RFS: hwinfo (updated package)

2007-07-03 Thread William Vera
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 13.35-2 of my package hwinfo. It builds these binary packages: hwinfo - Hardware identification system libhd13- Hardware identification system library libhd13-dev - Hardware identification system library and headers libhd13-doc

Re: ampache sponsor

2007-07-03 Thread Paul Wise
On 7/1/07, Charlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ampache- A web based audio file management system written in PHP I attended the debian-security talk at debconf. Lets just say that PHP isn't popular with them :) Have you audited the code so that the security team don't have to do it when you

Re: RFS: command-not-found

2007-07-03 Thread Michael Vogt
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 10:46:13PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: Christoph Haas wrote: On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 10:08:47PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: Dear mentors, [..] It builds these binary packages: command-not-found - Suggest installation of packages in interactive bash

Re: RFS: alien-arena - First person online deathmatch shooter

2007-07-03 Thread Christoph Haas
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 12:11:33AM -0400, Andres Mejia wrote: On 6/29/07, Christoph Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have looked at your package. It looks good and is working. I would just suggest you shorten the texts in debian/copyright and debian/control to less than 80 characters per line.

RFS: tclodbc

2007-07-03 Thread Daniel Rus Morales
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package tclodbc. * Package name: tclodbc Version : 2.5-1 Upstream Author : Roy Nurmi [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/tclodbc * License : BSD Section : devel It builds these

Re: RFS: hwinfo (updated package)

2007-07-03 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Hi, On Tuesday 3 July 2007 10:11, William Vera wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 13.35-2 of my package hwinfo. Thanks for taking the time to adopt an orphaned package. I've checked it out and found: * You're adding a file .pc/.version, probably by accident? * There seems

Licensing problems for mpeg2vidcodec

2007-07-03 Thread François Févotte
Dear Mentors, I would like to package mpeg2vidcodec, which the reference implementation of the MPEG2 codec provided by the MPEG Software Simulation Group[1]. It provides two binaries (mpeg2encode and mpeg2decode), which are needed by ImageMagick to handle MPEG files. However, the authors of

Re: Licensing problems for mpeg2vidcodec

2007-07-03 Thread Neil Williams
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:49:36 +0200 François Févotte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Mentors, I would like to package mpeg2vidcodec, which the reference implementation of the MPEG2 codec provided by the MPEG Software Simulation Group[1]. However, the authors of this software seem to have

Re: Licensing problems for mpeg2vidcodec

2007-07-03 Thread Thomas Jollans
On Tuesday 03 July 2007, François Févotte wrote: Dear Mentors, I would like to package mpeg2vidcodec, which the reference implementation of the MPEG2 codec provided by the MPEG Software Simulation Group[1]. It provides two binaries (mpeg2encode and mpeg2decode), which are needed by

Re: RFS: alien-arena - First person online deathmatch shooter

2007-07-03 Thread Andres Mejia
On 7/3/07, Christoph Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The README.Debian still contains very long lines. Perhaps that can be fixed in a next revision. Other than that the package looks good to me and I'm currently uploading it. Will probably take a while through my 384 kbps uplink. Cheers

RFS: secpanel (updated package)

2007-07-03 Thread Bruno Costacurta
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.5.2-1 of my package secpanel. It builds these binary packages: secpanel - A graphical user interface for SSH and SCP The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 317063 The package can be found on

Re: ITS: libitpp (updated package)

2007-07-03 Thread Neil Williams
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 11:26:34 +0530 Kumar Appaiah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll look into this. What is the alternative to lapack? I'm not sure there is one - lapack isn't the same kind of problem as OK, so here's the plan. I keep the dependency on lapack as it is, and keep checking bug

Looking for sponsor for single NMU of monotone packages

2007-07-03 Thread Zack Weinberg
The Debian packages of monotone have not been updated in some time, and are currently both unbuildable and uninstallable, due to the Boost 1.34 transition. I am one of the upstream developers, and use Debian myself; I asked the maintainer (Shaun Jackman) if he needed help and he said yes, would

Re: ITS: libitpp (updated package)

2007-07-03 Thread Neil Williams
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 22:08:36 +0100 Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now, the updated package is at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libitpp/libitpp_3.99.2-1.dsc Checking it now. If it builds OK, I'll upload. I've checked with pbuilder, installed, uninstalled, purged and

Re: Looking for sponsor for single NMU of monotone packages

2007-07-03 Thread Shaun Jackman
Hello Zack, I unexpectedly have access to a Debian box all this week. I'm on contract and have other commitments, but I should be able to upload monotone for you at some point. My only question is whether the unusual -0.2 version will bungle anything -- although I understand the version number

Re: Looking for sponsor for single NMU of monotone packages

2007-07-03 Thread Zack Weinberg
On 7/3/07, Shaun Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I unexpectedly have access to a Debian box all this week. I'm on contract and have other commitments, but I should be able to upload monotone for you at some point. My only question is whether the unusual -0.2 version will bungle anything --

Re: Looking for sponsor for single NMU of monotone packages

2007-07-03 Thread Shaun Jackman
On 7/3/07, Zack Weinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I *think* dupload should do the Right Thing if applied to the changes file as is (well, re-signed). As a sponsored upload, I'd normally have to rebuild the binaries and the changes file as well. What magic debuild command line did you use? I

ampache security audit

2007-07-03 Thread Charlie
Paul Wise wrote: On 7/1/07, Charlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ampache- A web based audio file management system written in PHP I attended the debian-security talk at debconf. Lets just say that PHP isn't popular with them :) Have you audited the code so that the

Re: Looking for sponsor for single NMU of monotone packages

2007-07-03 Thread Jan C. Nordholz
Hi Shaun, As a sponsored upload, I'd normally have to rebuild the binaries and the changes file as well. What magic debuild command line did you use? I see the .orig.tar.gz file is included in the `Files' section of the .changes file. debuild -sa should do the trick (-sa is passed through to

Re: ampache security audit

2007-07-03 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Hi, You can look at ampaches Code Philosophy at https://ampache.bountysource.com/wiki/Code_Philosophy and ampaches Coding Standards at https://ampache.bountysource.com/wiki/Coding_Standards that's nice to read, but people who write the code should not audit it imho. It's like reading a

RE: ampache security audit

2007-07-03 Thread Charlie
Dear Mr. Bernd Zeimetz Thank you for your comments You can look at ampaches Code Philosophy at https://ampache.bountysource.com/wiki/Code_Philosophy and ampaches Coding Standards at https://ampache.bountysource.com/wiki/Coding_Standards that's nice to read, but people who write

Re: ITS: libitpp (updated package)

2007-07-03 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 10:30:48PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: Now, the updated package is at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libitpp/libitpp_3.99.2-1.dsc Checking it now. If it builds OK, I'll upload. I've checked with pbuilder, installed, uninstalled, purged and all