Re: [Fwd: Re: [jack-mixer]bin/sh: no: command not found]]

2009-04-06 Thread Grammostola Rosea
Grammostola Rosea wrote: Hi, I got this reply back from upstream author. I know close to nothing about programming, so I'm looking for a bit assistance here. Thanks. \r Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [jack-mixer]bin/sh: no:

Re: RFS: screenruler (updated package) (ruby)

2009-04-06 Thread Siegfried Gevatter (RainCT)
Uhm... Yes, perhaps an epoch would be more adequate. Whoever uploads the package, feel free to change the version to 1:0.8.9.1+bzr24-1 if you prefer that (or ask me to change it). -- Siegfried-Angel Gevatter Pujals (RainCT) Ubuntu Developer. Debian Contributor. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: out of date on mips: siege (from 2.66-2)

2009-04-06 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Tristan Greaves [Sat, 04 Apr 2009 09:53:53 +0100]: Hi all, Could someone please explain the above Excuse for me? (I understand the _what_ but not the _why_ in this instance). https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=siege My package has successfully built on the other

[Fwd: Re: [jack-mixer]bin/sh: no: command not found]]

2009-04-06 Thread Grammostola Rosea
Hi, I got this reply back from upstream author. I know close to nothing about programming, so I'm looking for a bit assistance here. Thanks. \r ---BeginMessage--- Grammostola Rosea rosea.grammost...@gmail.com writes: From: Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org Subject: Re: [jack-mixer]bin/sh:

RFS: wbar (3rd try)

2009-04-06 Thread Krzysztof Burghardt
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package wbar. * Package name: wbar Version : 1.3.3+dfsg1-1 Upstream Author : Rodolfo Granata warlock...@gmail.com * URL : http://code.google.com/p/wbar/ * License : GPL Section : x11 It builds these

Re: RFS: nc6 (updated package)

2009-04-06 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Hello! Is there any reason for nc6 anymore? The default netcat has been renamed to netcat-traditional and the alternative is netcat-openbsd (which is protocol independent and thus does ipv6) It seems to me there's no need for nc6 anymore now that a proper protocol-independent version exists?

Re: RFS: kita2

2009-04-06 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2009-03-21, Hideki Yamane henr...@debian.or.jp wrote: On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 12:42:43 +0900 Junichi Uekawa dan...@netfort.gr.jp wrote: So instead of adding a package to be removed soon after it is clear of NEW, I suggest not adding it at all. So, it's been two weeks, is there a working

RFS: siege (updated package, diffs majorly slimmed down) - attempt 2

2009-04-06 Thread Tristan Greaves
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.68b7-1 of my package siege. It builds these binary packages: siege - HTTP regression testing and benchmarking utility The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL:

Re: [Fwd: Re: [jack-mixer]bin/sh: no: command not found]]

2009-04-06 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 12:09:50PM +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote: make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/jack-mixer-6' GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE= no --makefile-install-rule ./jack_mixer.schemas ^^ It's still that space right there. make is trying to call the command 'no',

fsprotect

2009-04-06 Thread Stefanos Harhalakis
Dear mentors, About 2 weeks ago I sent an RFS for a debian-native package/program called fsprotect (available in mentors). I just show that KDE 4.2 is entering unstable. Can someone please consider sponsoring fsprotect? I re-send this mail as an urgent request. Using fsprotect all of us

Re: [Fwd: Re: [jack-mixer]bin/sh: no: command not found]]

2009-04-06 Thread Grammostola Rosea
Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 12:09:50PM +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote: make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/jack-mixer-6' GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE= no --makefile-install-rule ./jack_mixer.schemas ^^ It's still that space right there. make is

Re: RFS: siege (updated package, diffs majorly slimmed down) - attempt 2

2009-04-06 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! Tristan Greaves schrieb: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.68b7-1 of my package siege. I took a quick look at your package. Some comments bellow: - You build-depend on cdbs, but you don't use it? - Your debian/rules has a lot of commented dh_foo calls which should be

Re: [Fwd: Re: [jack-mixer]bin/sh: no: command not found]]

2009-04-06 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 09:44:20PM +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote: It's still that space right there. make is trying to call the command 'no', instead of assigning the value to the variable GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE. Thanks for comments. Which file should I look at? Personally I would unpack

Re: [Fwd: Re: [jack-mixer]bin/sh: no: command not found]]

2009-04-06 Thread Grammostola Rosea
Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 09:44:20PM +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote: It's still that space right there. make is trying to call the command 'no', instead of assigning the value to the variable GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE. Thanks for comments. Which file should I

Re: [Fwd: Re: [jack-mixer]bin/sh: no: command not found]]

2009-04-06 Thread Matthias Julius
Jonathan Wiltshire deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk writes: On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 12:09:50PM +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote: make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/jack-mixer-6' GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE= no --makefile-install-rule ./jack_mixer.schemas ^^ It's still that space

Re: [Fwd: Re: [jack-mixer]bin/sh: no: command not found]]

2009-04-06 Thread Grammostola Rosea
Matthias Julius wrote: Jonathan Wiltshire deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk writes: On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 12:09:50PM +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote: make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/jack-mixer-6' GCONF_CONFIG_SOURCE= no --makefile-install-rule ./jack_mixer.schemas

problem sign .changes

2009-04-06 Thread Jaromír Mikeš
Hello mentors, how-to sign .dsc and .changes files? I tried $ debsing -sgpg file.changes and have error: secret key not available I already generated my key by $gpg --gen-key command. regards mira -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of