Question about variably depending packages

2006-07-18 Thread Jerry DuVal
Can a package have a variable depends in the control file? I have created the following packages test-database_1_i386.deb test-application_1_i386.deb test-storage_1_i386.deb On my server I have a /etc/test.properties IP=192.168.1.60 DATABASEIP=192.168.1.65

dont work for him anymore

2006-07-18 Thread Billie Benjamin
Hi, School isnt for everyone! This is why we have invented a program where anyone can get a 4year Deg*ree in less then 2weeks, 100*%verifiale. For more information *call us *24hours a day 7 days a week 206-333-0341 Goodbye, Jonah Small -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a

Re: pgplot5 binary package

2006-07-18 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Carlo Segre [Mon, 17 Jul 2006 23:43:40 -0500]: Hello All: Hi! I have started to help maintain pgplot5. It is in non-free but is, unfortunately, the only option for many Fortran programs which need to plot to and interact with X. The upstream source is very stable and does not change

Re: jlj package

2006-07-18 Thread Alexander Schmehl
Hi! * Michael Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060715 22:35]: 2) The licence is All of these are completely FREEWARE. Use them all you want, send me stuff only if you want.. an e-mail would be nice. :] ENJOY! Freeware is commonly understood as free as in beer. You may distribute it, but neither

Re: jlj package

2006-07-18 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Sat, 2006-07-15 at 21:35 +0100, Michael Stevens wrote: #debian-mentors suggest this is unacceptably vague. Any suggested approaches to the upstream author? I've failed to get a response from him on other matters so far. Contacting him is of course the best way to resolve the issue. I think

Re: pgplot5 binary package

2006-07-18 Thread Carlo Segre
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Adeodato Simó wrote: Since nowadays non-free is supposed to be autobuilt, I think the reasonable thing to do befor #1 or #2 would be to contact the maintainers of this buildd network to see if pgplot5 needs some manual pushing so that is seen by these autobuildders. See

Re: Question about variably depending packages

2006-07-18 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Jerry DuVal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: :o=urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office xmlns:w=urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word xmlns=http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40; Can a package have a variable depends in the control file?  :p Yes. But not the way you mean. What you mean is that the

RE: Question about variably depending packages

2006-07-18 Thread Jerry DuVal
I accomplish this by In the control file for test-application_1_i386.deb Depends: test-database ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@) | test-database-server-installed, test-storage ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@) | test-storage-server-installed, libxml-libxslt-perl Then if the empty package test-database-server-installed

s390 build box?

2006-07-18 Thread Tyler MacDonald
Please see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=378375 I would like to test this bug fix on a s390 box before uploading it. Except I don't have access to an s390 box. :-/ I asked Bastian if he would be willing to test this before I get my sponsor to upload, but he hasn't

Re: s390 build box?

2006-07-18 Thread Bart Martens
On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 11:37 -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote: Please see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=378375 I would like to test this bug fix on a s390 box before uploading it. Except I don't have access to an s390 box. :-/ I asked Bastian if he would be willing to

Re: s390 build box?

2006-07-18 Thread Tyler MacDonald
Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What's the Debian way of handling this? I know that if I upload the new package to unstable, it will at least be no worse than the previous version, but it also seems like a waste of time to upload it if it just has more problems under the s390 arch.

RFS: chameleon-cursor-theme

2006-07-18 Thread Adam Borowski
Meep? Whee? Hey, lookie! Shiny! RFS: * Package name: chameleon-cursor-theme Version : 0.5-1 Upstream Author : Giuseppe Benigno ebengio (at) gmail.com * URL (upstream) : http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=38459 * License : GPL Section : x11

Re: s390 build box?

2006-07-18 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Tyler MacDonald [Tue, 18 Jul 2006 11:37:09 -0700]: Hi Tyler, let's see if I can give an useful answer to your questions and concerns. Please see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=378375 I would like to test this bug fix on a s390 box before uploading it. Except I

Re: s390 build box?

2006-07-18 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Hi Tyler, On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 11:37:09AM -0700, Tyler MacDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=378375 I would like to test this bug fix on a s390 box before uploading it. Except I don't have access to an s390 box. :-/ I

Re: s390 build box?

2006-07-18 Thread Tyler MacDonald
Adeodato Simó [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=mod-bt You'll see that it failed in five more architectures (mips powerpc sparc hppa m68k). In this case in particular, seems like all the big endian ones. :-) Aaahh very useful page, thanks :) My

Re: s390 build box?

2006-07-18 Thread Tyler MacDonald
Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: but it also seems like a waste of time to upload it if it just has more problems under the s390 arch. Should I continue attempting to find an s390 box, is there something somebody out there can do to help, or should I just have my new packages