Hi
Dne Thu, 27 Nov 2008 23:22:51 -0800
Ryan Niebur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a):
> I'm intending on getting it into Lenny, so only minimal changes. It
> fixes an RC bug (#471121) and I am adopting the package.
>
> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
> - URL: http://mentors.debian.ne
Hi
Most of things were already answered in Matthews reply, I only react on
missing things.
Dne Thu, 27 Nov 2008 22:14:56 +0100
Laurent Guignard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napsal(a):
> > - debian/rules:
> >
> > - rm -f can not fail, so you can strip some useless test commands
> > - "test ! -f Makefile
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.17.0+20061110-3
of my package "xli".
It builds these binary packages:
xli- command line tool for viewing images in X11
The upload would fix these bugs: 431760, 471121
I'm intending on getting it into Lenny, so only minimal c
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kde-style-skulpture/kde-style-skulpture_0.2.0-1.dsc
> I'm not a KDE persion, but why do you embed parts of CDBS/debhelper in
> the source package?
The reason for this is so
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Richard Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/k/kde-style-skulpture/kde-style-skulpture_0.2.0-1.dsc
I'm not a KDE persion, but why do you embed parts of CDBS/debhelper in
the source package?
Please also add ${misc:Dep
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kde-style-skulpture".
* Package name: kde-style-skulpture
Version : 0.2.0-1
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site]
* License : [fill in]
Secti
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "l7-protocols".
* Package name: l7-protocols
Version : 20081123-1
Upstream Author : M. Strait <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, E. Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://l7-filter.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPLv2
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "l7-filter-userspace".
* Package name: l7-filter-userspace
Version : 0.10-1
Upstream Author : Ethan Sommer, Matthew Strait
* URL : http://l7-filter.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPLv2+
Section : net
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 10:14:56PM +0100, Laurent Guignard wrote:
> Michal ??iha?? a écrit :
> > Hi
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > Quick look at the package:
> >
> > - any reason why it is Architecture: i386?
>
>
> In reason of the libraries dependency.
> libnet1 package is for i386 architecture and dh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I just upload on mentors.debian.net a new version of the package with
several update according to previous comments. You could find below my
answers/explanation for each comment.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- - URL: http://men
On Tuesday 25 November 2008 19:21:46 Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 7:18 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Do you think it is severe enough to be put forward for lenny?
>
> I'm not sure. The patch looks straight-forward enough, so perhaps the
> release team would
> No, it's not normal: if that files was removed in clean target, then
> it would never have come out in .diff.gz; moreover, config.log is not
> removed in clean, but in build-stamp target.
My bad; I'll fix it in next package.
Thanks for the upload!
>
> --
> Sandro Tosi (aka morph, Morpheus, m
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 20:07, Jonathan Wiltshire
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> there is a config.log file left in diff.gz, please remove it in the
>> next upload (probably before the 'rm' in config), but apart from that
>> the package looks fine so I uploaded it.
>
> I spotted that in lintian, but
> there is a config.log file left in diff.gz, please remove it in the
> next upload (probably before the 'rm' in config), but apart from that
> the package looks fine so I uploaded it.
I spotted that in lintian, but as far as I could find out it's normal
if the file gets removed in the clean targe
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 17:53, Jonathan Wiltshire
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 04:59:56PM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> mh, distclean is not a target of debian/rules; what I suggest is using
>> something like
>>
>> clean: clean-patched unpatch
>> clean-patched: patch-stamp
>>
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jigzo".
* Package name: jigzo
Version : 0.6.1-1
Upstream Author : Elías Alejandro Año Mendoza
* URL : http://www.resorama.com/jigzo
* License : GPL-v2
Section : games
It builds these binary packages
Hi Jordi
Not a DD myself, so probably a good idea to count on Rafael for sponsoring.
I originally made the changes to the package including the icons.tar.uu, so
just thought I might help out if it was a problem regarding that.
Cheers,
Andreas
--
,-¤. Kubuntu Linux
¤; http://www.kubuntu.o
2008/11/27 Andreas Wenning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Your lintian error points out that the file src/.pc/.version is modified
> (actually created) in the diff.gz . The .pc/.version dir is most likely
> created
> by an editor on another program while changing the package; you should simply
> get rid o
Hi Jordi
Your lintian error points out that the file src/.pc/.version is modified
(actually created) in the diff.gz . The .pc/.version dir is most likely created
by an editor on another program while changing the package; you should simply
get rid of that file and re-pack.
Cheers,
Andreas
--
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - you can remove 'A ' from short description, since it has to be a
> "noun phrase".
> - you should add a debian/README.source to inform that this package
> uses quilt as patch system.
>
> Apart from those simple points (y
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 04:59:56PM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> When you upload a package to ftp-master, there are 2 possibilities,
> it's ACCEPTED (hence included in the debian archive) or it's REJECTED.
> In the latter case, you can reupload the same revision, since from
> archice POV that revisio
Hello Andrew,
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 15:27, Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9-1
> of my package "parcellite".
- you can remove 'A ' from short description, since it has to be a
"noun phrase".
- you should add a debian/README.
Hello Jonathan,
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 21:22, Jonathan Wiltshire
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Sandro
>
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 05:33:57PM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> ehm, I personally like to have all the changes in the revision =
>> "current revision in debian"+1, so -6, and you have the o
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9-1
of my package "parcellite".
It's a new upstream release with only trivial changes
in the debian/
It builds these binary packages:
parcellite - A lightweight GTK+ clipboard manager
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The pa
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3-1
of my package "grub-choose-default".
It builds these binary packages:
grub-choose-default - Control Grub Default through a GUI
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http:
I just tried to package a new upstream release of QtOctave. It seems
that I made a Lintian mistake, and I'm not sure how to fix it. I think
the problem is that somehow icons.tar ended up in the toplevel dir,
but I don't know how they got there. I might have a mistake in one of
the CMakeLists.txt fi
"Gudjon I. Gudjonsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anyway, even if the licenses aren't long it would be easier if they
> were standardised with well documented relations to the other
> licenses. A single word may change the meaning of the license and it
> is difficult to know the consequenses.
>
27 matches
Mail list logo
