Re: How to write emacs dependency ?

2009-11-12 Thread Paul Gevers
Craig Small wrote: On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 06:51:01PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: On 2009-11-11 16:43 +0100, Christoph Egger wrote: Depends: emacs21 | emacs22 | emacs23 | xemacs21, gnus | emacs22 | emacs23 | xemacs21 This does not give you any guarantee that somebody trying to run darcsum

Re: How to write emacs dependency ?

2009-11-12 Thread TANIGUCHI Takaki
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:26:35 +1100 csm...@debian.org(Craig Small) said: How about simply dropping support for emacs21? It's an obsolete Emacs flavor version that has been removed from sid already. That is possibly the better idea in that case. I choice this idea. - Craig --

Re: Building pdf from odt files noninteractively?

2009-11-12 Thread Paul Gevers
Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: Felipe Sateler wrote: I have a source package that has pdf documentation, which is generated with openoffice.org. Is it possible to generate said pdf without user interacion (that is, for autobuilding in the buildds)? Or maybe I can just ship the also-included pdf

Re: insserv: warning: current stop runlevel(s) ... overwrites defaults

2009-11-12 Thread Raphael Geissert
Michael Hanke wrote: [...] Can anyone please point me to the problem and its solution? When making changes to the runlevels either via update-rc.d or the lsb header, the init script needs to be removed first (via update-rc.d, as simply removing the symlink won't work in the case of file-rc).

Re: presumable last policy change before releasing Squeeze?

2009-11-12 Thread ERSEK Laszlo
On Sun, 4 Oct 2009, Paul Wise wrote: Write an article for debaday.debian.net about lbzip2 to promote it and get more users/testers. The DebADay Team has reviewed and published my article under [0]. Many thanks to Ana Guerrero, Martín Ferrari, and the rest of the DebADay Team! Also thank

Re: Building pdf from odt files noninteractively?

2009-11-12 Thread Eugene V. Lyubimkin
Paul Gevers wrote: Some time ago I tried unoconv for my package, but it had issues as can be seen in the bts: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=491456#102 Do you know a way to get it done? (I have to look into jodconverter). Yes, I saw this bug as well, but worked around it by

Re: insserv: warning: current stop runlevel(s) ... overwrites defaults

2009-11-12 Thread Michael Hanke
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 09:03:59AM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote: Michael Hanke wrote: [...] Can anyone please point me to the problem and its solution? When making changes to the runlevels either via update-rc.d or the lsb header, the init script needs to be removed first (via

RFS: congruity

2009-11-12 Thread Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package congruity. * Package name: congruity Version : 13+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Stephen Warren s-t-concorda...@wwwdotorg.org * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/congruity * License : GPL-3+ Section

Re: swami - libgtk1.2

2009-11-12 Thread Barry deFreese
Jaromír Mikeš wrote: Od: Paul Wise p...@debian.org Get upstream to port it to GTK+ 2.0 and ensure that it will be compatible with GTK+ 3.0 (which will remove a bunch of deprecated stuff from GTK+ 2.0). An alternative would be to send upstream a patch

Re: RFS: congruity

2009-11-12 Thread Vincent Bernat
OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du jeudi 12 novembre 2009, vers 17:28, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre mathieu...@gmail.com disait : Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package congruity. * Package name: congruity Version : 13+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Stephen Warren

Re: RFS: congruity

2009-11-12 Thread M. van Brummelen
Hi, It builds these binary packages: congruity - graphical utility to configure Logitech Harmony remotes Nice I just bought one yesterday. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/congruity - Source repository: deb-src

Re: RFS: congruity

2009-11-12 Thread Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Vincent Bernat ber...@debian.org wrote: In the first case, you should specify the license of the new one. In the second case, CC-BY-SA-2.5 does not comply with DFSG. You should also build-depends on sharutils to get uudecode. Indeed, I'm still good too fast.

RFS: php-net-ipv6

2009-11-12 Thread Bas Roos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package php-net-ipv6. * Package name: php-net-ipv6 Version : 1.1.0b2-1 Upstream Author : Alexander Merz kont...@alexander-merz.com * URL :

Re: How to write emacs dependency ?

2009-11-12 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Paul Gevers p...@climbing.nl writes: Craig Small wrote: On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 06:51:01PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: On 2009-11-11 16:43 +0100, Christoph Egger wrote: Depends: emacs21 | emacs22 | emacs23 | xemacs21, gnus | emacs22 | emacs23 | xemacs21 This does not give you any guarantee

scrollkeeper/rarian

2009-11-12 Thread Pietro Battiston
Hello, I'm trying to package some manual with a package of mine (of which I'm also upstream), and I'm having big (and unexpected) problems in installing it correctly. Basically, I have the manual files, and then the omf, which, when installed correctly, work fine. However, in the .omf file the

Lintian experimental tags (was: RFS: ampache (updated package))

2009-11-12 Thread Russ Allbery
Raphael Geissert geiss...@debian.org writes: Well, experimental checks are not to be considered irrelevant chatter, hence my question. The current experimental checks are: Tag: spelling-error-in-binary Severity: normal Certainty: wild-guess It is based on the output of strings(1) so it

Re: Lintian pickiness and packaging improvements

2009-11-12 Thread Russ Allbery
Manoj Srivastava sriva...@debian.org writes: Ah. I have a few of those. For example, take this warning from Lintian: description-synopsis-might-not-be-phrased-properly This is not policy, but dev-ref, Fixed the cross-reference, which was simply wrong. and when it was

Re: RFS: congruity

2009-11-12 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 2:00 AM, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre mathieu...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Vincent Bernat ber...@debian.org wrote: In the first case, you should specify the license of the new one. In the second case, CC-BY-SA-2.5 does not comply with DFSG. You