Paul Wise p...@debian.org writes:
Seems obvious to me that it is asking you to update the debian
copyright file only.
That will satisfy Lintian, yes, but only because Lintian can't
reasonably test whether the upstream license grant matches what's in
the ‘debian/copyright’.
Common sense seems
Le Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 05:37:08PM +1100, Ben Finney a écrit :
If we distribute a package with ‘debian/copyright’ so that it
deliberately differs from upstream in this regard, are we not
violating policy §12.5 “Every package must be accompanied by a
verbatim copy of its copyright and
Od: Siegfried-Angel Gevatter Pujals (RainCT) sgevat...@ubuntu.cat
Well, I guess you're missing Section: in debian/control.
Exactly .. ;) thank you ... fixed
regards
mira
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.7-1
of my package php-geoip.
It builds these binary packages:
php5-geoip - GeoIP module for php5
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL:
Ben Finney wrote:
If we distribute a package with ‘debian/copyright’ so that it
deliberately differs from upstream in this regard, are we not
violating policy §12.5 “Every package must be accompanied by a
verbatim copy of its copyright and distribution license in the file
(Now including debian-policy; this bears on how to interpret §12.5
w.r.t. changing the FSF's address in an upstream license grant.)
Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org writes:
Le Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 05:37:08PM +1100, Ben Finney a écrit :
If we distribute a package with ‘debian/copyright’ so
Hello,
I am not sure what to fill to Section in control file for my new package I am
building.
Program is small easy CLI utility generating sound (pink and white noise)
Thanks for help
mira
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au writes:
If it is not required to be verbatim in ‘debian/policy’, then why
include it at all?
On the other hand, if it *is* required to be in ‘debian/policy’
verbatim, doesn't that preclude changing what it says before upstream
makes the same change?
On dim, 15 mar 2009 13:57:40 +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
Hello,
Hello,
I am not sure what to fill to Section in control file for my new package I
am building.
Program is small easy CLI utility generating sound (pink and white noise)
Thanks for help
For me this type of software has
On 2009-03-15, Laurent Guignard lguignard.deb...@gmail.com wrote:
On dim, 15 mar 2009 13:57:40 +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
Hello,
Hello,
I am not sure what to fill to Section in control file for my new package I
am building.
Program is small easy CLI utility generating sound (pink and
* Jaromír Mikeš [Sun, 15 Mar 2009 13:57:40 +0100]:
Hello,
I am not sure what to fill to Section in control file for my new package I
am building.
Program is small easy CLI utility generating sound (pink and white noise)
Section: sound sounds appropriate to me.
--
- Are you sure we're
Od: Adeodato Simó d...@net.com.org.es
Section: sound sounds appropriate to me.
I will use sound ... thank you all.
cheers
mira
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
They aren't redmine plugins, but rails plugins that redmine requires.
okay, I'll work on those next week and next weekend.
Thanks,
Ryan
Ok, i get it.
indeed there are plugins in vendor/plugins,
but i fear that you can't really put them apart from redmine :
i asked JP Lang (upstream developer)
Dear mentors, Dear debian-science people;
I am hoping that Yaroslav Halchen will continue sponsoring this (Hi
Yaroslav!), but I made quite a few changes in this new version
including:
- soname bump
- added a symbol file
- converted packaging to topgit
- two standards
Hello,
I know that I should report a bug if I want make a new package.
I was studying Developers Reference, section 5.1 but anyway it is not clear
for me how to do it.
Can somebody help me pls?
regards
mira
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 05:48:29PM +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
Hello,
I know that I should report a bug if I want make a new package.
I was studying Developers Reference, section 5.1 but anyway it is not clear
for me how to do it.
Can somebody help me pls?
run reportbug wnpp. if
Od: Ryan Niebur ryanrya...@gmail.com
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 05:48:29PM +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
I know that I should report a bug if I want make a new package.
I was studying Developers Reference, section 5.1 but anyway it is not
clear
for me how to do it.
Can somebody help me
2009/3/16 Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@seznam.cz:
I am running ubuntu based distro reportbug wnpp not working on it can I use
ubuntu-bug?
Or some other way?
You need a Debian sid install to build and test your packages in
before uploading them to Debian, so you could use that to report the
bug.
2009/3/16 Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@seznam.cz:
I am running ubuntu based distro reportbug wnpp not working on it can I use
ubuntu-bug?
Or some other way?
reportbug --bts=debian
--
Siegfried-Angel Gevatter Pujals (RainCT)
Ubuntu Developer. Debian Contributor.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi mira
In that case you need to specify that you are reporting in the Debian BTS:
reportbug --bts debian wnpp
Cheers,
Andreas
--
,-¤. Kubuntu Linux
¤; http://www.kubuntu.org
`-¤' Linux for Human Beings
On Sunday 15 March 2009 18:12:02 Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
Od: Ryan Niebur
Od: Paul Wise p...@debian.org
You need a Debian sid install to build and test your packages in
before uploading them to Debian, so you could use that to report the
bug.
I am using pbuilder with option --distribution sid
It should be fine I hope.
mira
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sunday 15 March 2009 12:52:51 Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
Od: Paul Wise p...@debian.org
You need a Debian sid install to build and test your packages in
before uploading them to Debian, so you could use that to report the
bug.
I am using pbuilder with option --distribution sid
It should be fine I
Dear mentors and Java maintainers,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package commons-math.
* Package name: commons-math
Version : 1.2-1
Upstream Author : Apache Software Foundation
* URL : http://commons.apache.org/math/
* License : Apache 2.0
Section
Hello,
Is it allowed to edit makefile?
If not how I can patch original makefile with my patch?
cheers
mira
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 08:50:55PM +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
Hello,
Is it allowed to edit makefile?
Yes, in the manner of [1]. If you do it this way, you will see your
changes appear in the .diff.gz when you build the package.
Or, if you want to keep the source pristine, use a patch
On Sun Mar 15 20:30, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
Dear mentors and Java maintainers,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package commons-math.
Hi Damien, I'm looking at it now, I've got a couple of points,
firstly, libraries should not depend on runtimes (you depend on
openjdk-6-jre-headless |
Od: Jonathan Wiltshire deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk
Hello,
Is it allowed to edit makefile?
Yes, in the manner of [1]. If you do it this way, you will see your
changes appear in the .diff.gz when you build the package.
Or, if you want to keep the source pristine, use a patch system:
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 21:33, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@seznam.cz wrote:
Od: Jonathan Wiltshire deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk
Hello,
Is it allowed to edit makefile?
Yes, in the manner of [1]. If you do it this way, you will see your
changes appear in the .diff.gz when you build the package.
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package pidgin-osd.
* Package name: pidgin-osd
Version : 0.1.0-1
Upstream Author :Maik Broemme
* URL : https://babelize.org/pidgin-osd.php
* License : GPL3
Section : net
It builds these binary
On Sunday 15 March 2009 21:09:33 Matthew Johnson wrote:
Hi Damien, I'm looking at it now, I've got a couple of points,
Hi Matthew and thanks for taking care.
firstly, libraries should not depend on runtimes (you depend on
openjdk-6-jre-headless | java2-runtime-headless), applications using
Od: Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org
Ok this ml is for mentoring, but use google and read doc before asking
every single question you face. For the point above, see [1].
[1] http://packaging-handbook.alioth.debian.org/wiki/PatchSystems/
Sorry, and thanks for link.
regards
mira
--
To
On 02/18/09 15:25, Paul Wise wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 4:12 AM, ERSEK Laszlo la...@elte.hu wrote:
I uploaded a new build of the package:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lbzip2
Please contact this list for future versions and I will upload if I am able.
I released a new
32 matches
Mail list logo
