Re: best practice for updating inetd.conf with a user-chosen port?

2009-03-11 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Eric Cooper e...@cmu.edu writes: What is the best way to register a daemon under inetd with a user-chosen port? (I am packaging a daemon that is run by inetd, but does not have a standard port number.) Currently I am prompting the user for the port via debconf, grepping /etc/inetd.conf to

RFS: redmine

2009-03-11 Thread Jérémy Lal
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package redmine. * Package name: redmine Version : 0.9.0-1 Upstream Author : Jean-Philippe Lang jp_l...@nospam@yahoo.fr * URL : http://www.redmine.org * License : GPL-2 Section : web It builds these

Re: RFS: redmine

2009-03-11 Thread Ryan Niebur
Hi Jérémy, Rather than installing vendor/plugins, all of the plugins should be packaged. Gunnar Wolf did will_paginate, you can look at that for an example. Also in debian/copyright, what does License: none mean? Does that mean that it can't be distributed? It needs a license.. There's also

Re: RFS: redmine

2009-03-11 Thread Jérémy Lal
On 11/03/2009 15:54, Ryan Niebur wrote: Hi Jérémy, Rather than installing vendor/plugins, all of the plugins should be packaged. Gunnar Wolf did will_paginate, you can look at that for an example. ok, i'm going to have a look Also in debian/copyright, what does License: none mean? Does

Re: RFS: redmine

2009-03-11 Thread Ryan Niebur
also, shouldn't Richard be mentioned as a copyright holder for the debian packaging? It looks like you based your package off of his.. -- _ Ryan Niebur ryanrya...@gmail.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: nedit (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi It has been a month since my last mail. Although the files at mentors seem to attract reasonable traffic, I have not heard back from anybody. Would somebody be interested in commenting on my work (target experimental) on packaging a release candidate of nedit (lesstif2 based text editor) which

Re: best practice for updating inetd.conf with a user-chosen port?

2009-03-11 Thread Giacomo A. Catenazzi
Eric Cooper e...@cmu.edu writes: What is the best way to register a daemon under inetd with a user-chosen port? (I am packaging a daemon that is run by inetd, but does not have a standard port number.) Currently I am prompting the user for the port via debconf, grepping /etc/inetd.conf to

Re: RFS: nedit (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread Tony Mancill
Hi Paul, I must have missed your previous email. I'm a long-time nedit user, and so am happy to see it continue to be supported. Give me a little time to get a few other things taken care of on my side and I'll review it and prepare an upload. Thank you, Tony On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 16:45

RFS: lynkeos.app (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread Yavor Doganov
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2-4 of my package lynkeos.app. It builds these binary packages: lynkeos.app - Tool to process planetary astronomical images for GNUstep The package appears to be lintian clean. (Actually, there are two linitan warnings --

Re: RFS: lynkeos.app (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread Barry deFreese
Yavor Doganov wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2-4 of my package lynkeos.app. It builds these binary packages: lynkeos.app - Tool to process planetary astronomical images for GNUstep The package appears to be lintian clean. (Actually, there are two

debian/rules

2009-03-11 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
Hello, I just going through New Maintainers' Guide and editing debian/rules file. In NMG is sentence: If your package is an `Architecture: all' one, you need to include all the commands for building the package under the `binary-indep' rule, and leave the `binary-arch' rule empty instead.

RFS: tmux (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread Karl Ferdinand Ebert
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7-1 of my package tmux. It builds these binary packages: tmux - terminal multiplexer The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL:

Re: RFS: tmux (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread René Mayorga
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 08:35:38PM +0100, Karl Ferdinand Ebert wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7-1 of my package tmux. Maybe I'm missing something but AFAICS your package was never been uploaded before, and you are missing the ITP number in you

Re: RFS: tmux (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread Karl Ferdinand Ebert
Hi, Am Wednesday 11 March 2009 21:09:43 schrieb René Mayorga: On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 08:35:38PM +0100, Karl Ferdinand Ebert wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7-1 of my package tmux. Maybe I'm missing something but AFAICS your package was never been

Re: debian/rules

2009-03-11 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
That is the correct approach, as far as I know. Be aware that you should remove the commented dh_* commands prior to attempting to upload the package or getting a sponsor, see the minor issues section of http://ftp-master.debian.org/REJECT-FAQ.html Thanks for advice and link it can really

Re: best practice for updating inetd.conf with a user-chosen port?

2009-03-11 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Giacomo A. Catenazzi [Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:56:20 +0100]: how to had new services in /etc/services database? By filing a bug like #353835 (against netbase). -- - Are you sure we're good? - Always. -- Rory and Lorelai -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

RFS: libmx4j-java (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread Damien Raude-Morvan
Hi Varun, On Tuesday 10 March 2009 23:30:20 Varun Hiremath wrote: Hi Damien, On Tue, 10 Mar, 2009 at 12:13:49AM +0100, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.0.2-5 of package libmx4j-java : Looks good. Uploaded. It's time for my

Re: RFS: nbc

2009-03-11 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Hi Sebastian, Would you mind explaining why lazarus-ide is required to build this package? I'd strongly dislike installing all kinds of X libraries to build a package that is completely unrelated to X/GTK. Thanks, Michael Hi Michael, I also strongly dislike to install all

Re: RFS: tmux (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread Ben Finney
Karl Ferdinand Ebert ferdi1...@gmx.de writes: Am Wednesday 11 March 2009 21:09:43 schrieb René Mayorga: Maybe I'm missing something but AFAICS your package was never been uploaded before, and you are missing the ITP number in you changelog entry for the first release, it is only state

Re: RFS: tmux (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread Karl Ferdinand Ebert
Am Wednesday 11 March 2009 23:23:39 schrieb Ben Finney: Karl Ferdinand Ebert ferdi1...@gmx.de writes: Am Wednesday 11 March 2009 21:09:43 schrieb René Mayorga: Maybe I'm missing something but AFAICS your package was never been uploaded before, and you are missing the ITP number in you

dpkg-buildpackage -S error

2009-03-11 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
Hello, having this error running sudo dpkg-buildpackage -S debian/rules clean dh_testdir dh_testroot rm -f build-stamp configure-stamp # Add here commands to clean up after the build process. /usr/bin/make PREFIX = /usr clean make: *** empty variable name. Stop. make: [clean] Error 2 (ignored)

RFS: clewn

2009-03-11 Thread Remy Dautriche
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package clewn. * Package name: clewn Version : 1.14-1 Upstream Author : xdeg...@users.sourceforge.net * URL : http://clewn.sourceforge.net * License : GPLv2 Section : devel It builds these binary

Re: RFS: libmx4j-java (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread Varun Hiremath
Hi Damien, On Wed, 11 Mar, 2009 at 10:45:30PM +0100, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: Hi Varun, On Tuesday 10 March 2009 23:30:20 Varun Hiremath wrote: Hi Damien, On Tue, 10 Mar, 2009 at 12:13:49AM +0100, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new

Re: RFS: tmux (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 4:35 AM, Karl Ferdinand Ebert kfeb...@gmail.com wrote: tmux       - terminal multiplexer This sounds very much like 'screen', what advantages does it have over 'screen'? -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: RFS: tmux (updated package)

2009-03-11 Thread Kapil Hari Paranjape
Hello, On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Paul Wise wrote: This sounds very much like 'screen', what advantages does it have over 'screen'? Just quoting from the FAQ: * How is tmux different from GNU screen? What else does it offer? tmux offers several advantages over screen: - a

Re: debian/rules

2009-03-11 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 09:50:01PM +0100, Jaromír Mikeš a écrit : build-stamp: configure-stamp $(MAKE) -C source/ PREFIX=/usr clean: -$(MAKE) -C source/ PREFIX=/usr clean install: build $(MAKE) -C source/ PREFIX=/usr DESTDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian/jkmeter install Dear

Re: RFS: redmine

2009-03-11 Thread Albert Lash
I'm not a DD but I've been quite interested in trying out redmine. Thanks for packaging it! Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package redmine. * Package name: redmine Version : 0.9.0-1 Upstream Author : Jean-Philippe Lang jp_l...@nospam@yahoo.fr * URL