Re: RFS: libqtintf4 (ping)

2009-12-19 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2009-12-18, Matthias Klumpp matth...@nlinux.org wrote: The package is lintian-clean. There were some concerns about the build-script, but because it's a really small lib there should be no problem in building this. The way it is built, it takes around 1G of memory to build. This *needs* to

Re: Fwd: RFS: qodem

2009-12-19 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 07:32:07PM -0600, Kevin Lamonte wrote: I think this is fixed now. Should I resubmit the RFS again? Yes, I suggest you include some details of what the package does and how it would be useful in Debian, to increase your chances of attracting a sponsor. I made that

Re: RFS: libqtintf4 (ping)

2009-12-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hello again! After some work with upstream, all problems seem to be fixed now. The project contains a qmake-file, moc-files are generated automatically and buildscript fails on error. If upstream publishes the qmake-version of libqt4intf in a tarball with upstream-version in name I will fix the

Re: RFS: libqtintf4 (ping)

2009-12-19 Thread Matthias Klumpp
Hello again! After some work with upstream, all problems seem to be fixed now. The project contains a qmake-file, moc-files are generated automatically and buildscript fails on error. If upstream publishes the qmake-version of libqt4intf in a tarball with upstream-version in name I will fix the

Fuppes: Package Names and the Separation of a Project into Packages

2009-12-19 Thread Robert Massaioli
Hi mentors, Recently I have been developing on fuppes and decided to start packaging it; there was an existing but rather dead ITP for fuppes here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=426048 (Before I go on I jsut want to say that I have read the entire debian policy (and a few

Re: Fuppes: Package Names and the Separation of a Project into Packages

2009-12-19 Thread Christoph Egger
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 11:31:50PM +1100, Robert Massaioli wrote: $ ls *.deb -1 fuppes_0.654-1_i386.deb fuppes-core-plugin-presentation_0.654-1_i386.deb fuppes-database-plugin-mysql_0.654-1_i386.deb fuppes-database-plugin-sqlite3_0.654-1_i386.deb fuppes-decoder-plugin-flac_0.654-1_i386.deb

Re: RFS: dma (bugfixes, debconf, 3.0 (quilt))

2009-12-19 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 04:56:45PM +0200, George Danchev wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.2009.07.17-3 of my package dma, the DragonFly Mail Agent. This version fixes a couple of bugs, updates the debconf translations, and converts the package

RFS: mbuffer (new upstream, fix FTBFS, prefer libmhash)

2009-12-19 Thread Peter Pentchev
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 20091213-1 of my package mbuffer. In addition to the new upstream version, there's a FTBFS bug fixed, and the Debian package now properly builds against libmhash, not GnuTLS, as discussed with Mats Erik Andersson on this list and in

RFS: qodem

2009-12-19 Thread Kevin Lamonte
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package qodem. * Package name: qodem Version : 0.2.0-1 Upstream Author : Kevin Lamonte kevin.lamo...@gmail.com * URL : http://qodem.sourceforge.net * License : GPLv2+ Section : comm It builds these

Re: Fuppes: Package Names and the Separation of a Project into Packages

2009-12-19 Thread The Fungi
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 02:18:22PM +0100, Christoph Egger wrote: Hm I'd first consider the size of each of the plugin packages. If they're relatively small you could consider grouping them, seems like that it is already somewhat done in core, database, encoder, metadata, ... if these are not

Re: RFS: dma (bugfixes, debconf, 3.0 (quilt))

2009-12-19 Thread George Danchev
Peter Pentchev writes: On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 04:56:45PM +0200, George Danchev wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.0.2009.07.17-3 of my package dma, the DragonFly Mail Agent. This version fixes a couple of bugs, updates the debconf translations,