Craig Small wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 06:51:01PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2009-11-11 16:43 +0100, Christoph Egger wrote:
Depends: emacs21 | emacs22 | emacs23 | xemacs21,
gnus | emacs22 | emacs23 | xemacs21
This does not give you any guarantee that somebody trying to run darcsum
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:26:35 +1100
csm...@debian.org(Craig Small) said:
How about simply dropping support for emacs21? It's an obsolete Emacs
flavor version that has been removed from sid already.
That is possibly the better idea in that case.
I choice this idea.
- Craig
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
Felipe Sateler wrote:
I have a source package that has pdf documentation, which is generated
with openoffice.org. Is it possible to generate said pdf without user
interacion (that is, for autobuilding in the buildds)? Or maybe I can
just ship the also-included pdf
Michael Hanke wrote:
[...]
Can anyone please point me to the problem and its solution?
When making changes to the runlevels either via update-rc.d or the lsb
header, the init script needs to be removed first (via update-rc.d, as
simply removing the symlink won't work in the case of file-rc).
On Sun, 4 Oct 2009, Paul Wise wrote:
Write an article for debaday.debian.net about lbzip2 to promote it and
get more users/testers.
The DebADay Team has reviewed and published my article under [0].
Many thanks to Ana Guerrero, Martín Ferrari, and the rest of the DebADay
Team!
Also thank
Paul Gevers wrote:
Some time ago I tried unoconv for my package, but it had issues as can
be seen in the bts:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=491456#102
Do you know a way to get it done? (I have to look into jodconverter).
Yes, I saw this bug as well, but worked around it by
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 09:03:59AM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Michael Hanke wrote:
[...]
Can anyone please point me to the problem and its solution?
When making changes to the runlevels either via update-rc.d or the lsb
header, the init script needs to be removed first (via
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package congruity.
* Package name: congruity
Version : 13+dfsg-1
Upstream Author : Stephen Warren s-t-concorda...@wwwdotorg.org
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/congruity
* License : GPL-3+
Section
Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
Od: Paul Wise p...@debian.org
Get upstream to port it to GTK+ 2.0 and ensure that it will be
compatible with GTK+ 3.0 (which will remove a bunch of deprecated
stuff from GTK+ 2.0). An alternative would be to send upstream a patch
OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du jeudi 12 novembre 2009, vers 17:28,
Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre mathieu...@gmail.com disait :
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package congruity.
* Package name: congruity
Version : 13+dfsg-1
Upstream Author : Stephen Warren
Hi,
It builds these binary packages:
congruity - graphical utility to configure Logitech Harmony remotes
Nice I just bought one yesterday.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/congruity
- Source repository: deb-src
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Vincent Bernat ber...@debian.org wrote:
In the first case, you should specify the license of the new one. In the
second case, CC-BY-SA-2.5 does not comply with DFSG.
You should also build-depends on sharutils to get uudecode.
Indeed, I'm still good too fast.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package php-net-ipv6.
* Package name: php-net-ipv6
Version : 1.1.0b2-1
Upstream Author : Alexander Merz kont...@alexander-merz.com
* URL :
Paul Gevers p...@climbing.nl writes:
Craig Small wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 06:51:01PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2009-11-11 16:43 +0100, Christoph Egger wrote:
Depends: emacs21 | emacs22 | emacs23 | xemacs21,
gnus | emacs22 | emacs23 | xemacs21
This does not give you any guarantee
Hello,
I'm trying to package some manual with a package of mine (of which I'm
also upstream), and I'm having big (and unexpected) problems in
installing it correctly.
Basically, I have the manual files, and then the omf, which, when
installed correctly, work fine.
However, in the .omf file the
Raphael Geissert geiss...@debian.org writes:
Well, experimental checks are not to be considered irrelevant chatter,
hence my question.
The current experimental checks are:
Tag: spelling-error-in-binary
Severity: normal
Certainty: wild-guess
It is based on the output of strings(1) so it
Manoj Srivastava sriva...@debian.org writes:
Ah. I have a few of those. For example, take this warning from
Lintian: description-synopsis-might-not-be-phrased-properly
This is not policy, but dev-ref,
Fixed the cross-reference, which was simply wrong.
and when it was
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 2:00 AM, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
mathieu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Vincent Bernat ber...@debian.org wrote:
In the first case, you should specify the license of the new one. In the
second case, CC-BY-SA-2.5 does not comply with DFSG.
You
18 matches
Mail list logo