Hi,
My previous sponsor is not answering emails, so I'd appreciate if a DD could
sponsor the upload of esmtp (user configurable relay-only MTA):
Name: esmtp
Version:0.6.0-1
Uploaded: 2007-09-03 17:27:01
Description:esmtp - User configurable relay-only MTA
Debian-mentors
best x x x for free
7forfree dot cn
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, varun_shrivastava wrote:
i have made a package which is a simple gtk application.
it depends on gtk-directfb-2.0.so.0 ,
i included this library in the depends field in control file.
Please ask on debian-mentors, it's made for people who learn packaging.
after creating
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 01:00:02AM +0200, Krzysztof Burghardt wrote:
However, I noticed the previous two uploads have been signed by
different DDs. Quite often people sponsoring a package will also sponsor
further updates, so you won't need to ask again for a new sponsor. I
take it they
2007/9/26, Krzysztof Burghardt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2007/9/23, Florian Ernst [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
However, I noticed the previous two uploads have been signed by
different DDs. Quite often people sponsoring a package will also sponsor
further updates, so you won't need to ask again for a new
thanks for the reply
i want to add some information that i m using a cross compilation tool
scratchbox
All the source code i have installed in scratchbox is using make install
(not from the deb packages)
So if i want to convert an application to deb package, first i need to
convert all other
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 02:38:27 -0700 (PDT)
varun_shrivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanks for the reply
i want to add some information that i m using a cross compilation tool
scratchbox
All the source code i have installed in scratchbox is using make install
(not from the deb packages)
So
Dear mentors,
I maintain Yorick, an interpreted language specialized in numerical
problems, with a very attractive C-like syntax and nice graphical
output capabilities.
I will send a few RFC/RFSs as answers to this message for 4 source
packages. They are very similar so each other.
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package yorick-gl.
* Package name: yorick-gl
Version : 1.1+cvs20070922-1
Upstream Authors: Steven Langer and David H. Munro
* URL : http://yorick.sf.net
* License : BSD
Section : math
It builds these
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package yorick-z.
* Package name: yorick-z
Version : 1.2-1
Upstream Author : David H. Munro
* URL : http://yorick.sf.net
* License : BSD
Section : math
It builds these binary packages:
yorick-z -
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package yorick-mpeg.
* Package name: yorick-mpeg
Version : 1.0-1
Upstream Author : David H. Munro
* URL : http://yorick.sf.net
* License : BSD
Section : math
It builds these binary packages:
Sorry for the bad title on the first instance of this message
Le 26 sept. 07 à 16:01, Thibaut Paumard a écrit :
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package yorick-mpeg.
* Package name: yorick-mpeg
Version : 1.0-1
Upstream Author : David H. Munro
* URL :
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 6.2.1-1
of my package yorick-yeti.
It builds these binary packages:
yorick-yeti - utility plugin for the Yorick language
yorick-yeti-fftw - FFT plugin for the Yorick language
yorick-yeti-gsl - GSL special functions plugin for the
Hi,
please could someone review and upload vim-syntax-gtk
vim-syntax-gtk (20070925-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release
- Fix debian/vim-syntax-gtk.yaml and debian/c.vim
-- Laurent Bigonville [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:36:14 +0200
Hello.
I'm considering applying for maintainer of a couple packages, and I
wondered if Debian had some policy on preferring professional or
personal email addresses for maintainers.
I must admin I haven't read all the documentation yet... but it was not
obvious from what I read so far.
Thanks
Olivier Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (26/09/2007):
I'm considering applying for maintainer of a couple packages, and I
wondered if Debian had some policy on preferring professional or
personal email addresses for maintainers.
No policy about this point that I know of.
I must admin I haven't read
Le mercredi 26 septembre 2007 à 20:09 +0200, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
Olivier Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (26/09/2007):
I'm considering applying for maintainer of a couple packages, and I
wondered if Debian had some policy on preferring professional or
personal email addresses for
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 20:03:44 +0200
Olivier Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
I'm considering applying for maintainer of a couple packages, and I
wondered if Debian had some policy on preferring professional or
personal email addresses for maintainers.
Only if there is any copyright
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 08:03:44PM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
I'm considering applying for maintainer of a couple packages, and I
wondered if Debian had some policy on preferring professional or
personal email addresses for maintainers.
In Debian, we do things Right(tm). :-) That includes
On 09/26/2007 01:03 PM, Olivier Berger wrote:
I wondered if Debian had some policy on preferring professional or
personal email addresses for maintainers.
If you are considering long-term support for your packages, I would
suggest using an email address would provide you long-term access,
Olivier Berger wrote:
Hello.
I'm considering applying for maintainer of a couple packages, and I
wondered if Debian had some policy on preferring professional or
personal email addresses for maintainers.
I must admin I haven't read all the documentation yet... but it was not
obvious from
21 matches
Mail list logo
