Re: Re: RFS: bluemindo

2008-08-07 Thread Thibaut GIRKA
You seem to be missing Ľubomír Remák from src/plugins/gajim/__init__.py Correction: you are misspelling his/her name. Huh, I copied his nick, not his name, sorry. Best regards, Thibaut GIRKA. signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée

RFS: teseq

2008-08-07 Thread Ryan Niebur
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package teseq. * Package name: teseq Version : 1.0.0-1 Upstream Author : Micah Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] * URL : http://www.gnu.org/software/teseq/ * License : GPLv3+ Section : devel It builds these

Re: Same file in two packages

2008-08-07 Thread Robert Collins
On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 03:27 +0200, Noel David Torres Taño wrote: Dear mentors: File /usr/share/icons/wmaker-GNUstep.xpm from package wmaker-data I've recently adopted and file /usr/share/WindowMaker/Icons/GNUstep.xpm from package wmaker are exactly the same, bit by bit. Since wmaker

Re: RFS: trac (updated package)

2008-08-07 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Hi Luis, [...] (trac uploaded to mentors) It seems that trac is team-maintained, and some members of the team are indeed DDs. So, why don't these sponsor the upload? I'd offer to take a look at the package and sponsor the upload if it looks alright, but just don't want to interfere with the

Re: Same file in two packages

2008-08-07 Thread Noel David Torres Taño
El Thursday 07 August 2008 09:26:44 Robert Collins escribió: On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 03:27 +0200, Noel David Torres Taño wrote: Dear mentors: File /usr/share/icons/wmaker-GNUstep.xpm from package wmaker-data I've recently adopted and file /usr/share/WindowMaker/Icons/GNUstep.xpm from

RFS: secpanel (2nd attempt - updated package - ITA )

2008-08-07 Thread Giuseppe Iuculano
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:0.5.4-1 of my package secpanel. It builds these binary packages: secpanel - graphical user interface for SSH and SCP The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 175738, 289151, 305134, 305135, 317063

Preferred way to do a chown on package's dirs ?

2008-08-07 Thread Olivier Berger
Hi. I'm not sure I can find authoritative information on how a packager should change the ownership (chown) of a shipped directory. Of course this can be done in the package's postinst. May it also be done in the debian/rules ? For instance something like : install: build dh_testdir

Re: Preferred way to do a chown on package's dirs ?

2008-08-07 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 03:12:42PM +0200, Olivier Berger a écrit : Hi. I'm not sure I can find authoritative information on how a packager should change the ownership (chown) of a shipped directory. Of course this can be done in the package's postinst. It may actually have to, if there is

Re: Preferred way to do a chown on package's dirs ?

2008-08-07 Thread Dmitry E. Oboukhov
OB I'm not sure I can find authoritative information on how a packager OB should change the ownership (chown) of a shipped directory. OB Of course this can be done in the package's postinst. OB May it also be done in the debian/rules ? OB For instance something like : OB install: build OB

Re: Re: RFS: bluemindo

2008-08-07 Thread Paul Wise
Uploaded, thanks for your contribution :) For the next upstream version, there appear to be several typos in the manual page, including a couple in the command-line options. In addition, the lauch script appears to contain no bashisms, so it should use /bin/sh instead of /bin/bash, please get

Re: Re: RFS: bluemindo

2008-08-07 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 11:40 AM, Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Uploaded, thanks for your contribution :) Forgot to say: for future uploads, please contact this list and I'll upload if I have time, or someone else will. Hopefully Patrick will soon be a DD so he can do the same. -- bye,