On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:18:16 +0900
Junichi Uekawa dan...@netfort.gr.jp wrote:
You can read a lot of source packages which have that. They clean
files in clean: target.
Okay. I'll see more and more packages and ask you to check it,
again.
If you are going to do something nonstandard, please
Hello,
compare to last RFS, the zinnia version bump from 0.02 to 0.03.
this RFS including following 7 source packages, which provide a
handwriting recognition input method for SCIM (now it can works for
Japanese and Simplified Chinese)
zinnia: ITP#514969, online handwriting recognition system
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my packages libchamplain
and libchamplain-gtk
* Package names : libchamplain, libchamplain-gtk
Version : 0.2.9
Upstream Author : Pierre-Luc Beaudoin
* URL : http://projects.gnome.org/libchamplain
* License : LGPL 2.1
for example, libsoup-dev has /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libsoup-2.4.pc
while liburiparser-dev don't.
how come ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 13:51:51 +0200
Jérémy Lal je...@edagames.com wrote:
for example, libsoup-dev has /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libsoup-2.4.pc
while liburiparser-dev don't.
how come ?
Depends whether upstream support pkgconfig for configuration support in
builds using the library. The .pc file
Ben Finney wrote:
Grammostola Rosea rosea.grammost...@gmail.com writes:
It builds these binary packages:
rumor - Rumor is a realtime monophonic (with chords) MIDI keyboard to
Lilypond converter
Please follow the “best practices” for writing the package synopsis
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.16-1
of tomcat-native package.
It builds these binary packages:
libtcnative-1 - Tomcat native library using the apache portable runtime
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 514500, 517163,
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Ben Finney wrote:
Grammostola Rosea rosea.grammost...@gmail.com writes:
It builds these binary packages:
rumor - Rumor is a realtime monophonic (with chords) MIDI
keyboard to Lilypond converter
Please follow the “best practices” for writing the package
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 05:02, Stefan Ott ste...@ott.net wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package fookebox, a web-based mpd
frontend.
* Package name : fookebox
Version : 0.2.0-1
Upstream Author : Stefan Ott ste...@ott.net
* URL :
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
I would be glad if someone uploaded these packages for me. This
fixes #498369 and will allow eog-plugins to be packaged.
You seem to have done the WNPP stuff wrong:
Why are you hijacking this ITP without notifying the bug?
Why does
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
Why are you hijacking this ITP without notifying the bug?
Sorry, I missed that #498369 is an RFP.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Hi,
Is it more easy to use *.dsc files from packages which are already in
other distro's like Ubuntu or OpenSuse?
For example
http://packman.links2linux.de/package/jack_mixer
And how?
Or is it better to use just upstream source?
\r
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:02:15 +0200
Grammostola Rosea rosea.grammost...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it more easy to use *.dsc files from packages which are already in
other distro's like Ubuntu or OpenSuse?
An Ubuntu package might pass Debian Policy but I don't see that the
chances of an OpenSuse
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2.5-1
of my package lynis.
It builds these binary packages:
lynis - security auditing tool for Unix based systems
Lynis is an auditing tool for Unix. It scans the system
configuration and creates an overview of system
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package remuco-server.
* Package name: remuco-server
Version : 0.8.0.1-1
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site]
* License : [fill in]
Section
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package remuco-server.
* Package name: remuco-server
Version : 0.8.0.1-1
Upstream Author : Oben Sonne obenso...@googlemail.com
* URL : http://remuco.sf.net/
* License : GPL-3
Section : sound
It builds
Do you have any signs that upstream is still alive? It looks like a bit
dead project from quick look.
No, I just made this package, because of
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=469088 where this
program is taged RFP...
So I lost time?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
$ zcat /usr/share/doc/libkrb53/changelog.Debian.gz | grep 'Use set'
* Use set -e instead of #!/bin/sh -e for all maintainer scripts.
$
Why bother? What difference does it make?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Hi Paul,
Thanks for having a look at the packages :)
Why are you hijacking this ITP without notifying the bug?
Sorry, I missed that #498369 is an RFP.
It was an RFP, so I created a new ITP and then the RFP has been
changed to ITP + owner me by somebody else.
Why does your changelog close
e2xbegqsdyt21hfc e2xbegqsdyt21...@yahoo.com writes:
$ zcat /usr/share/doc/libkrb53/changelog.Debian.gz | grep 'Use set'
* Use set -e instead of #!/bin/sh -e for all maintainer scripts.
$
Why bother? What difference does it make?
set -e is always honored; -e on the #! line is only honored
Dear mentors,
I am trying build library written in Python, this library was already build
before switching from autotools to waf.
I got also old debian/rules (attachment) file which I'm trying edit for waf.
Now I am getting this for dpkg-buildpackge -S:
dh_clean
dpkg-source -b slv2-0.6.2
Le Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 06:02:15PM +0200, Grammostola Rosea a écrit :
Is it more easy to use *.dsc files from packages which are already in
other distro's like Ubuntu or OpenSuse?
For example
http://packman.links2linux.de/package/jack_mixer
Hello,
if a Debian source package already
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Grammostola Rosea
rosea.grammost...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Is it more easy to use *.dsc files from packages which are already in other
distro's like Ubuntu or OpenSuse?
OpenSUSE uses rpms, so there is no debian/ directory. If Ubuntu has
packaged the program,
2009/3/30 Francisco García wrote:
- dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lynis/lynis_1.2.5-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Uploaded, thanks for your contribution to Debian.
Please mail this list as usual for the next upload.
--
bye,
pabs
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 3:43 AM, Adam Ziaja azi...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you have any signs that upstream is still alive? It looks like a bit
dead project from quick look.
No, I just made this package, because of
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=469088 where this
program is
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@seznam.cz wrote:
dpkg-source: cannot represent change to autowaf.pyc: binary file contents
changed
...
dpkg-source: unrepresentable changes to source
...
Can somebody check this file and advise me please?
I am not familiar with
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Daniel Moerner dmoer...@gmail.com wrote:
It can be worthwhile to look at openSUSE, Gentoo, Fedora, etc.
packaging to see if there are patches upstream hasn't applied, etc.
apt-get install whohas
whohas mixer
click click click
wish for #516572 to be fixed
--
Od: Paul Wise p...@debian.org
I think it is fairly obvious that you need to remove the *.pyc file in
the debian/rules clean target.
Thank you Paul a lot it works.
Now during package build having this error:
# Add here commands to clean up after the build process.
./waf distclean
distclean
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Jaromír Mikeš mira.mi...@seznam.cz wrote:
I tried change ./configure to $(WAF) configure on line 34 in my debian/rules,
but I got same result.
debian/rules is a makefile, I suggest reading the make documentation
to figure this one out.
--
bye,
pabs
29 matches
Mail list logo
