Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package python-dmidecode.
Package name : python-dmidecode
Version : 2.10-1
Upstream Author : Nima Talebi
URL : http://projects.autonomy.net.au/dmidecode/
License : GNU GPL v3
Section : python
It builds 1 binary package:
python-dmidecode - Python
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 08:47:25 +0100
Salvatore Bonaccorso salvatore.bonacco...@gmail.com wrote:
Note, I'm only correcting the reply from Salvatore - I have no
intention of helping with the package any further or of offering any
sponsorship.
http://people.debian.org/~codehelp/#lang
I noticed that
Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org (19/12/2008):
I'm only mentioning this as a caution - I don't consider it a
practical problem for these particular changes to these particular
packages. Once Lenny is released and we migrate both tslib and the
xorg driver into unstable and thence into testing,
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 9:37 PM, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote:
Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org (19/12/2008):
- Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, ${xserver:Depends}
+ Depends: libts-0.0-0 (= 1.0-5), ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends},
${xserver:Depends}
That's ugly. Use
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 23:32:15 +0900
Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 9:37 PM, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org
wrote:
Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org (19/12/2008):
- Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, ${xserver:Depends}
+ Depends: libts-0.0-0 (= 1.0-5),
As I have never requested removal of an package I'm asking here for
some opinions to make sure my thoughts are reasonable. Any comments are
welcome!
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Some Data:
* Popcon inst: 359
* Open Bugs: 6 =3D normal
* Last upstream release: May 2005
* priority: optional
* Section:
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 20:59:33 +0100
Christoph Egger christoph.eg...@gmx.de wrote:
As I have never requested removal of an package I'm asking here for
some opinions to make sure my thoughts are reasonable. Any comments
are welcome!
Some Data:
* Popcon inst: 359
* Open Bugs: 6 = normal
As I have never requested removal of an package I'm asking here for
some opinions to make sure my thoughts are reasonable. Any comments are
welcome!
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Some Data:
* Popcon inst: 359
* Open Bugs: 6 =3D normal
* Last upstream release: May 2005
* priority: optional
* Section:
Hi!
Thanks for your reply.
Neil Williams schrieb:
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 20:59:33 +0100
Christoph Egger christoph.eg...@gmx.de wrote:
As I have never requested removal of an package I'm asking here for
some opinions to make sure my thoughts are reasonable. Any comments
are welcome!
Christoph Egger christoph.eg...@gmx.de (21/12/2008):
Jup I know the procedure, I was more in trouble wether it is
reasonable. There is no need I guess to have this done for lenny.
You can propose/ask for opinion on debian...@.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hello,
I've just uploaded the latest version (0.2.4) of php-nexista, a sponsor
would be great! Any feedback would be appreciated as well.
This packaging was done with dh-make-php, which is a terrific tool. I
originally made a pear package, so making a debian package was a piece of
cake.
Thanks
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 05:42:52PM -0500, Albert Lash wrote:
I've just uploaded the latest version (0.2.4) of php-nexista, a sponsor
would be great! Any feedback would be appreciated as well.
How about a link to the dsc?
This packaging was done with dh-make-php, which is a terrific tool. I
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 05:42:52PM -0500, Albert Lash wrote:
I've just uploaded the latest version (0.2.4) of php-nexista, a sponsor
would be great! Any feedback would be appreciated as well.
IANADD and can't upload for you, but I can give you some feedback to get
it into shape for a sponsor.
Dear mentors,
I am still seeking a sponsor for backintime, but in the meantime I have
also updated to the new upstream version. You can find the new dsc at
[1], all the other details are as in my original mail.
Thanks in advance.
[1]
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:0.4.2-1.1
of my package ming.
It builds these binary packages:
libming-dev - Library to generate SWF (Flash) Files (development files)
libming-util - Library to generate SWF (Flash) Files - Utilities
libming1 - Library to generate
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Balázs Hámorszky bal...@gmail.com wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:0.4.2-1.1
of my package ming.
Did you try to contact the maintainer before preparing this NMU?
You didn't document any of the debian/ changes in the debian/changelog
16 matches
Mail list logo