Dearest mentors,
Hope you all aren't to busy with the flood gates now open.
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.1-1
of my package "parcellite".
It builds these binary packages:
parcellite - lightweight GTK+ clipboard manager
The package appears to be lintian clean and successfull
On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 13:28 +0900, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Muammar El Khatib
> wrote:
>
> > Could somebody help me with this? I'll appreciate any argument and
> > thoughts from all of you.
>
> This is usually due to GTK+ and friends using Requires instead of
> Requir
On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 04:06 +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> > Od: Jonathan Wiltshire
>
> > > Can somebody publish for me list of script from successfully build
> > > library?
> > > Or rules file?
> >
> > apt-get source
>
> Thank you that helped me to learn new things.
> But unfortunately prob
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Muammar El Khatib
wrote:
> Could somebody help me with this? I'll appreciate any argument and
> thoughts from all of you.
This is usually due to GTK+ and friends using Requires instead of
Requires.private in /usr/lib/pkgconfig/*.pc:
http://bugs.debian.org/45633
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
> Upstream Author : Sage Weil
> ceph-kclient-source - source for kernel client module
Do you plan to get the kernel module merged into Linux at some point?
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 14:20 +0100, Dominik Smatana wrote:
> Hello,
>
> there are missing licenses in some source files in upstream project
> I'm packaging for Debian.
>
> There is just license in the "main" source file.
>
> Is it fine?
>
> Or should I edit these files and add missing licenses (
Sorry attachment is here ...sudo pbuilder build --buildresult /home/mira/BUILD/zc-results/
/home/mira/BUILD/zita-convolver/zita-convolver_1.0.0-1.dsc
W: /home/mira/.pbuilderrc does not exist
I: using fakeroot in build.
Current time: Thu Mar 19 03:37:28 CET 2009
pbuilder-time-stamp: 1237430248
Bu
> Od: Jonathan Wiltshire
> > Can somebody publish for me list of script from successfully build library?
> > Or rules file?
>
> apt-get source
Thank you that helped me to learn new things.
But unfortunately problem persist. Now I know that *.so* and *.h files are
definitely created in debia
Dear mentors,
I am getting this warning when I build a package which I maintain called
quickplot:
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libcairomm-1.0.so.1 could be avoided if
"debian/quickplot/usr/bin/quickplot" were not uselessly linked against it (they
use none of its symbols).
dpkg-shlibdep
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 06:20, Ben Finney wrote:
> Mauro Lizaur writes:
>
>> On Wed, 18 Mar 2009, Stefan Ott wrote:
>>
>> > It builds these binary packages:
>> > fookebox - A jukebox frontend to mpd
>>
>> I'm not a DD, but I'd recommend you to do a small change the small
>> description, just by
Ben Finney writes:
> $ cat $HOME/.pbuilder/hooks/B10_build-again
> #! /bin/sh
This program uses Bashisms, so I've changed the shebang accordingly.
> # Build the package again to test for error on double build
>
> echo "I: building the package again"
> for dir in $(ls -d /tmp/buildd/*/) ; do
>
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 12:52:27AM +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> Can somebody publish for me list of script from successfully build library?
> Or rules file?
apt-get source
--
Jonathan Wiltshire
PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3 A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
> Od: Chow Loong Jin
> I'd suggest that you attempt to build it outside the pbuilder
> environment, then look at the contents of debian/tmp. It should show you
> what files you should match. The asterisks are fine.
That is good idea thank you ...
regards
mira
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
> Od: Jonathan Wiltshire
> > My question is ... Should I try replace Asterisks by something meaningful by
> myself of should I expect this from some script?
>
> The asterisk is the wildcard character...it just matches anything that
> fits the pattern.
Then I am starting think that I miss some i
Sage Weil writes:
> Three binary packages are built:
> ceph - server daemons, utilities
> ceph-fuse - FUSE-based client
> ceph-kclient-source - source for kernel client module
The package description should conform to the guildelines in the
“best packaging practices” in the De
On Sun Mar 15 23:58, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
> On Sunday 15 March 2009 21:09:33 Matthew Johnson wrote:
> > Hi Damien, I'm looking at it now, I've got a couple of points,
Hi, sorry for the delay.
> Sounds reasonable: I've downgraded openjdk-6-jre-headless to a Suggests.
> But now, Lintian compl
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 12:21:16AM +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> My question is ... Should I try replace Asterisks by something meaningful by
> myself of should I expect this from some script?
The asterisk is the wildcard character...it just matches anything that
fits the pattern.
--
Jonathan W
On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 00:21 +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> > Od: Jaromír Mikeš
>
> > Problem is that library installing just .docs files no .so files.
> > I've checked everything many times.
>
> There are two files in debian/ mylib.install and mylib-dev.install
>
> mylib.install looks like fr
> Od: Jaromír Mikeš
> Problem is that library installing just .docs files no .so files.
> I've checked everything many times.
There are two files in debian/ mylib.install and mylib-dev.install
mylib.install looks like from template:
usr/lib/lib*.so.*
mylib-dev.install looks like from temp
Salvatore Bonaccorso writes:
> Then using --hookdir of pbuilder to pass the directory where these
> hookscripts are stored. Basically I will do in a B-hook-script the
> following, but is not yet "perfect" :(
>
> cd /tmp/buildd
> PKGNAMES=$(ls -d */)
> for PKG in $PKGNAMES; do
> if [ -d $PK
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ceph". Ceph is a distributed
file system designed for scalability, reliability, and performance. The
package is under pretty heavy development, and new versions are released
pretty frequently. I'm hoping to find a sponsor who doesn't mind
re-up
Hi Laurent
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 02:07:41PM +0100, Laurent Guignard wrote:
> On lun, 16 mar 2009 08:08:08 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > I would like to be able to build package in pbuilder chroot if
> > possible twice in a row, to test them for that. I read on several part
> > that this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi mentors
I am reading info about dbconfig comon, and trying to understand phpmyadmin and
phpwiki, that
depends on dbconfig-common, but i get confused, Maybe some of you had written a
post about making
php with dbconfig-common packages. I would be
I re-upload my package because I made a mistake concerning ITP number (519851).
I am not sure I do the right things to upload my package.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/flvtool++
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian
"Steve M. Robbins" writes:
> Hi,
>
> For package "gmp", I have two open requests to provide 64-bit versions
> of the libraries on ppc. One of the requests also asks for a 32-bit
> version on amd64.
>
> What is the best way to do this?
On amd64:
apt-get install ia32-apt-get
apt-get update
apt
> Od: Chow Loong Jin
> > dpkg-gencontrol: warning: unknown substitution variable ${shlibs:Depends}
> I think you probably need to run dh_shlibdeps in debian/rules.
Hello,
I an running dh_shlibdeps in debian/rules ...
I removed ${shlibs:Depends} from debian/control , but still not have .so fil
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 17:42 +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I build new library from source building process run with one warning
> message.
> dpkg-gencontrol: warning: unknown substitution variable ${shlibs:Depends}
> Despite of this packages are build.
> Lintian ...clean output.
> Pro
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 17:42 +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I build new library from source building process run with one warning
> message.
> dpkg-gencontrol: warning: unknown substitution variable ${shlibs:Depends}
> Despite of this packages are build.
> Lintian ...clean output.
> Pro
Hello,
I build new library from source building process run with one warning message.
dpkg-gencontrol: warning: unknown substitution variable ${shlibs:Depends}
Despite of this packages are build.
Lintian ...clean output.
Problem is that library installing just .docs files no .so files.
I've check
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 03:01:10AM +0100, ERSEK Laszlo wrote:
> Paul Wise wrote:
>
> > And now onto the package review:
> >
> > Why does your diff.gz patch the Makefile? Shouldn't you add those
> > changes to the upstream Makefile?
>
> I don't think so. As my general, hobbyist free software deve
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 01:33:44PM +0100, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
upload error:
/var/cache/pbuilder/result$ dupload -t mentors rumor_1.0.3b-1_i386.changes
dupload note: no announcement will be sent.
Checking signatures before upload...GPG signature is
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Dominik Smatana
wrote:
> Or should I edit these files and add missing licenses (copy & paste
> from "main" file)?
Please don't do this yourself!
Ask upstream to fix this and better to provide entire PACKAGE license
(It is also possible that some files can be unde
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "longomatch".
Package name: longomatch
Version : 0.12
Upstream Author : Andoni Morales Alastruey
URL : www.ylatuya.es
License : GPLv2
Section : devel
It builds these binary packages:
longomatch
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, ERSEK Laszlo wrote:
On 03/17/09 10:19, Paul Wise wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 5:55 AM, ERSEK Laszlo wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lbzip2
Uploaded.
Thanks a lot!
lacos
Sorry, I intended to post this to the list. I was constantly fighting with
Hello,
there are missing licenses in some source files in upstream project
I'm packaging for Debian.
There is just license in the "main" source file.
Is it fine?
Or should I edit these files and add missing licenses (copy & paste
from "main" file)?
Thanks for advice.
Dominik Smatana
--
To
On lun, 16 mar 2009 08:08:08 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi
>
> I would like to be able to build package in pbuilder chroot if
> possible twice in a row, to test them for that. I read on several part
> that this should easily be done with a hook scrpipt for pbuilder.
>
> See e.g. http://
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Grammostola Rosea
wrote:
> /var/cache/pbuilder/result$ dupload -t mentors rumor_1.0.3b-1_i386.changes
> dupload note: no announcement will be sent.
> Checking signatures before upload...GPG signature is missing
> dupload fatal error: Pre-upload '/usr/share/dupload/
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 01:33:44PM +0100, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
> upload error:
>
> /var/cache/pbuilder/result$ dupload -t mentors rumor_1.0.3b-1_i386.changes
> dupload note: no announcement will be sent.
> Checking signatures before upload...GPG signature is missing
> dupload fatal error: Pre-u
Hi,
I want to upload my first package:
upload error:
/var/cache/pbuilder/result$ dupload -t mentors rumor_1.0.3b-1_i386.changes
dupload note: no announcement will be sent.
Checking signatures before upload...GPG signature is missing
dupload fatal error: Pre-upload '/usr/share/dupload/gpg-check
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "confget".
* Package name: confget
Version : 1.01-1
Upstream Author : Peter Pentchev (myself)
* URL : http://devel.ringlet.net/textproc/confget/
* License : Two-clause BSD
Section : text
It bui
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.3.0-1
of my package "png-sixlegs".
It builds these binary packages:
libpng-sixlegs-java - Sixlegs Java PNG Decoder
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 464328
* upstream release 1.3.0 (closes:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Vincent MAUGE wrote:
> As it's write on the official website of flvtool++, it's write with
> performance in mind.
Seems like a useful characteristic, would you say that flvtool2 should
be removed in favour of flvtool++?
> flvtool2 doesn't have a recent version (
First thanks for your answer.
As it's write on the official website of flvtool++, it's write with
performance in mind. flvtool2 doesn't have a recent version (2007-02-13 for
the last one) whereas flvtool++ is more recent (2009-02-05). And concerning
ffmpeg, even if it is the Swiss Army Knife, I am
43 matches
Mail list logo
