Re: RFS: checkinstall (new upstream)

2010-04-17 Thread Jan Hauke Rahm
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:48:55AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: On 15/04/10 17:16, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 04:28:13PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.6.2-1 of my package checkinstall. As per the comments of

Re: RFS: jackbeat (updated package)

2010-04-17 Thread Christoph Egger
Hi! On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 02:25:58PM +0200, M. van Brummelen wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.7.4-1.1 of my package jackbeat. It builds these binary packages: jackbeat - a drum machine-like audio sequencer with JACK support The package appears to be lintian

Re: RFS: pyamf

2010-04-17 Thread Christoph Egger
Hi! On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:35:10AM -0430, Miguel Landaeta wrote: I am looking for a sponsor for my package pyamf. * Package name: pyamf Version : 0.5.1-1 Upstream Author : The PyAMF Project d...@pyamf.org * URL : http://pyamf.org/ * License : MIT

Re: How to find a sponsor

2010-04-17 Thread nikrou77
Hi, In any case, thanks Paul to take time to answer me. I will try to be more attractive for sponsors. Nicolas 2010/4/17 Paul Wise lt;p...@debian.orggt; I personally skipped over your packages due to of lack of time and because they are related to PHP. Also, the debian-mentors FAQ has some

Re: RFS: libsysactivity (sponsor found)

2010-04-17 Thread Niels Thykier
Hi I found a sponsor for this package. Thanks for your time, ~Niels signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: purple-plugin-pack - Collection of Pidgin plugins (updated package, adoption)

2010-04-17 Thread Felix Geyer
Hello mentors, I'm still looking for a sponsor to upload this package. In the meantime I updated it to a new upstream version. The package is on Debian Mentors: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/purple-plugin-pack/purple-plugin-pack_2.6.3-1.dsc The current maintainer agreed that I

Re: RFS: pyamf

2010-04-17 Thread Miguel Landaeta
Hi Christoph, On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 5:15 AM, Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org wrote:        I've just having a look at it. Below you can find some random points I noticed.  * the BSD licene in common-licenses tells (c) The Regents of the    University of California -- it is unsuitable