Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: steam-powered
Version : 6
Upstream Author : Michael Gilbert
* URL : no website
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: shell
Description : Valve's steam game content
Michael Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The users *are* free to choose the software that's out there. The
Debian project is also free to refuse to choose what software it
distributes.
the key word is distribution. the question is whether the part of
the software to be added to the
Hello,
On Mon, 03 Sep 2007, Joachim Reichel wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7.7-2
of my package normalize-audio.
I haven't checked this in detail but a quick look shows additional
build-dependencies:
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5), dpatch, autotools-dev,
2007/9/3, Ben Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Michael Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The users *are* free to choose the software that's out there. The
Debian project is also free to refuse to choose what software it
distributes.
the key word is distribution. the question is whether
Piklab is an integrated development environment for applications based on
Microchip PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers similar to the MPLAB environment.
Support for several compiler and assembler toolchains is integrated. The
GPSim simulator, the ICD1 programmer, the ICD2 debugger, the PICkit1 and
Hello ,..
i wish to create a debian package for SMSer by guySoft i didn't found an
itp for it but maybe someone is working and didn't send one ;-)
--
--
Could you at least use man ?
Jabka Atu (aka mha13/Mashrom Head)
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Monday 03 September 2007 11:29:17 Miriam Ruiz wrote:
I for one would prefer not to concentrate too much in adding that kind of
software to Debian, and even less in trying to promote it if there's no
real demand for it beforehand.
Very well said, Miriam. There are similar issues with other
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package xpn.
* Package name: xpn
Version : 0.7.0-3
Upstream Author : Antonio Caputo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://xpn.altervista.org/index-en.html
* License : GPLv2
Section : net
It builds these
Hi,
Michael Krauss wrote:
- dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xpn/xpn_0.7.0-3.dsc
IANADD, therefore i cannot upload you package, but anyways some comments:
Major problems:
* xpn appears to be the first package you release, therefore it must not
have a debian revision higher
Hi,
Major problems:
* xpn appears to be the first package you release, therefore it must not
have a debian revision higher then -1. This has an affect on
debian/changelog which should only contain one version.
I don't remember that there was a consensus about whether unreleased versions
On Mon, 03 Sep 2007, Jan C. Nordholz wrote:
* xpn appears to be the first package you release, therefore it must not
have a debian revision higher then -1. This has an affect on
debian/changelog which should only contain one version.
I don't remember that there was a consensus about
Jan C. Nordholz wrote:
I don't remember that there was a consensus about whether unreleased versions
should be kept in the changelog (link appreciated if someone knows better).
This will depend on the sponsor's preference, and thus I wouldn't consider it
a major problem (but IANADD either).
Hello mentors!
I have a new ccontrol package ready for upload. Once again it is a minor
change from the last version:
* Force-disable GCC stack protection as it is incompatible with the
current dietlibc (Ubuntu #109157).
* Don't ignore errors in $(MAKE) distclean.
The first change will
Hi all!
I have develop program (http://qstardict.ylsoftware.com) and maintain
Debian package for them. Now I want to put them to Debian. Can anyone to
be my advocate?
--
Alexander Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Hi,
* Alexander Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-09-03 16:18]:
I have develop program (http://qstardict.ylsoftware.com) and maintain
Debian package for them. Now I want to put them to Debian. Can anyone to
be my advocate?
You don't need an advocate if you don't want to become an
official Debian
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 06:15:24PM +0400, Alexander Rodin wrote:
Hi all!
I have develop program (http://qstardict.ylsoftware.com) and maintain
Debian package for them. Now I want to put them to Debian. Can anyone to
be my advocate?
Hi Alexander,
Where are the debian sources?
Justin
--
To
В Пнд, 03/09/2007 в 16:29 +0200, Nico Golde пишет:
Hi,
* Alexander Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-09-03 16:18]:
I have develop program (http://qstardict.ylsoftware.com) and maintain
Debian package for them. Now I want to put them to Debian. Can anyone to
be my advocate?
You don't need an
В Пнд, 03/09/2007 в 10:19 -0400, Justin Pryzby пишет:
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 06:15:24PM +0400, Alexander Rodin wrote:
Hi all!
I have develop program (http://qstardict.ylsoftware.com) and maintain
Debian package for them. Now I want to put them to Debian. Can anyone to
be my advocate?
Hi
Am Montag, den 03.09.2007, 14:50 +0200 schrieb Norbert Preining:
On Mon, 03 Sep 2007, Jan C. Nordholz wrote:
* xpn appears to be the first package you release, therefore it must not
have a debian revision higher then -1. This has an affect on
debian/changelog which should only contain
Hi,
Hmm. Well i have no link, cause i don't know that there has been any
different opinions on this. It might not be a technical problem, but as
the changelog is part of what the users _can_ see it might not be a good
idea to publish something thats not available to anyone, but the
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 07:12:18PM +0400, Alexander Rodin wrote:
В Пнд, 03/09/2007 в 10:19 -0400, Justin Pryzby пишет:
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 06:15:24PM +0400, Alexander Rodin wrote:
Hi all!
I have develop program (http://qstardict.ylsoftware.com) and maintain
Debian package for them.
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7.7-2
of my package normalize-audio.
I haven't checked this in detail but a quick look shows additional
build-dependencies:
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5), dpatch, autotools-dev,
libaudiofile-dev, libmad0-dev, mpg321,
Hi Kevin,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7.7-2
of my package normalize-audio.
I haven't checked this in detail but a quick look shows additional
build-dependencies:
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5), dpatch, autotools-dev,
libaudiofile-dev, libmad0-dev, mpg321,
Hi,
Kapil Hari Paranjape [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Jörg Sommer wrote:
Do *not* get the upstream .tar.gz which may have changed for some
mysterious reason.
I don't think the upstream tar.gz have changed, but your orig.tar.gz is
not the same as the upstream tar.gz. This
Thank you!
You're the upstream author; why don't you include the manpage upstream
instead of in the .diff.gz? I realize that manpages for graphical
programs are difficult to write well. Does your program accept
keystrokes? Does it have any other help file?
I don't include manpage into
On Mon, 03 Sep 2007 21:55:07 +0400
Alexander Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're the upstream author; why don't you include the manpage upstream
instead of in the .diff.gz? I realize that manpages for graphical
programs are difficult to write well. Does your program accept
keystrokes?
Am Mon, 03 Sep 2007 17:39:54 +0200 schrieb Daniel Leidert:
Am Montag, den 03.09.2007, 14:50 +0200 schrieb Norbert Preining:
On Mon, 03 Sep 2007, Jan C. Nordholz wrote:
* xpn appears to be the first package you release, therefore it
must not have a debian revision higher then -1. This
Hi,
Am Mon, 03 Sep 2007 14:27:40 +0200 schrieb schoenfeld / in-medias-res:
Major problems:
* xpn appears to be the first package you release, therefore it must
not have a debian revision higher then -1. This has an affect on
debian/changelog which should only contain one version.
there seem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jan C. Nordholz wrote:
Why should I try to hide the normal course of development? I don't see
I agree that this *is* suboptimal. But it should not be part of normal
development cycle to create extra revisions that you do not release,
should it?
This sub-thread is discussing whether we *want* software in Debian
whose only purpose is to sell non-free software.
like i said before, the purpose of the package is to help the average
user to easily run the software of their choice on linux. steam does
include a store, but it is by no means
Hi,
Are you sure, that the executable bit isn't set?
Here i get the following:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l /usr/share/xpn/xpn.sh
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 559 2007-09-03 20:41 /usr/share/xpn/xpn.sh
What looks like i expected. And the program is executable.
] dpkg-deb -c xpn_*deb
[...]
I for one would prefer not to concentrate too much in adding that
kind of software to Debian, and even less in trying to promote it
if there's no real demand for it beforehand.
there is demand. 90% of computer users play games, and steam has a
lot of users (3 million players per month [1]).
homebank was the subject of an RFS some time ago and had problems with
non-GPL licenced SVG images (which, I admit, I completely missed).
These were fixed and I uploaded a new upstream version provided by the
maintainer but it was rejected because there is no source for the HTML
documentation.
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 12:09:41AM +0200, Joachim Reichel wrote..
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7.7-2
of my package normalize-audio.
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/normalize-audio/normalize-audio_0.7.7-2.dsc
You need to complete the debian/copyright a
Michael Krauss wrote:
Are you sure, that the executable bit isn't set?
Yes.
Here i get the following:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l /usr/share/xpn/xpn.sh
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 559 2007-09-03 20:41 /usr/share/xpn/xpn.sh
That is why you should use something like pbuilder etc. to test your
Am Montag, den 03.09.2007, 20:59 +0200 schrieb Michael Krauss:
Am Mon, 03 Sep 2007 17:39:54 +0200 schrieb Daniel Leidert:
Am Montag, den 03.09.2007, 14:50 +0200 schrieb Norbert Preining:
[..]
I guess it shouldn't be a problem to start real Debian life with a
revision higher than -1, but
Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
These were fixed and I uploaded a new upstream version provided by the
maintainer but it was rejected because there is no source for the HTML
documentation.
rejected, the source of doc/*.html is missing. If you look into the
files you see a
Hi Patrick,
Well you are right in this point. But I seem to develope my packages in
another way then you. Cause i only start a new changelog entry, if i
really uploaded something through my sponsor to the archive.
I usually do it that way, too. But there are cases when I have to create
2007/8/9, Krzysztof Burghardt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2007/7/28, Krzysztof Burghardt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0cvs20070728-1
of my package libsbc.
It builds these binary packages:
libsbc-dev - Development files for subband codec (SBC) library
Le Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 03:17:18PM +0100, David C Tarrant a écrit :
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package eprints.
Making Research Freely Available - For many years we have been helping
researchers and their institutions to provide free online access to their
research
40 matches
Mail list logo
