RFS: xoscope (updated package)

2009-08-09 Thread Bhavani Shankar R
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.0-1 of my package xoscope. It builds these binary packages: xoscope- digital oscilloscope The package appears to be lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 446445, 515989, 534060 The package can be found on

Re: RFS: xoscope (updated package)

2009-08-09 Thread Kartik Mistry
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Bhavani Shankar Rbh...@ubuntu.com wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.0-1 of my package xoscope. The package appears to be lintian clean. Please check it with: lintian -iIEv --pedantic It has something that you need to fix :) --

Re: RFS: yajl

2009-08-09 Thread George Danchev
On Tuesday 04 August 2009 10:50:20 pm George Danchev wrote: The package looks solid, everything is put in place and I was unable to find any flaws other than boring nitpicking: * the short description of the libyajl1-dbg should read `... - debugging symbols', instead of ` - library

Re: RFS: djmount

2009-08-09 Thread Nick Leverton
On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 08:01:28PM +0200, Dario Minnucci (midget) wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package djmount. Hi Dario, Thanks for making this package, I have previously used djmount to test libupnp. The upstream package contains private copies of libtalloc and

RFS: ognl

2009-08-09 Thread Damien Raude-Morvan
Dear friends, I am looking for a sponsor for my package ognl. * Package name: ognl Version : 2.7.3-1 Upstream Author : Drew Davidson and Luke Blanshard (Open Symphony) * URL : http://www.opensymphony.com/ognl/ * License : BSD/Apache Section : java

Re: RFS: djmount

2009-08-09 Thread Dario Minnucci (midget)
Hi Nick, Thanks for your quick answer. Nick Leverton wrote: On Sat, Aug 08, 2009 at 08:01:28PM +0200, Dario Minnucci (midget) wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package djmount. Hi Dario, Thanks for making this package, I have previously used djmount to test

Re: RFS: djmount

2009-08-09 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:31 AM, Dario Minnucci (midget)deb...@midworld.net wrote: Nick Leverton wrote: The upstream package contains private copies of libtalloc and pupnp, both of which are already included in Debian in their own right (libtalloc1 and libupnp3).  Perhaps you could consider

Re: RFS: djmount

2009-08-09 Thread Patrick Matthäi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Wise schrieb: On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:31 AM, Dario Minnucci (midget)deb...@midworld.net wrote: Nick Leverton wrote: The upstream package contains private copies of libtalloc and pupnp, both of which are already included in Debian in their

Re: RFS: libhtml-calendarmonthsimple-perl

2009-08-09 Thread Italo Valcy
Hi Ryan, Thanks for look and comment my package. Citando Ryan Niebur ryanrya...@gmail.com, em 28-07-2009: instead of linking to a screenshot in the long description, you should upload the screenshot to screenshots.debian.net (which you may have to do after it is uploaded). Done! I'm

Re: RFS: djmount

2009-08-09 Thread Nick Leverton
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 06:31:27PM +0200, Dario Minnucci (midget) wrote: I'll try to rebuild it using libs included in Debian. PS: Shall I remove from the original sources 'libupnp' and 'talloc' and rename the package to be DFSG, or it's OK to distribute upstream sources like that ? I

Re: RFS: djmount

2009-08-09 Thread Dario Minnucci (midget)
Hi again, Patrick Matthäi wrote: Paul Wise schrieb: On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:31 AM, Dario Minnucci (midget)deb...@midworld.net wrote: Nick Leverton wrote: The upstream package contains private copies of libtalloc and pupnp, both of which are already included in Debian in their own right

Re: RFS: djmount

2009-08-09 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Dario Minnucci (midget)deb...@midworld.net wrote: PS: Shall I write back to the one who answers my questions or directly back to the list, or both? http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To

Re: RFS: djmount

2009-08-09 Thread Dario Minnucci (midget)
Paul Wise wrote: On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Dario Minnucci (midget)deb...@midworld.net wrote: PS: Shall I write back to the one who answers my questions or directly back to the list, or both? http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct * When replying to messages on the

Re: RFS: djmount

2009-08-09 Thread Dario Minnucci (midget)
Nick Leverton wrote: On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 06:31:27PM +0200, Dario Minnucci (midget) wrote: I'll try to rebuild it using libs included in Debian. PS: Shall I remove from the original sources 'libupnp' and 'talloc' and rename the package to be DFSG, or it's OK to distribute upstream

Re: RFS: djmount

2009-08-09 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 08:18:27PM +0200, Patrick Matth??i wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Wise schrieb: On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 12:31 AM, Dario Minnucci (midget)deb...@midworld.net wrote: Nick Leverton wrote: The upstream package contains private copies of

Re: RFS: ognl

2009-08-09 Thread Matthew Johnson
Hi Damien, I've reviewed the package and it looks clean, but I have one question. Which bit is licenced under the apache-derived licence? I can only find BSD-licenced files. Matt -- Matthew Johnson signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: djmount

2009-08-09 Thread Patrick Matthäi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Peter Pentchev schrieb: As Paul Wise said, the removing would be a good idea if the packager is not completely certain that the upstream build system will never, ever, under any circumstances, use the bundled source even if it is told to use the

Re: RFS: ognl

2009-08-09 Thread Damien Raude-Morvan
Le dimanche 09 août 2009 22:40:30, Matthew Johnson a écrit : Hi Damien, Hi Matthew, I've reviewed the package and it looks clean, but I have one question. Which bit is licenced under the apache-derived licence? I can only find BSD-licenced files. OpenSymfony Licence (Apache derived one) is

Re: RFS: libhtml-calendarmonthsimple-perl

2009-08-09 Thread Ryan Niebur
On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 03:47:26PM -0300, Italo Valcy wrote: Hi Ryan, Thanks for look and comment my package. Citando Ryan Niebur ryanrya...@gmail.com, em 28-07-2009: instead of linking to a screenshot in the long description, you should upload the screenshot to screenshots.debian.net

Re: RFS: ognl

2009-08-09 Thread Matthew Johnson
On Sun Aug 09 23:02, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: I've reviewed the package and it looks clean, but I have one question. Which bit is licenced under the apache-derived licence? I can only find BSD-licenced files. OpenSymfony Licence (Apache derived one) is promoted by upstream as official

Re: RFS: ognl

2009-08-09 Thread Russ Allbery
Matthew Johnson mj...@debian.org writes: I don't like: * 5. Products derived from this software may not be called * OpenSymphony *or OGNL, nor may OpenSymphony or OGNL appear in their *name, without prior written permission of the OpenSymphony *Group. since we are, arguably,

Re: RFS: ognl

2009-08-09 Thread Damien Raude-Morvan
Le dimanche 09 août 2009 23:53:41, Matthew Johnson a écrit : On Sun Aug 09 23:02, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: I've reviewed the package and it looks clean, but I have one question. Which bit is licenced under the apache-derived licence? I can only find BSD-licenced files. OpenSymfony

RFS: djmount (re-uploaded)

2009-08-09 Thread Dario Minnucci (midget)
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package djmount. * Package name: djmount Version : 0.71-1 Upstream Author : Rémi Turboult r...@users.sourceforge.net * URL : http://djmount.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL-2 Section : net It builds

Re: RFS: djmount

2009-08-09 Thread Ben Finney
Dario Minnucci (midget) deb...@midworld.net writes: * When replying to messages on the mailing list, do not send a carbon copy (CC) to the original poster unless they explicitly request to be copied. I was wondering that just because when you hit 'Reply' automacally sets: To: who

Re: RFS: djmount

2009-08-09 Thread Dario Minnucci (midget)
Hi Ben, Ben Finney wrote: [...] If your mail program doesn't have such a feature, you have a couple of options: switch to a mail program that does have that feature (e.g. Kmail, Mutt, Gnus, loads of others) or manually edit the fields each time you reply to the list. You should also

Re: RFS: djmount

2009-08-09 Thread Ben Finney
Dario Minnucci (midget) deb...@midworld.net writes: A third option could be configuring the list to send back to the list on replies. :) You mean, the list should lie about the author of messages so that when you use the “reply to author” feature, it doesn't go only to the author? No, that's