RFS: php-xml-serializer (updated package)

2009-07-11 Thread Federico Gimenez Nieto
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.20.0-1 of the package php-xml-serializer, which i intend to adopt. It builds these binary packages: php-xml-serializer - swiss-army knife for reading and writing XML files The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would

looking for sponsor for a non-free package

2009-07-11 Thread Harald Dunkel
Hi folks, To fix a FTBFS I would like to upload a new version of my game package blockade. I am not a Debian Developer, so I am looking for a sponsor. The sources are public domain except for the game scenes, so it has to go to non-free. Is this a problem? Regards Harri signature.asc

Re: looking for sponsor for a non-free package

2009-07-11 Thread Bart Martens
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 01:58:09PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: Hi folks, To fix a FTBFS I would like to upload a new version of my game package blockade. I am not a Debian Developer, so I am looking for a sponsor. The sources are public domain except for the game scenes, so it has to go

Re: looking for sponsor for a non-free package

2009-07-11 Thread Harald Dunkel
Hi Bart, Bart Martens wrote: Where is the Debian package ? The upstream sources of blockade are already in the official repository. Maybe I can mail the new diff and *.deb files to you (130 KB )? What would you suggest? I have a question, anyway: The game is supposed to build and work on

Re: looking for sponsor for a non-free package

2009-07-11 Thread Harald Dunkel
Hi Leo, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote: A Dissabte 11 Juliol 2009, Harald Dunkel va escriure: The sources are public domain except for the game scenes, so it has to go to non-free. Then has to go to contrib. Or better, two packages, one in main (the free part) and another to non-free.

Re: looking for sponsor for a non-free package

2009-07-11 Thread Leopold Palomo Avellaneda
A Dissabte 11 Juliol 2009, Harald Dunkel va escriure: Hi folks, To fix a FTBFS I would like to upload a new version of my game package blockade. I am not a Debian Developer, so I am looking for a sponsor. The sources are public domain except for the game scenes, so it has to go to

Re: looking for sponsor for a non-free package

2009-07-11 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Harald Dunkel a écrit : I have a question, anyway: The game is supposed to build and work on all platforms, but I can build it only for i386 and amd64. Are non-free packages built for the other platforms automagically? Or would you suggest to restrict the list of platforms? See:

Re: looking for sponsor for a non-free package

2009-07-11 Thread Harald Dunkel
Hi Stephane. Stéphane Glondu wrote: See: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/11/msg00012.html A very helpful link. Many thanx Harri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: parcellite (updated package)

2009-07-11 Thread Andrew SB
Hello again mentors, On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Andrew SBa.star...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, This is a ping on my RFS for parcellite (0.9.1-1) which was first posted to mentors on March 19th. I just refreshed the upload. All suggestion brought up have been added. It builds in a sid

Re: looking for sponsor for a non-free package

2009-07-11 Thread Leopold Palomo Avellaneda
A Dissabte 11 Juliol 2009, Harald Dunkel va escriure: Hi Leo, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote: A Dissabte 11 Juliol 2009, Harald Dunkel va escriure: The sources are public domain except for the game scenes, so it has to go to non-free. Then has to go to contrib. Or better, two

RFS: joystick (updated package)

2009-07-11 Thread Stephen Kitt
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 20051019-6 of my package “joystick”. It builds these binary packages: evtest - utility to monitor input device events inputattach - utility to connect serial-attached peripherals to the input subsystem joystick - set of testing

RFS: ampache (RC bug fix, updated package)

2009-07-11 Thread Charlie Smotherman
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.5.1-1 of my package ampache. It builds these binary packages: ampache- web-based audio file management system The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 526475, 526719 The package can be found on

RFS: ampache-themes (updated package)

2009-07-11 Thread Charlie Smotherman
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.4.3-1 of my package ampache-themes. It builds these binary packages: ampache-themes - Themes for Ampache The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL:

Re: looking for sponsor for a non-free package

2009-07-11 Thread Harald Dunkel
Hi all, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote: Hi Harald, so, I suppose that could be difficult to separate is as library with dynamic linking, etc I think the real problem is mixing free and non-free sources in the same *.orig.tar.gz. What would be your recommendation to handle this?