfilter-common

Re: Question about linux-wlan-ng-firmware in main

2006-06-04 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Tue, 30 May 2006, Bas Wijnen wrote: > Packages containing some contrib material, without which the package functions > well, can indeed go in main AFAIK. Yes. That's enough. If you agree on that why do you need after that to find a complicated explication on why finally this is not OK ? > Howe