Re: +dfsg extension meaning and reference docs ?

2010-03-25 Thread Olivier Berger
Hi. Le mercredi 24 mars 2010 à 11:43 -0700, Don Armstrong a écrit : Everything that is distributed in main (source and binary) needs to be DFSG free. If you have things in the upstream tarball which are nonfree, you need to strip them out and repack the tarball before uploading. See

Re: Question about package priority

2010-03-25 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:25:22AM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote: On Sun, 21.03.2010 at 20:28:32 +0100, Michael Tautschnig m...@debian.org wrote: On a sidenote, you should rather use ip addr show instead of ifconfig. Why, please? I gather that ip addr show has much richer output and is

RFS: ora2pg (updated package)

2010-03-25 Thread Julián Moreno Patiño
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 6.0-1 of my package ora2pg. It builds these binary packages: ora2pg - Oracle to PostgreSQL database schema converter The package appears to be lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL:

RFS: python-cloudfiles

2010-03-25 Thread Michael Shuler
Dear mentors and pythonistas, I am looking for a sponsor for python-cloudfiles Package name: python-cloudfiles Version : 1.7.0-1 Upstream Author : Rackspace Cloud Files cloudfi...@rackspacecloud.com URL : http://www.rackspacecloud.com/ License : MIT Section

Re: Source format 3.0 (quilt) and new debhelper dh syntax (maint-guide)

2010-03-25 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 04:31:58PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 03:31:41PM +0100, Tanguy Ortolo wrote: In fact, I am looking for a documentation that explains what dh $@ does for each call, and what the dh_auto_* do. The new maintainer guide gives some

Re: RFS: aaphoto

2010-03-25 Thread Joachim Reichel
Hi Andras, please avoid top-posts (replying above the quoted mail, quoting the entire mail). I changed the standard version in the control file and recreated the package in a SID chroot environment. The standard version is ok now. I noticed that you also converted the package to 3.0 quilt

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

2010-03-25 Thread George Danchev
Tony Houghton writes: Dear mentors, Hi, (excuse moi for the delay) It doesn't fix any Debian bugs, but it addresses an Ubuntu LP feature request and several upstream feature requests and bugs. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/roxterm/roxterm_1.18.1-1.dsc Uploaded. Thanks. --

Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package)

2010-03-25 Thread Tony Houghton
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:00:11 +0200 George Danchev danc...@spnet.net wrote: Tony Houghton writes: Dear mentors, Hi, (excuse moi for the delay) It doesn't fix any Debian bugs, but it addresses an Ubuntu LP feature request and several upstream feature requests and bugs.

RFS: mscgen 0.17-2 (Usual sponsor is [VAC])

2010-03-25 Thread Niels Thykier
Hi I have prepared mscgen 0.17-2.This upload is mainly just bug-fixes from upstream's SVN. Some of these bug-fixes requires an update of configure.ac and to avoid having to update the orig.tar.gz I decided to remove the affected autogenerated files during clean. Upstream seems to have become

Re: +dfsg extension meaning and reference docs ?

2010-03-25 Thread Don Armstrong
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Olivier Berger wrote: Any reason why there appears no mention of the +dfsg numbering suffix in the above [1] link ? See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=560287 Don Armstrong -- Them as can do has to do for them as can't. And someone has to speak up for