Russ Allbery wrote:
Kevin Coyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
what is LP: #96014?
LP numbers are usually Launchpad bugs (in Ubuntu's system).
Yes, that's it. That issue has been initially reported in Ubuntu (see
https://launchpad.net/bugs/96014 for the details). Since it affects
Debian
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 09:40:25AM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
Your package is very good. Thanks for your work. Just one nit. Please
put the javadocs and examples into an extra -doc package. I think the
size of them warrents an extra package. And please make the normal
package suggest the -doc
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 03:46:18PM -0400, Michael Casadevall wrote:
Dear mentors,
Hi Michael!
- dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cvsps/cvsps_2.1-4.dsc
09:45:27 ERROR 404: Not Found.
So hmm, yes, please fix that or check it next time before you submit the
mail. ;) Please also
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 09:40:25AM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
Your package is very good. Thanks for your work. Just one nit. Please
put the javadocs and examples into an extra -doc package. I think the
size of them warrents an extra package. And please make the normal
package
On Thu, September 6, 2007 09:48, Mario Iseli wrote:
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/cvsps/cvsps_2.1-4.dsc
09:45:27 ERROR 404: Not Found.
Sorry, I already uploaded this after an IRC conversation on
#debian-mentors, I didn't realise that there was also a mailinglist mail
Dear mentors,
there has been some discussion going some time ago on about making the
copyright file machine-interpretable. I really like the idea and read
the proposal [1]. The new format looks clearer to me and I wonder
whether it's reasonable to already use it.
There don't seem to be any tools
El lun, 03-09-2007 a las 11:45 +0200, Miriam Ruiz escribió:
Piklab is an integrated development environment for applications based
on
Microchip PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers similar to the MPLAB
environment.
Support for several compiler and assembler toolchains is integrated.
The
GPSim
2007/9/6, José L. Redrejo Rodríguez [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
El lun, 03-09-2007 a las 11:45 +0200, Miriam Ruiz escribió:
Piklab is an integrated development environment for applications based
on
Microchip PIC and dsPIC microcontrollers similar to the MPLAB
environment.
Support for several
On Thu, September 6, 2007 13:58, Manuel Prinz wrote:
There don't seem to be any tools using it right now, and it's not
policy. On the other hand, I really don't see any reason not to use it,
knowing that some adjustments have to be made if the format changes. What
are your thoughts on that? Is
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 01:58:31PM +0200, Manuel Prinz wrote:
Dear mentors,
there has been some discussion going some time ago on about making the
copyright file machine-interpretable. I really like the idea and read
the proposal [1]. The new format looks clearer to me and I wonder
whether
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 10:57:55AM -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 09:29:45AM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Dear Debian Mentors,
I have a specific question with regard to -dbg packages for
libraries. My understanding of generating -dbg libraries is like this:
1. We
Le 5 sept. 07 à 22:22, Justin Pryzby a écrit :
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 09:58:32PM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
[...]
I also wonder how to fix this issue best: I guess /etc/yorick
files should
belong in the package yorick, not yorick-data, but can I
simply switch
the files from one
Le 5 sept. 07 à 23:54, Neil Williams a écrit :
On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 21:58:32 +0200
Thibaut Paumard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear mentors,
I'm maintaining the yorick-* packages. The source package is split
into yorick, yorick-data and yorick-dev.
Is yorick-doc not useful in that list? It's
Le 5 sept. 07 à 23:54, Neil Williams a écrit :
On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 21:58:32 +0200
Thibaut Paumard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear mentors,
I'm maintaining the yorick-* packages. The source package is split
into yorick, yorick-data and yorick-dev.
Is yorick-doc not useful in that list? It's
2007/9/1, Jeffrey Ratcliffe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tesseract
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- dget
2007/9/6, DS [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
1. There is no second revision. Are you sure that you uploaded it?
2. Package tesseract-ocr depends on tesseract-ocr-eng but there is no
section for this one in debian/control.
Oh! Sorry! 2 is found. But what about 1?
--
wbr
Denis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On 06/09/07, DS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. There is no second revision. Are you sure that you uploaded it?
It was requested that I put all changes from -2 in -1, as -1 was never released.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Koch wrote:
On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 01:47:43PM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
(CC'ed to Debian Mentors).
Dear Mentors,
Myself and a friend have managed to package libj2ssh-java.
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.1.13+svn.20070906.r740-1
of my package museek+.
It builds these binary packages:
mucous - Python/curses client for museekd
murmur - PyGTK2 client for Museekd, the P2P Soulseek Daemon
museekd- Client for the SoulSeek peer
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package piwva.
* Package name: piwva
Version : 1.0.1-6
Upstream Author : Thomas Karlsson
* URL : http://space.eu.org/thka/piwva/
* License : GPL
Section : mail
It builds these binary packages:
piwva
* -fPIC is only used when building the .so file but not when compiling
the source files (is it ok this way?)
No, it is not ok that way. Follow this link. It also answers your
question regarding -fPIC and static linking (short answer, also not ok):
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 10:15:28AM -0700, Brandon wrote:
I'm not sure how to actually handle replacing the files. Is it ok to
put them into the orig.tar.gz? I'm sure the answer is in the policy
manual somewhere.
The orig.tar.gz can't have any files introduced relative to upstream.
* lintian
Thanks for taking a look at my package.
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 13:03 +1000, Paul Wise wrote:
Firstly, please make a non-native package (diff.gz and orig.tar.gz
instead of just a tar.gz).
Done.
Please file an intent to package bug and close it in the changelog:
Michael Levin wrote:
Accidentally filed two (#441087, #441088) but the changelog closes both
of them.
You know, that bugs can be merged?
Regards,
Patrick
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Michael!
On 9/6/07, Michael Levin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've reuploaded the package with these changes.
You are using a different source code than the original one (md5sum of them):
abfc4789241a09b14a99f27f7d5c5566 cellwriter-1.0.0.tar.gz
d1dad3e165314efe605469e015548820
Hi!
On 9/6/07, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.1.13+svn.20070906.r740-1
of my package museek+.
Uploaded.
Thank you!
Best regards,
Nelson
for the new version 0.1.13+svn.20070906.r740-1
of my package museek+.
Uploaded.
Thank you!
Best regards,
Nelson
cleaning scripts will detect it doesn't provide any binary package
anymore, right ?
Nelson A. de Oliveira a écrit :
Hi!
On 9/6/07, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.1.13+svn.20070906.r740-1
of my package museek+.
Uploaded
Hello Kevin,
thank you for your suggestions. I uploaded a new package which should cover
them.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/drpython
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main
contrib
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 07:14:16AM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
Can you provide any generic guidelines on how large the docs should be to
warrant a separate -doc package? This comes up from time to time
sponsoring, and for new packages I've seen packages rejected because the
- -doc
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.32.dfsg-1
of my package warsow and also for the new version 0.32-1 of the
warsow-data package.
The warsow package builds these packages:
warsow - A comic-style fast-paced 3D ego-shooter
warsow-server - Server for the Warsow 3D
Hi Lukáš
I am looking for a sponsor for package python-unac (ITP -
http://bugs.debian.org/440511). It's a simple CDBS-based Python
package, I think the packaging is clean enough.
this module wasn't updated in upstream's SVN since 21 months, is it
still developed? Will you be able to play
* DS [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-09-05 19:50:52 +0600]:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package qstardict.
* Package name: qstardict
Version : 0.07-1
Upstream Author : Alexander Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://qstardict.ylsoftware.com
*
2007/9/7, Oleksandr Moskalenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm looking it over for an upload. However, I can't download any of the
dictionaries linked from the upstream main page - sourceforge pops up error
pages saying they are not available - do you have any dictionaries I could use
for testing your
Michael Levin [EMAIL PROTECTED] (06/09/2007):
You know, that bugs can be merged?
I got an email from BTS saying the two reports were merged by someone
already. However, they both still show up in the bugs list and I'm not
sure which bug number they were merged into so I'm leaving the
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 20:29 +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
Michael Levin wrote:
Accidentally filed two (#441087, #441088) but the changelog closes
both
of them.
You know, that bugs can be merged?
I got an email from BTS saying the two reports were merged by someone
already. However,
36 matches
Mail list logo
