OFF: centerim -- A text-mode multi-protocol instant messenger client

2007-07-20 Thread Dmitry E. Oboukhov
I'm requesting for sponsor because my advocate and AM are very busy (both), but this package has a long time waiting for upload. Many people are requesting for it because is the direct replace for centericq, many people uses it. Hi! sorry, offtopic :) I've got a couple of questions here :) :

RFS: typo3

2007-07-20 Thread Christian Welzel
Hi there ! As Daniel Baumann do not sponsor packages anymore, im looking for someone who can sponsor and upload my packages of typo3. You can find the neccessary files here: http://typo3.camlann.de/typo3-dummy_4.1.2-1.dsc http://typo3.camlann.de/typo3-src_4.1.2+debian-1.dsc I would be fine if

Re: RFS: hfsprogs - mkfs and fsck for HFS and HFS+ file systems

2007-07-20 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 04:40:52PM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote: I made a package for creating and checking HFS(+) filesystems. The basic information about this package is here Thanks for your quite well written explenation of the corelation of the packages. I take it that you have pretty well

RFS: mxml (updated package)

2007-07-20 Thread Luis Uribe
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.3-1 of my package mxml. It builds these binary packages: libmxml-dev - development files for libmlxml libmxml1 - small XML parsing library The package appears to be lintian clean, but there is a problem with linda: [EMAIL

RFS: sbox-dtc (updated package with pending RC bugfix)

2007-07-20 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi there ! As Daniel Baumann do not sponsor packages anymore, im looking for someone who can sponsor and upload my package of sbox-dtc. Files are here: ftp://ftp.gplhost.com/debian/dists/sid/main/binary-i386/sbox-dtc_1.11-1.dsc Thanks and bye, Thomas Goirand -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Auto-building many manpages: redundant work for the buildds ?

2007-07-20 Thread David Paleino
2007/7/20, Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ... Discussing with Nelson, the co-maintainer of emboss, we were wondering if this mass-building was a bit a waste of buildd time since they are all the same for all arches, and if we could build them offline and ship them in the diff instead. What

Re: Auto-building many manpages: redundant work for the buildds ?

2007-07-20 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Freitag, den 20.07.2007, 12:16 +0900 schrieb Charles Plessy: [EMBOSS manual pages] Discussing with Nelson, the co-maintainer of emboss, we were wondering if this mass-building was a bit a waste of buildd time since they are all the same for all arches, and if we could build them offline and

Re: Auto-building many manpages: redundant work for the buildds ?

2007-07-20 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Freitag, den 20.07.2007, 11:37 +0200 schrieb David Paleino: 2007/7/20, Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ... Discussing with Nelson, the co-maintainer of emboss, we were wondering if this mass-building was a bit a waste of buildd time since they are all the same for all arches, and

Re: RFS: plastex

2007-07-20 Thread François Févotte
Hello, On 7/20/07, Carl Fürstenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: lintian spits out warnings about -x flag on the py-files, as they all has a shebang, also the setup.py generates a cgpdfpng that only will work under OSX, but I don't know a good way to fix that. to remove unneeded shebang lines, I

Problem with git while packaging

2007-07-20 Thread Manuel Prinz
[ I think this is not suited for -user, so asking here. ] Dear Mentors, I started using git for packaging because serveral people at DebConf where really enthusiastic about it. So far, I can totally understand why. It's just great! Nevertheless, a problem I run into is the following: I started

Re: OFF: centerim -- A text-mode multi-protocol instant messenger client

2007-07-20 Thread Anibal Avelar
I've got a couple of questions here :) : 1. Why has centerim been rejected in the previous upload? It was rejected due to license problems. I fixed together the upstreams. Just were details. 2. Were my patches included into new package or not? ;) No, they weren't (yet). this version is

RFS: nagiosgrapher

2007-07-20 Thread Hendrik Frenzel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package nagiosgrapher. * Package name: nagiosgrapher Version : 1.6.1rc3-1 Upstream Author : Gerd Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL :

Re: RFS: plastex

2007-07-20 Thread Carl Fürstenberg
How common is this? i.e. would it be time to implement something like dh_pystrip debhelper thingi? /Carl On 7/20/07, François Févotte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, On 7/20/07, Carl Fürstenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: lintian spits out warnings about -x flag on the py-files, as they all

Re: RFS: plastex

2007-07-20 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Carl Fürstenberg wrote: How common is this? i.e. would it be time to implement something like dh_pystrip debhelper thingi? imho you want to send a bugreport to upstream instead. Cheers, Bernd -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

(no subject)

2007-07-20 Thread Ludovico Cavedon
subscribe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: plastex

2007-07-20 Thread Carl Fürstenberg
On 7/20/07, Bernd Zeimetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: how do you mean by provide a way to repackage the upstream tarball? http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch-best-pkging-practices.en.html#s-bpp-origtargz I would need some help interpret that. 1. must contain detailed

Nagios version

2007-07-20 Thread David Dumortier
Hello, First I'm not fluently in english, I hope my thought will be clear, it's an asking mail. :-) I currently deploy nagios and nagiosgraph. So I decide to package nagiosgraph. But I'm a bit confused about the version of the Debian package. Is there a licence problem about the version upload ?

Re: RFS: plastex

2007-07-20 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Carl Fürstenberg wrote: On 7/20/07, Bernd Zeimetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: how do you mean by provide a way to repackage the upstream tarball? http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch-best-pkging-practices.en.html#s-bpp-origtargz I would need some help interpret that.

Re: RFS: plastex

2007-07-20 Thread Carl Fürstenberg
On 7/20/07, Bernd Zeimetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Probably reading the New Maintainer's reference and the other documents linked on http://www.debian.org/doc/devel-manuals#maint-guide could be useful for you. Best regards, Bernd Zeimetz Hehe, have read that million of times :) I mostly

Re: Nagios version

2007-07-20 Thread The Fungi
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 05:23:20PM +0200, David Dumortier wrote: [...] But I'm a bit confused about the version of the Debian package. Is there a licence problem about the version upload ? [...] so I might help for a new release more recent of nagios. [...] What version are you looking for?

RFS: NMU for gidentd

2007-07-20 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Hi, Could some one review and upload my NMU for gidentd. Packages available at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gidentd/gidentd_0.4.5+dfsg1-0.1.dsc Regards Laurent Bigonville pgpw7awovT3Mb.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: plastex

2007-07-20 Thread Carl Fürstenberg
Have updated the package now, and I think it's only the licensing issue still in need of taking care about. See: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-plastex/ /Carl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[uploaded] RFS: dot2tex (updated package)

2007-07-20 Thread Alexander Schmehl
Hi! * Peter Collingbourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070717 18:40]: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.5.0-1 [..] I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Uploaded. Minor remark: in debian/copyright you have Debian packaging is (C) 2006. Obviously you did something in

Re: Nagios version

2007-07-20 Thread Christoph Haas
David, please use your real email address. workaround.org is a domain hosted by myself and I'm pretty positive I didn't give you a freedotfr hostname in that domain. Christoph -- Peer review means that you can feel better because someone else missed the problem, too. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Package removals: when are Documents removed:?

2007-07-20 Thread Robert James Clay
All, When are 'documents' removed during the removal or purge of a package? I am working on re-packaging Fidogate (dropped from Debian after sarge) the following errors come up during a package removal or purge in a test install (under Etch): Removing fidogate ... Document

Re: Nagios version

2007-07-20 Thread Magnus Holmgren
On Friday 20 July 2007 22:53, Christoph Haas wrote: David, please use your real email address. workaround.org is a domain hosted by myself and I'm pretty positive I didn't give you a freedotfr hostname in that domain. Dudu obviously sent a mail with an unqualified address in the From: field,

to use upstream scons or not

2007-07-20 Thread Carl Fürstenberg
When you have a upstream package that are using scons, is there a good way to incorperate that into a debian package, or should a new build script be written? I was mostly thinking about http://www.imagemagick.org/download/python/ as it's script is rather platform-specific. /Carl -- To

Re: RFS: hfsprogs - mkfs and fsck for HFS and HFS+ file systems

2007-07-20 Thread Paul Wise
On 7/20/07, Rogério Brito [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is quite nice that you have shown some interest in hfsprogs. I will explain what you have asked. I don't really have any interest in them (don't interact with Macs at the moment), my motivation for the question was to perhaps get those

Re: Auto-building many manpages: redundant work for the buildds ?

2007-07-20 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 03:05:45PM +0200, Daniel Leidert a écrit : This would violate the Debian Policy section 12.1, reading [..] Each program, utility, and function should have an associated manual page included in the same package. [..]. Hi Daniel, Since it is not a MUST, but just a