Hi!
I am polishing the packages for omegat (#448867) and
libhtmlparser-java (#448872) and I have a few questions. The
background is that I already have to repackage upstream tarball,
because they contain compiled jars.
1) Should I convert eol markers (fromdos)? Or at least should I fix
the half
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 09:10:11AM -0200, Tiago Saboga wrote:
I am polishing the packages for omegat (#448867) and
libhtmlparser-java (#448872) and I have a few questions. The
background is that I already have to repackage upstream tarball,
because they contain compiled jars.
1) Should I
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 03:24:40PM +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote:
I don't know much about java, but if those are just compilations of
things for which the source is also in the tarball, there is no need to
repackage. You can remove them in the clean target in debian/rules, for
example, to make sure
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 08:22:06PM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 03:24:40PM +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote:
I don't know much about java, but if those are just compilations of
things for which the source is also in the tarball, there is no need to
repackage. You can remove
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 09:10:11AM -0200, Tiago Saboga wrote:
The background is that I already have to repackage upstream tarball,
because they contain compiled jars.
I don't know much about java, but if those are just compilations of
things for which the source is also in the tarball, there is
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 03:59:44PM +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 08:22:06PM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 03:24:40PM +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote:
I wouldn't do that. Repackaging is done to make the tarball complient
with our standards, not to
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 03:24:40PM +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 09:10:11AM -0200, Tiago Saboga wrote:
The background is that I already have to repackage upstream tarball,
because they contain compiled jars.
I don't know much about java, but if those are just
Package: debhelper
Version: 5.0.42
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
File: /usr/bin/dh_fixperms
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertag: dh_fixperms
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 04:16:06PM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
Bernd == Bernd Zeimetz
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 10:09:59AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
Making changes to make the build work is always good, of course.
However, when changes are made for the Debian package, this should be
done in a way which doesn't hide them. When a user sees a package where
the tarball is
Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
Bernd == Bernd Zeimetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
Bernd if I understand dh_fixperms manpage correctly it does not
Bernd 'fix' the permissions for bin directories anymore. So you
Bernd just want to add a chmod 755 somewhere.
However,
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 03:59:44PM +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote:
Making changes to make the build work is always good, of course.
However, when changes are made for the Debian package, this should be
done in a way which doesn't hide them. When a user sees a package where
the tarball is repackaged
Bernd == Bernd Zeimetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
Bernd if I understand dh_fixperms manpage correctly it does not
Bernd 'fix' the permissions for bin directories anymore. So you
Bernd just want to add a chmod 755 somewhere.
However, dh_fixperms seems to fix the
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package mediatomb.
* Package name: mediatomb
Version : 0.10.0-4
Upstream Author : Gena Batyan [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Sergey Bostandzhyan [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Leonhard Wimmer
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 09:35:05AM +0930, Paul Wise wrote:
postinst should use dpkg-statoverride instead of chown
Really? I thought this was an administrator's tool, and the postinst
should do something like
getent $u /dev/null ||
adduser --system --group --home /var/... --shell
On Nov 9, 2007 9:43 AM, Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 09:35:05AM +0930, Paul Wise wrote:
postinst should use dpkg-statoverride instead of chown
Really? I thought this was an administrator's tool, and the postinst
should do something like
I guess I meant
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 10:35:00AM +0930, Paul Wise wrote:
On Nov 9, 2007 9:43 AM, Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 09:35:05AM +0930, Paul Wise wrote:
postinst should use dpkg-statoverride instead of chown
Really? I thought this was an administrator's tool,
ftp-master is down, so here is a review of your diff.gz:
since you already use the Homepage field, you should remove it from
the descriptions
don't forget to send the desktop file upstream (and other relevant stuff)
the Encoding field is obsolete in .desktop files (please use lintian next time)
17 matches
Mail list logo
