On Nov 26, 2007 4:36 PM, Thomas Goirand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suspect (didn't check) that you are missing some copyright info
since there are lots of upstream authors, but only one copyright
holder.
Yes, my copyright file was really wrong, and the package was rejected by
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 17:44 +0930, Paul Wise wrote:
I'd suggest that the copyright file
should be redone and done so it can be parsed automatically:
http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat
Hi Paul,
As far as I know, it has not yet been decided that the debian/copyright
files must
[I'm on the list no need to CC me]
On Nov 28, 2007 6:15 PM, Bart Martens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as I know, it has not yet been decided that the debian/copyright
files must be formatted as described on the wiki page quoted above. Or
did I miss some decision ?
You didn't miss
Great. I was hoping for this answer :)
On Nov 26, 2007 5:25 PM, Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 25/11/2007, C.J. Adams-Collier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is there something like a service-common package that provides a helper
script like the following for services to source?
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 17:44 +0930, Paul Wise wrote:
I'd suggest that the copyright file
should be redone and done so it can be parsed automatically:
http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 18:21 +0930, Paul Wise wrote:
On Nov 28, 2007 6:15 PM, Bart Martens
Hallo C.J.,
C.J. Adams-Collier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 12:32 +, Jörg Sommer wrote:
C.J. Adams-Collier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# Fully qualified paths to required programs
START_STOP_DAEMON=/sbin/start-stop-daemon
CAT=/bin/cat
ECHO=/bin/echo
Why not use
Paul Wise wrote:
On Nov 26, 2007 4:36 PM, Thomas Goirand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suspect (didn't check) that you are missing some copyright info
since there are lots of upstream authors, but only one copyright
holder.
Yes, my copyright file was really wrong, and the package was rejected
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 10:27:21AM +0100, Bart Martens wrote:
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 17:44 +0930, Paul Wise wrote:
I'd suggest that the copyright file
should be redone and done so it can be parsed automatically:
http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at
Bart Martens wrote:
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 17:44 +0930, Paul Wise wrote:
I'd suggest that the copyright file
should be redone and done so it can be parsed automatically:
http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat
Hi Paul,
As far as I know, it has not yet been decided that the
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 07:45:07PM +, Joey Hess wrote:
Bart Martens wrote:
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 17:44 +0930, Paul Wise wrote:
I'd suggest that the copyright file
should be redone and done so it can be parsed automatically:
http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat
On Wednesday 28 November 2007 00:28:08 Paul Wise wrote:
I don't have the hardware or kernel module packaging experience, but
here are a couple of things:
Homepage is a field in the source package:
http://wiki.debian.org/HomepageFieldHOWTO
OK, I've updated the control file. The Homepage
On Nov 28, 2007 8:28 PM, Bas Wijnen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMO there's nothing wrong with suggesting to do things in a certain way,
even if there is no consensus about that (yet). Perhaps this suggestion
looked a bit too much like this is how it should be done and not
enough like you could
Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bart Martens wrote:
As far as I know, it has not yet been decided that the
debian/copyright files must be formatted as described on the wiki
page quoted above. Or did I miss some decision ?
Don't confuse it being mandatory with it being allowed. The
13 matches
Mail list logo
