Laurent Bigonville wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.8-3
of my package pam-keyring.
You don't need to look for a new sponsor for each new revision. It's
common to use the same sponsor for the same package (or for all
packages) again, unless you are not unconfident with
Daniel Baumann wrote:
Laurent Bigonville wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.8-3
of my package pam-keyring.
You don't need to look for a new sponsor for each new revision. It's
common to use the same sponsor for the same package (or for all
packages) again, unless
Le vendredi 19 janvier 2007 15:30, Romain Beauxis a écrit :
Hi mentors !
Hi again !
Just another request for sponsoring.. If any one could have time to
review/uplaod this package it would be great !
I'm looking for a sponsor for this package:
* Package name :
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 06:37:28PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 10:22:41PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
What happens is that liferea is held-back. I've tried adding or taking
out a
Provides: liferea-gtkhtml
to the liferea package, with no results.
Hi,
I'm looking for a sponsor to upload Tellico 1.2.5-1 available at
http://www.imalip.info/tellico/etch/tellico_1.2.5-1.dsc
This version is specifically aimed at Etch, including patches picked
from the following releases with the help from upstream author. The
package has just been rebuilt with
Dear mentors,
I am trying to create a Debian package for the Pict programming language.
http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/papers/pict/Html/Pict.html
The package itself is here
http://altair.dcs.elf.stuba.sk/~kosik/debian/pool/main/p/pict/pict_4.1.0-1.dsc
I have successfully built it within
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 10:33:38PM +0100, Matej Kosik wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am trying to create a Debian package for the Pict programming language.
http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/papers/pict/Html/Pict.html
The package itself is here
Le Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 12:13:26PM +0100, Luca Capello a écrit :
I was wondering if having two packages with only one or two files [1]
was worth it, because in this case we have 4 times [2] the same
changelog.gz, changelog.Debian.gz, copyright and README.
Dear Luca,
If the lib package ships
Matej Kosik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
SPECULATION
Major part of the orignal binary is compiled from OCAML sources so maybe
there is some specific error behavior of dh_strip related to these kind
of binaries.
/SPECULATION
Sort of the other way around. You can't strip Objective CAML
Hi list,
as you probably all know, conffiles from older package versions are kept
on package upgrades, even if the new package version does not ship the
conffile anymore.
How do I best get rid of such an old/obsolete conffile?
Simply delete it in preinst? Do I have to check if it was modified
On Fre, 09 Feb 2007, Michael Biebl wrote:
I have to get rid of the old conffile somehow (I formerly had two files
foo and bar. In the new package version, the content of foo has been
included in bar, so I want to get rid of foo, otherwise I get clashes).
Well the optimum solution is the
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 22:33 +0100, Matej Kosik wrote:
SPECULATION
Major part of the orignal binary is compiled from OCAML sources so maybe
there is some specific error behavior of dh_strip related to these kind
of binaries.
/SPECULATION
Read the ocaml policy, but you are correct, dh_strip
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 01:33:54PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 06:37:28PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 10:22:41PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
What happens is that liferea is held-back. I've tried adding or taking
13 matches
Mail list logo
