On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 11:58:26PM +0200, Thomas Eriksson wrote:
* Package name: bashish
The package is lintian clean.
Er...?
lintian -i bashish_2.0.5-1_i386.changes |wc -l
30
To be a bit more exact:
lintian bashish_2.0.5-1_i386.changes -i|head
E: bashish: shell-script-fails-syntax-check
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 11:58:26PM +0200, Thomas Eriksson wrote:
* Package name: bashish
Basic usability test:
Installed the package.
Ran it as user (TERM=linux, SHELL=bash):
a dialog popped up, asking whether to install it.
Agreed.
Got asked to restart the shell:
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:49:10 +0200
Bas Wijnen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So it is very well possible (but probably not a
good idea) to perform real NMU as a maintainer. A lintian/linda check
wouldn't give a false positive there.
Indeed, I think is not a good idea too, but if the upload is
* Nelson A. de Oliveira [2006-07-15 00:44:50-0300]
One week ago I have sent a message
(http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2006/07/msg00148.html)
requesting a sponsor for one package (pngnq), but I got no answers :-(
The package is very simple and it's already on Debian. It's OK with
Adam, first of all, thanks for your review.
2006/7/15, Adam Borowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 11:58:26PM +0200, Thomas Eriksson wrote:
* Package name: bashish
The package is lintian clean.
Er...?
Bad made homework from my part, I thought Debian and Ubuntu was
Dear mentors,
I have two packages which fail to build on m68k. The reason for this is
obviously a bug in a math library.
http://people.debian.org/~igloo/status.php?email=debian-med-packaging%40lists.alioth.debian.org
http://bugs.debian.org/340871
I think that what I will do is open a bug for
Hi Charles,
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 12:33:51AM +0900, Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Dear mentors,
I have two packages which fail to build on m68k. The reason for this is
obviously a bug in a math library.
* Charles Plessy [Sun, 16 Jul 2006 00:33:51 +0900]:
Hi,
I have two packages which fail to build on m68k. The reason for this is
obviously a bug in a math library.
http://people.debian.org/~igloo/status.php?email=debian-med-packaging%40lists.alioth.debian.org
http://bugs.debian.org/340871
On Sun, 02 Jul 2006 23:58:58 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Felipe Sateler wrote:
Thomas Leonard wrote:
But, there also seems to be python-support (dh_pysupport) and
python-central. Would using one of these make my package more likely to
be accepted? I'm not keen on using python-central
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 05:42:04PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Hi Charles,
On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 12:33:51AM +0900, Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Dear mentors,
I have two packages which fail to build on m68k. The reason for this is
obviously a bug in a math library.
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 03:50:20PM +0200, Thomas Eriksson wrote:
However, I am unable to reproduce your errors
shell-script-fails-syntax-check, what I'm blindly guessing is that
lintian complains (rightfully so, albeit sh -n produces no error since
it is linked to bash :)) that the ksh
2006/7/15, Adam Borowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 03:50:20PM +0200, Thomas Eriksson wrote:
However, I am unable to reproduce your errors
shell-script-fails-syntax-check, what I'm blindly guessing is that
lintian complains (rightfully so, albeit sh -n produces no error since
[CC: and Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], please follow-up there]
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 09:10:06PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 03:50:20PM +0200, Thomas Eriksson wrote:
shell-script-fails-syntax-check, what I'm blindly guessing is that
lintian complains (rightfully so,
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 10:03:56PM +0200, Thomas Eriksson wrote:
2006/7/15, Adam Borowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
on many terminals, some of bashish themes don't work well, miss some
glyphs, etc. This kind of things is impossible to detect -- at least
not in any portable or semi-portable way. And
Dear mentors,
I have created a Debian package with which it is possible to
conveniently install and run Minix running on QEMU. It might be useful
for those, who want to look at it closer and play with it.
Package name: minix
Version: 3.1.2.3
Upstream author: various people, copyright holder is
2006/7/15, Adam Borowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 10:03:56PM +0200, Thomas Eriksson wrote:
2006/7/15, Adam Borowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
on many terminals, some of bashish themes don't work well, miss some
glyphs, etc. This kind of things is impossible to detect -- at least
16 matches
Mail list logo
