On Sun, Feb 17, 2008, Colin Watson wrote:
This isn't true if you just let the patch be applied by dpkg-source -x,
since the timestamp-handling bug I mentioned earlier was fixed. It might
be true if you use a less capable patching system. ;-)
Eh you and me know I was referring to dpatch,
Hi,
I'm trying to make a deb of kernel patch tuxonice[1], an alternative way
to suspend-to-disk and suspend-to-ram.
In which section should this package go? admin? devel?
What is tuxonice:
TuxOnIce is most easily described as the Linux equivalent of Windows'
hibernate functionality. It saves the
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 12:30:32AM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 17.02.2008, 23:58 +0100 schrieb Bas Wijnen:
[..]
The get-orig-source target specifies that it must work from anywhere.
Where do you read this? The policy says, that it [..] may be invoked in
any directory
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 5.1-1
of my package libapache-mod-layout.
It builds these binary packages:
libapache2-mod-layout - Apache web page content wrapper
mod_layout allows you to create a single look and feel throughout a
website without using server side
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
I'm very sorry for my delay, but... I forgot to subscribe the mailing
list! You replied only there and I didn't noticed anything... Nice
start, isn't it? :/
Anyway, thank you so much for your precious hints, I will do my best.
But some doubt are
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 11:55:03PM +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 09:29:59PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 08:08:47PM +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote:
OTOH if the standard Debian build process jumps through unusual hoops
like forcing regeneration of all the
Hi!
* Barry deFreese [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080218 02:44]:
It includes a new upstream (fixes an RC bug)
Would have been nice to mention which bug ;)
and some significant re-packaging. It is also complaining about a
large /usr/share, so I'm wondering if it should be split into a -data
Hi Joel,
IANADD, anyways here are some comments about your sponsoring request
that might be useful.
First of all:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 01:04:48AM -0300, Joel Franco wrote:
It builds these binary packages:
nettee - a network tee program
It would be a good idea to include a long
Hello,
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Mattia Oss wrote:
I'm trying to make a deb of kernel patch tuxonice[1], an alternative way
to suspend-to-disk and suspend-to-ram.
In which section should this package go? admin? devel?
At first glance this is likely to be more than one package. There is
the
* Ansgar Burchardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080218 01:41]:
I'm looking for a sponsor for the new upstream version of whichwayisup.
It builds these binary packages:
whichwayisup - 2D platform game with a slight rotational twist
That's a nice one :) Uploaded.
Yours sincerely,
Alexander
On Feb 6, 2008 9:48 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 6, 2008 9:23 PM, Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not so sure if this is OK, what do the texlive Debian people say?
The change in the postinst looks fairly simple, perhaps it could be
integrated into
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:42:32 +0530
Kapil Hari Paranjape [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At first glance this is likely to be more than one package. There is
the kernel-patch which would be in devel, the hibernate script which
would be in admin and the user-interface which could be in utils.
I'm
Alexander Schmehl wrote:
Hi!
* Barry deFreese [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080218 02:44]:
It includes a new upstream (fixes an RC bug)
Would have been nice to mention which bug ;)
Sorry, will do, next time.
and some significant re-packaging. It is also complaining about a
large
Hello,
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Mattia Oss wrote:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:42:32 +0530
Kapil Hari Paranjape [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At first glance this is likely to be more than one package. There is
the kernel-patch which would be in devel, the hibernate script which
would be in admin and
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:53:02 +0530
Kapil Hari Paranjape [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Mattia Oss wrote:
So it should be devel, right?
Right. I think the remaining linux-patch-* packages are in devel
too!
This is what I thought! But when I searched in the debian
Hello,
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Mattia Oss wrote:
This is what I thought! But when I searched in the debian archive I
found:
linux-patch-aufs: Section: misc
linux-patch-bootsplash: Section: graphics
linux-patch-debian-2.6.24:Section: devel
linux-patch-debianlogo:
Hi!
* Barry deFreese [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080218 15:17]:
[ license.tcl ]
Oh, you remove it in debian/rules? Any reason for that?
Gah, that's new. I ripped it out because lintian was complaining that
it was an extra license file.
Ah, makes sense to remove it then, but a lintian override
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 12:47:41PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 11:55:03PM +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 09:29:59PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
If you're willing to do things by forcing a particular version in the
general case then this sounds more like
I've been told that the policy for the get-orig-source target states that
it ...fetches the most recent version of the original source package
However, I've seen others using the get-orig-source target to regenerate the
orig tarball for their packages at a particular version. I've been
Am Montag, den 18.02.2008, 11:54 -0500 schrieb Andres Mejia:
I've been told that the policy for the get-orig-source target states that
it ...fetches the most recent version of the original source package
However, I've seen others using the get-orig-source target to regenerate the
orig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package xiterm+thai.
* Package name: xiterm+thai
Version : 1.07-1
Upstream Author : Vuthichai Ampornaramveth [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Theppitak Karoonboonyanan [EMAIL
Hi David,
2008/2/17, David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Can't we propose him to upload it to experimental? That wouldn't hurt
unstable
(thus also testing -- and stable) users, but we could still have
Code::Blocks
inside Debian repositories.
As he told me, he doesn't believe on 2.8 version
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 08:08:47PM +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote:
Let's compare it with a Java program. Would you consider it acceptable
for the packager to build it, uuencode it, put it in the diff.gz and
from debian/rules just uudecode it, instead of regenerating it?
Well, I see one big
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 05:03:24PM +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 12:47:41PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 11:55:03PM +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote:
No, I don't want to force a version, I want the package to force it.
By forcing a version I mean doing so in
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my updated package tcpser.
* Package name: tcpser
Version : 1.0rc12-1
Upstream Author : Jim Brain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.jbrain.com/pub/linux/serial
* License : GPL
Section : net
It builds
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.5.11-1
of my package plywood.
It builds these binary packages:
plywood- Playwriting typing and typesetting help
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 213112, 446178
The package can be found
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package vagalume.
* Package name: vagalume
Version : 0.5.1-2
Upstream Author : Alberto Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : https://garage.maemo.org/projects/vagalume
* License : GNU GPLv3
Section : sound
On Feb 18, 2008 9:28 PM, Patrick Schoenfeld
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/nettee/nettee_0.1.8-3.dsc
Some additional comments:
Now to your package:
- debian/changelog
s/rewrited/rewritten/
- debian/copyright
Please move Copyright (C)
Hi,
Could someone please review/upload the following:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libauthen-smb-perl/libauthen-smb-perl_0.91-3.1.dsc
Should close #432809 though I'm not sure it is the best/full solution.
Description: SMB authentication module for Perl
This package supplies a
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package xiterm+thai.
* Package name: xiterm+thai
Version : 1.07-1
Upstream Author : Vuthichai Ampornaramveth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Theppitak Karoonboonyanan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
Hi!
* Andres Mejia [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080218 17:54]:
I've been told that the policy for the get-orig-source target states that
it ...fetches the most recent version of the original source package
However, I've seen others using the get-orig-source target to regenerate the
orig tarball
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package ksocrat (ITA, see bug #321596).
* Package name: ksocrat
Version : 3.2.1-3
Upstream Author : Zavolzhsky Alexandr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://ksocrat.linux.kiev.ua/
* License : GPLv2 or later
Section
On Tuesday 19 February 2008 12:21:09 am Alexander Schmehl wrote:
Hi!
* Andres Mejia [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080218 17:54]:
I've been told that the policy for the get-orig-source target states that
it ...fetches the most recent version of the original source
package However, I've seen
Andres Mejia [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What I would like to know is, what was the original purpose for the
get-orig-source target. Maybe that would clear up what the
get-orig-source target is supposed to do.
It's been in Policy from before upgrading-checklist was started and
there's no
34 matches
Mail list logo
