-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Dne Wed, 3 Mar 2010 09:46:35 +0100
Michal Čihař ni...@debian.org napsal(a):
http://poisson.phc.unipi.it/~mascellani/debian/freehep-xml_2.1.2+dfsg1-2.dsc
http://poisson.phc.unipi.it/~mascellani/debian/freehep-graphicsio-svg_2.1.1-1.dsc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Dne Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:01:36 +0100
Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com napsal(a):
On 03/01/2010 08:51 AM, Michal Čihař wrote:
The package is lintian clean and needs freehep-xml and
freehep-graphicsio-svg which are in NEW.
For upload
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/03/2010 09:56 AM, Michal Čihař wrote:
Okay, I'm probably doing something wrong here, but it fails to
build:
dh_testroot
You must specify a valid JAVA_HOME or JAVACMD!
make: *** [maven-sanity-check] Error 1
dpkg-buildpackage: error:
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 09:09:12PM -0600, William Vera wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.0-1
of my package recoverjpeg.
It builds these binary packages:
recoverjpeg - tool to recover JPEG images from a filesystem image
Which features does it bring compared to
Hi,
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 07:14:32 +0100
Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org wrote:
I haven't followed this very closely but is it OK to upload the fixed
package now? I can do it (I guess that the previous pointer to the
.dsc file is the right one) but prefer asking before doing it.
I've
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Simon Paillard
simon.paill...@resel.enst-bretagne.fr wrote:
I guess the homepage should be http://www.rfc1149.net/devel/recoverjpeg
instead (though it is in french only).
No it is in English ;)
http://www.rfc1149.net/language
--
Mathieu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Dne Wed, 03 Mar 2010 12:09:50 +0100
Gabriele Giacone 1o5g4...@gmail.com napsal(a):
On 03/03/2010 09:56 AM, Michal Čihař wrote:
Okay, the bug is that default-jdk should be in Build-Depends and not in
Build-Depends-Indep, because it is
Hello
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Simon Paillard
simon.paill...@resel.enst-bretagne.fr wrote:
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 09:09:12PM -0600, William Vera wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.0-1
of my package recoverjpeg.
It builds these binary packages:
recoverjpeg - tool
Hi
Dne Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:56:23 +0100
Giovanni Mascellani mascell...@poisson.phc.unipi.it napsal(a):
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 14:39:50 +0100, Michal Čihař ni...@debian.org wrote:
No, please read:
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-sourcebinarydeps
The problem
Hi.
On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:56:23 +0100, Giovanni Mascellani
mascell...@poisson.phc.unipi.it wrote:
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 14:39:50 +0100, Michal Čihař ni...@debian.org wrote:
No, please read:
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-sourcebinarydeps
The problem is that
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 14:39:50 +0100, Michal Čihař ni...@debian.org wrote:
No, please read:
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-sourcebinarydeps
The problem is that default-jdk is listed in Build-Depends-Indep, while
it should be in Build-Depends because it is also
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.78-1
of my package fpm2. (Programming language: C)
It builds the binary package: fpm2
The package is lintian clean.
The package fixes a wishlist bug (see below).
fpm2 (0.78-1)
Hello,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.5.2 of my package
ncmpcpp [0] (currently uploaded version is 0.4.1).
It builds this binary package:
ncmpcpp - ncurses-based client for the Music Player Daemon (MPD)
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs:
Damien Leone writes:
Hello,
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.5.2 of my package
ncmpcpp [0] (currently uploaded version is 0.4.1).
It builds this binary package:
ncmpcpp - ncurses-based client for the Music Player Daemon (MPD)
The package appears to be lintian
Hello,
First, thanks for your review.
On 03 Mar - 20:11, George Danchev wrote:
* you didn't Close: #XX these bugs from debian/changelog.
It has been done in a previous package version (0.5-0.1) but my
sponsor did not have the time to upload it. The provided package is
for 0.5.2, the
Damien Leone writes:
Hello,
First, thanks for your review.
On 03 Mar - 20:11, George Danchev wrote:
* you didn't Close: #XX these bugs from debian/changelog.
It has been done in a previous package version (0.5-0.1) but my
sponsor did not have the time to upload it. The provided
Hello,
On 03 Mar - 20:11, George Danchev wrote:
i.e. whatever is allocated by strdup(3) should be released by
free(3), and not
by delete[], even if it works by pure luck (since delete op might be
implemented by free with some implementations)
I included a patch to the package. It should be
Damien Leone writes:
Hello,
On 03 Mar - 20:11, George Danchev wrote:
i.e. whatever is allocated by strdup(3) should be released by
free(3), and not
by delete[], even if it works by pure luck (since delete op might be
implemented by free with some implementations)
I included a patch
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 04:44 +0200, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
Can you guys upstream a package into Debian with a gitweb URL reference?
If I'm understanding the question correctly, yes. We have Vcs-$VCS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/03/2010 02:39 PM, Michal Čihař wrote:
Okay, the bug is that default-jdk should be in Build-Depends and not in
Build-Depends-Indep, because it is required for clean.
It seems you're not satisfying build dependencies (d-bp with -d option?).
[Luis R. Rodriguez]
BTW -- while we're on the topic of 2.6.32 and the next Debian
release, and 802.11, do you guys ship iw by default yet?
It's available (version 0.9.14), but not shipped by default.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Peter Samuelson pe...@p12n.org wrote:
[Luis R. Rodriguez]
BTW -- while we're on the topic of 2.6.32 and the next Debian
release, and 802.11, do you guys ship iw by default yet?
It's available (version 0.9.14), but not shipped by default.
Can it?
Luis
--
On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 17:51 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Peter Samuelson pe...@p12n.org wrote:
[Luis R. Rodriguez]
BTW -- while we're on the topic of 2.6.32 and the next Debian
release, and 802.11, do you guys ship iw by default yet?
It's available
I revoke my request for sponsorship; the new hamlib version has been
uploaded.
-Kamal Mostafa
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 13:40 -0800, Kamal Mostafa wrote:
I have packaged a revision of hamlib, which I propose for review and
upload by a kindly sponsor. I am the Debian maintainer (u) for the
24 matches
Mail list logo
