Re: RFS: tstat

2009-04-26 Thread Ben Finney
Eduardo Ferro efe...@alea-soluciones.com writes: I'll improve the description... I think that I wrote the bin desc and forget to wrote the corresponding desc for the libs,, Thanks, and sorry everyone for my poor English No apology necessary; thank you for your efforts writing a description

Re: RFS: fizmo (new package)

2009-04-26 Thread Christoph Ender
Hello, first of all, thanks for taking time to look into the package. I've tried to address all the issues and I think everything's fixed. There's only one exception: It sounds like having an All rights reserved in the copyright is a problem, but since this term is also present in

Re: RFS: ttf2pt1 (QA upload) (was: Re: Planning on updating some dock-apps) (fwd)

2009-04-26 Thread Rogério Brito
Ping. -- Rogério Brito : rbr...@{mackenzie,ime.usp}.br : GPG key 1024D/7C2CAEB8 http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito : http://meusite.mackenzie.com.br/rbrito Projects: algorithms.berlios.de : lame.sf.net : vrms.alioth.debian.org ---BeginMessage--- Hi, Sandro. On Apr 24 2009, Sandro Tosi wrote:

Re: RFS: fizmo (new package)

2009-04-26 Thread Patrick Matthäi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christoph Ender schrieb: Hello, Hello, first of all, thanks for taking time to look into the package. I've tried to address all the issues and I think everything's fixed. There's only one exception: It sounds like having an All rights

Re: RFS: fizmo (new package)

2009-04-26 Thread Christoph Ender
Hi, I've modified debian/rules so that config.mk doesn't have to be included in the diff any longer. Thanks a lot for reminding me about the mt19937 issue :-). I've put the copyright notice into debian/copyright. Updated files are available at: -

Re: RFS: ripit (updated package)

2009-04-26 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
* Elimar Riesebieter [090417 19:04 +0200] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.7.0~beta20090329-1 of my package ripit. Is there no one out here to upload this package? Elimar -- Never make anything simple and efficient when a way can be found to make it

Re: RFS: ripit (updated package)

2009-04-26 Thread Neil Williams
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 14:19:15 +0200 Elimar Riesebieter riese...@lxtec.de wrote: * Elimar Riesebieter [090417 19:04 +0200] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.7.0~beta20090329-1 of my package ripit. Is there no one out here to upload this package? The RFS

Re: RFS: ripit (updated package)

2009-04-26 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
* Neil Williams [090426 13:50 +0100] On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 14:19:15 +0200 Elimar Riesebieter riese...@lxtec.de wrote: * Elimar Riesebieter [090417 19:04 +0200] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.7.0~beta20090329-1 of my package ripit. Is there

Re: RFS: ripit (updated package)

2009-04-26 Thread Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
Elimar Riesebieter wrote: * Neil Williams [090426 13:50 +0100] The RFS wasn't sufficiently interesting. http://people.debian.org/~codehelp/#lang Tell sponsors why they should care about the package - your initial RFS was bare, incomplete and just plain uninteresting. Hey, my

Re: RFS: ripit (updated package)

2009-04-26 Thread Neil Williams
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 15:08:33 +0200 Elimar Riesebieter riese...@lxtec.de wrote: * Neil Williams [090426 13:50 +0100] On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 14:19:15 +0200 Elimar Riesebieter riese...@lxtec.de wrote: * Elimar Riesebieter [090417 19:04 +0200] Dear mentors, I am looking for

pbuilder --build --binary-arch invokes 'build' target

2009-04-26 Thread deb
Hi, I'm trying to address bug #521918 http://bugs.debian.org/521918. When I run pbuilder as pbuilder --build --binary-arch eprover_1.0.004-1.dsc so that it should build only the binary target, it seems to me that it still invokes the 'debian/rules build' target, instead of 'build-arch'

Re: questions regarding libmimelib1 as seperate source package

2009-04-26 Thread Jonas Meurer
On 25/04/2009 Sven Joachim wrote: On 2009-04-25 09:26 +0200, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: In 20090425001917.gb6...@resivo.wgnet.de, Jonas Meurer wrote: Ok, I see your point. I'll change the package to be non-native again. But how about all the links to upstream places that lintian expects?

Re: RFS: ripit (updated package)

2009-04-26 Thread Adeodato Simó
Neil, I am writing to let you and the list and all sponsorees who may be reading this thread know that I don’t agree with most of what you’re saying, and that I don’t like the tone in which you are writing your thoughts, and that I think you are a harmful influence regarding these matters in

Uploaded (was: RFS: ripit (updated package))

2009-04-26 Thread Adeodato Simó
+ Elimar Riesebieter (Fri, 17 Apr 2009 19:04:15 +0200): Dear mentors, Hello, Elimar. (Elimar is one of our capable ALSA maintainers, by the way.) I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.7.0~beta20090329-1 of my package ripit. It builds these binary packages: ripit -

Re: Uploaded (was: RFS: ripit (updated package))

2009-04-26 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
* Adeodato Simó [090426 17:32 +0200] + Elimar Riesebieter (Fri, 17 Apr 2009 19:04:15 +0200): Dear mentors, Hello, Elimar. (Elimar is one of our capable ALSA maintainers, by the way.) I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.7.0~beta20090329-1 of my package ripit. It

Re: About symbol versioning, soname bumps and symbols files.

2009-04-26 Thread Adeodato Simó
+ Michael Biebl (Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:40:23 +0200): [not sure if debian-mentors is the right list, but I try anyway] [I’m moving to -devel in search of a wider audience, and dropping -mentors via Bcc to avoid the crosspost. Hopefully interested -mentor readers can move to -devel without much

Re: questions regarding libmimelib1 as seperate source package

2009-04-26 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2009-04-25, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote: On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 3:02 AM, Jonas Meurer jo...@freesources.org wrote: I intend to maintain libmimelib1 as a seperate source package now that kdepim 3.5.9 has been removed from debian/unstable. What does lurker link against on other distros

Re: RFS: ripit (updated package)

2009-04-26 Thread Neil Williams
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 17:16:30 +0200 Adeodato Simó d...@net.com.org.es wrote: I am writing to let you and the list and all sponsorees who may be reading this thread know that I don’t agree with most of what you’re saying, and that I don’t like the tone in which you are writing your thoughts,

Re: RFS: fizmo (new package)

2009-04-26 Thread Patrick Matthäi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christoph Ender schrieb: I've modified debian/rules so that config.mk doesn't have to be included in the diff any longer. Thanks a lot for reminding me about the mt19937 issue :-). I've put the copyright notice into debian/copyright. Uploaded. -

Ad hominem attacks (was: Re: RFS: ripit (updated package))

2009-04-26 Thread Rogério Brito
Dear Neil, On Apr 26 2009, Neil Williams wrote: You're a tad lucky that you got a response at all, most such pings are silently ignored. Yes, that is pointing at you Rogério Brito, regarding ttf2pt1 (QA upload). Hum, my name cited here in a negative way. I didn't expect this. If an RFS

Re: Ad hominem attacks (was: Re: RFS: ripit (updated package))

2009-04-26 Thread Sandro Tosi
2009/4/26 Rogério Brito rbr...@ime.usp.br: On Apr 26 2009, Neil Williams wrote: Compounding that error with a 1 line ping is ridiculous. If a person simply asked to be ping'ed, then I don't think that the ping is ridiculous. Could you elaborate on that? Also, my descriptions of the packages

Re: RFS: ripit (updated package)

2009-04-26 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 17:16, Adeodato Simó d...@net.com.org.es wrote: Neil, I am writing to let you and the list and all sponsorees who may be reading this thread know that I don’t agree with most of what you’re saying, and that I don’t like the tone in which you are writing your thoughts,

Re: Bug#523338: ITP: radare -- Free advanced command line hexadecimal editor

2009-04-26 Thread Reinhard Tartler
AFAIUI sponsor requests should go to debian-mentors. Please not that I'm not a mentors regular, so I'm not really sure of the exact procedures here. Nevertheless, I'm copying the mailing list. Sebastian Reichel elektra...@gmail.com writes: I am searching for a sponsor, so feel free to do so ;)

Re: Ad hominem attacks (was: Re: RFS: ripit (updated package))

2009-04-26 Thread Neil Williams
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 14:29:11 -0300 Rogério Brito rbr...@ime.usp.br wrote: Dear Neil, On Apr 26 2009, Neil Williams wrote: You're a tad lucky that you got a response at all, most such pings are silently ignored. Yes, that is pointing at you Rogério Brito, regarding ttf2pt1 (QA upload).

Re: Ad hominem attacks (was: Re: RFS: ripit (updated package))

2009-04-26 Thread Neil Williams
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 19:40:57 +0200 Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org wrote: Please consider that Neil's opinion, while worth listening, DOES NOT represent the opinion of Debian as a whole. I agree - it might not sound like it sometimes, but I am just one sponsor. Your work is appreciated, as the

Re: simultaneous installation lib and lib-mpi

2009-04-26 Thread Magnus Holmgren
On torsdagen den 26 februari 2009, Gerber van der Graaf wrote: I came across this problem when packaging my own libgpiv3 / libgpiv-mpi3 (recently accepted and uploaded). These libraries are used by the other packages gpivtools / gpivtools-mpi from a single upstream source (not yet available on

Re: RFS: ripit (updated package)

2009-04-26 Thread Neil Williams
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 19:55:59 +0200 Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org wrote: I strongly think that even sponsoring a single package let the sponsoree be really happy for the work he did and was accepted as valuable. I agree too. And also the user base would be happy to see an improved package

Re: RFS: ozerocdoff

2009-04-26 Thread Julien Valroff
Le mercredi 15 avril 2009 à 18:13 +0200, Julien Valroff a écrit : Hi Rogério, Le mardi 14 avril 2009 à 21:08 -0300, Rogério Brito a écrit : Hi, Julien. I am not a DD, but I just saw your package. On Apr 14 2009, Julien Valroff wrote: * URL :

Re: RFS: smplayer (updated package)

2009-04-26 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hi Maia, On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 22:09, Maia Kozheva inetper...@gmail.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Reuploaded the package. I believe I have addressed all your concerns, except the choice dependency on mplayer | mplayer-nogui. I would rather keep that

Re: RFS: smplayer (updated package)

2009-04-26 Thread Giuseppe Iuculano
Hi Sandro, Sandro Tosi ha scritto: There's just one lintian warning you might want to address in the next release: W: smplayer: desktop-mimetype-without-update-call /usr/share/applications/smplayer.desktop W: smplayer: desktop-mimetype-without-update-call

Re: RFS: smplayer (updated package)

2009-04-26 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 21:45, Giuseppe Iuculano giuse...@iuculano.it wrote: Sandro Tosi ha scritto: There's just one lintian warning you might want to address in the next release: W: smplayer: desktop-mimetype-without-update-call /usr/share/applications/smplayer.desktop W: smplayer:

Re: RFS: smplayer-themes (updated package)

2009-04-26 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 15:42, LucidFox inetper...@gmail.com wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.1.19.dfsg-1 of my package smplayer-themes. A part from some minor things on debian/changelog (not worthing a new upload or be fixed in the next one), there is a

How to build-depend on linux-headers

2009-04-26 Thread Luca Niccoli
Dear mentors, in a package I'm preparing I need to build depend on linux headers, but if I just put linux-headers in debian/control lintian shrieks virtual-package-depends-without-real-package-depends The problem is that AFAICS all the real packages in question are either version-specific

Re: How to build-depend on linux-headers

2009-04-26 Thread Jonas Meurer
Hey, On 27/04/2009 Luca Niccoli wrote: in a package I'm preparing I need to build depend on linux headers, but if I just put linux-headers in debian/control lintian shrieks virtual-package-depends-without-real-package-depends The problem is that AFAICS all the real packages in question are

Re: How to build-depend on linux-headers

2009-04-26 Thread Luca Niccoli
2009/4/27 Jonas Meurer jo...@freesources.org: Hey, I'm not absolutely sure about it, but linux-libc-dev might be the answer to your questions. Yes! I was completely mistaken, I thought the headers I needed were in my system because I had linux-headers-whatever installed... But then do I have

RFS: shutter

2009-04-26 Thread Ryan Niebur
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package shutter. * Package name: shutter Version : 0.70.2-1 Upstream Author : Mario Kemper and Shutter Team * URL : http://shutter-project.org/ * License : GPL-3+ Section : graphics It builds these

Re: RFS: smplayer-themes (updated package)

2009-04-26 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 6:10 AM, Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org wrote: A part from some minor things on debian/changelog (not worthing a new upload or be fixed in the next one), there is a lintian tag you want to address: I: smplayer-themes source: dfsg-version-with-period 0.1.19.dfsg-1 (run

Re: RFS: ripit (updated package)

2009-04-26 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 1:05 AM, Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org wrote: Well, maybe. OTOH sometimes it is better to explain why RFS emails get ignored, otherwise the ping requests get more and more pointless. I'm hoping the debexpo codebase for mentors.d.n will help here. One of the proposed

Re: RFS: smplayer-themes (updated package)

2009-04-26 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 05:01, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote: On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 6:10 AM, Sandro Tosi mo...@debian.org wrote: A part from some minor things on debian/changelog (not worthing a new upload or be fixed in the next one), there is a lintian tag you want to address: I: